UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No.)
Filed by the Registrant |
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant |
Check the appropriate box: |
National Bank Holdings |
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) |
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): |
|
|
|
|
7800 East Orchard Road, Suite 300
Greenwood Village, CO 80111
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
To the Shareholders of National Bank Holdings Corporation:
We cordially invite you to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of National Bank Holdings Corporation at 8:30 a.m. Mountain Time on Wednesday, May 2, 2018, at the DoubleTree by Hilton Denver Tech Center, located at 7801 East Orchard Road, Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111. The purpose of the meeting is to:
Notice of 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders |
| DEAR SHAREHOLDERS:I’m pleased to invite you to the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of National Bank Holdings Corporation. At the meeting, shareholders will vote on the following proposals: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information with respect to these matters is contained in the proxy statement accompanying this notice.
The proxy statement and the accompanying form of proxy are first being sent to shareholders on or about March 29, 2024.
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT: Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, we urge you to vote and submit your proxy so that as many shares as possible may be represented during the meeting. We appreciate your cooperation in returning your proxy promptly.
Please call us at 720-554-6640 if you need instructions on how to attend the meeting or have questions about how to vote.
A proxy for use at the meeting in the form accompanying this notice is hereby solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors from holders of Class A common stock. The Board of Directors has fixed March 12, 2018 as the record date for determining which shareholders have the right to receive notice of, and to vote at, the meeting or any postponements or adjournments thereof.
The proxy statement and the accompanying form of proxy are first being sent to shareholders on or about March 26, 2018.
Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, we urge you to vote and submit your proxy so that as many shares as possible may be represented at the meeting. Your vote is important and we appreciate your cooperation in returning your proxy promptly. Your proxy is revocable and will not affect your right to vote in person at the meeting.
Please call us at 720-529-3346 if you need directions to attend the meeting or have questions about how to vote in person.
By Order of the Board of Directors, | ||||
/s/ Angela Petrucci Angela Petrucci, Secretary |
| | Meeting Information | |
|
| Date: | Wednesday, May 1, 2024 | |
Greenwood Village, Colorado
March 19, 2018
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to Be Held on May 2, 2018: Our Proxy Statement and 2017 Annual Report to Shareholders are also available at www.proxyvote.com.
NATIONAL BANK HOLDINGS CORPORATION
PROXY STATEMENT
2018 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
| | Time: | 8:30 a.m. Mountain Time | |
|
| Location: | Community Banks Mortgage a division of NBH Bank 7800 E. Orchard Road, Suite 100 Greenwood Village, CO 80111 | |
| | | ||
| How to Vote and Other Details | |||
| | | | |
| |
Record | March 11, 2024 is the record date for determining which shareholders have the right to receive notice of, and to vote at, the meeting or any postponements or adjournments thereof. | |
| | Registered and beneficial shareholders can vote their shares in the following ways: | ||
| |
Internet | Log on to www.proxyvote.com and enter the 16- digit control number provided on your proxy card | |
| |
Telephone | Dial 1-800-690-6903 and enter the 16-digit control number provided on your proxy card | |
| |
| Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717 | |
| |
| If you are a “record” shareholder of Class A common stock (that is, you hold Class A common stock in your own name in NBHC’s stock records maintained by our transfer agent), register upon your arrival at the Meeting, request a ballot and submit the ballot with your voting instructions at the Meeting. | |
Table of Contents
General Information
This proxy statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors (the “Board of Directors” or the “Board”) of National Bank Holdings Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”, “NBHC”, “we”, “us” or “our”), to be used atduring our 20182024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Meeting”) and at any postponements or adjournments thereof. The Meeting will be held at the DoubleTree by Hilton Denver Tech Center,offices of Community Banks Mortgage, a division of NBH Bank located at 7801 East7800 E. Orchard Road, Suite 100, Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111 at 8:30 a.m. Mountain Time on Wednesday, May 2, 2018.1, 2024.
In this proxy statement, we refer to our employees as “associates.” In this proxy statement, we also refer to the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders, this proxy statement, our 20172023 Annual Report to Shareholders and the accompanying proxy as our “Proxy Materials.”
Holders of record of shares of Class A common stock at the close of business on March 12, 201811, 2024 (the record date) are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Meeting. As of such date, there were 30,394,33637,806,167 shares of Class A common stock outstanding and entitled to vote. In addition, as of such date, there were 226,363237,662 shares of unvested restricted stock (Class A common stock) entitled to vote. Each share of our Class A common stock is entitled to one vote on all matters (in the case of Proposal 1, with respect to the election of each director).
Please read the Proxy Materials carefully. You should consider the information contained in this proxy statement when deciding how to vote your shares. You have a choice of voting by proxy over the Internet, by using a toll-free telephone number or by completing a proxy card and mailing it in the postage-paid envelope provided. If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other holder of record, please refer to your proxy card or the voting information provided by your bank, broker or other holder of record to see which voting options are available to you. Voting onvia the Internet, by telephone or by mail will not prevent you from attending or voting your shares atduring the Meeting. However, if you hold shares through a bank, broker or other holder of record, you must obtain a proxy, executed in your favor, from the holder of record to be able to vote atduring the Meeting. Otherwise, your shares will be voted in the manner in which you instructed the record holder of your shares.
When you vote by proxy, your shares will be voted according to your instructions. If you are a shareholder of record, you may revoke your proxy at any time prior to the close of the polls atduring the Meeting by submitting a later dated proxy or delivering a written notice of revocation to our Secretary, Zsolt K. Besskó,Angela Petrucci, at National Bank Holdings Corporation, 7800 E. Orchard Road, Suite 300, Greenwood Village, CO 80111. If you hold shares through a bank, broker or other holder of record, you must contact the holder of record to revoke any prior voting instructions.
We pay the cost of soliciting proxies. Members of our Board and other associates may solicit proxies by mail, telephone, fax, email or in person.electronically. We will not pay directors or other associates any extra amounts for soliciting proxies. We may, upon request, reimburse brokerage firms, banks or similar nominees representing street name holders for their expenses in forwarding Proxy Materials to their customers who are street name holders and obtaining their voting instructions.
Any shareholder entitled to vote at the Meeting may attend the Meeting. If you hold shares through a bank, broker or other holder of record and would like to attend the Meeting, you will need to bring an account statement or other acceptable evidence of ownership of our Class A common stock as of the record date. Each shareholder who attends may be asked to present valid picture identification, such as a driver’s license or passport. Please note that the use of cell phones, tablets, recording and photographic equipment, computers and/or other similar devices is not permitted in the meeting room at the Meeting.
Our principal executive offices are located at 7800 E. Orchard Road, Suite 300, Greenwood Village, CO 80111.
Vote Required for Approval
The presence, by proxy or in person,at the meeting, of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our Class A common stock entitled to vote atduring the Meeting shall constitute a quorum. Withheld votes, abstentions and broker “non-votes” (shares held by a broker or nominee that has not received voting instructions from its client and does not have discretionary authority to vote on a particular matter) are counted as present for purposes of establishing a quorum. If you are a beneficial shareholder and your broker holds your shares in its name, the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) permit your broker to vote your shares on the ratification of the appointment of our independent registered certified public accounting firm (Proposal 2), even if the broker does not receive voting instructions from you. However, under the NYSE rules, your broker cannot vote your shares on the other proposals if you do not timely provide instructions for voting your shares.
For Proposal 1 (election of directors), the sevennine nominees for director receiving a plurality of the votes cast atduring the Meeting in person or by proxy will be elected. This means that the director nominee with the most votes for a particular slot is elected for that slot. Only votes “for” affect the outcome. BrokerWithheld votes and broker “non-votes” will have no effect on the voting results for this proposal.
Proposal 2 (ratification of the appointment of our independent registered certified public accounting firm) will be passed if a majority of the shares of our Class A common stock present atduring the Meeting and entitled to vote cast their votes “for” this proposal. Abstentions will be counted as votes present and entitled to vote and will have the same effect as votes “against” this proposal. No broker “non-votes” are expected to exist in connection with this proposal.
Proposal 3 (the advisory proposal on the compensation of our named executive officers) will be approved if a majority of the shares of our Class A common stock present atduring the Meeting and entitled to vote cast their votes “for” this proposal. Abstentions will be counted as votes present and entitled to vote and will have the same effect as votes “against” this proposal. Broker “non-votes” are not considered to be entitled to vote and therefore will have no effect on the voting results for this proposal. The advisory vote on executive compensation (Proposal 3) is non-binding, as provided by law.non-binding. Our Board and our Compensation Committee, however, will review the results of the vote and, consistent with our commitment to shareholder engagement, will take it into account in making a determination concerning the advisory vote on executive compensation.
Approval of any other business that may properly come before the Meeting will require the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy atduring the Meeting and entitled to vote thereon.
VOTING FOR REGISTERED AND BENEFICIAL SHAREHOLDERS
Voting for Registered and beneficial shareholders canBeneficial Shareholders
You may vote theiryour shares induring the following ways:Annual Meeting or by proxy. There are three ways to vote by proxy:
ByVia Internet: You may vote your shares over the internet by going to www.proxyvote.com. You will need to enter your 16-digit control number (found at the top right hand side of the form of proxy or voting instruction form that you received in the mail) to identify yourself as a shareholder on the voting website.
By Telephone: Vote by telephone by calling 1-800-690-6903. You will need to enter your 16-digit control number (found at the top right hand side of the form of proxy or voting instruction form that you received in the mail) to identify yourself as a shareholder.
By Mail: Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY, 11717.
In Person: If you are a “record” shareholder of Class A common stock (that is, you hold Class A common stock in your own name in NBHC’s stock records maintained by our transfer agent), register upon your arrival at the Meeting, request a ballot and submit the ballot with your voting instructions at the Meeting.
Beneficial shareholders who wish to vote at the Meeting will need to obtain a proxy form from the institution that holds your shares and follow the voting instructions on such form.
2
Your voting instructions must be received by the proxy voting deadline which is Tuesday, May 1, 2018.April 30, 2024. The internet (other than during the meeting) and telephone voting facilities will close at 11:59 p.m. Eastern timeTime on May 1, 2018. April 30, 2024.
Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we encourage you to vote your shares by proxy using one of the methods described above. Shareholders of record who attend the meeting may vote their shares online, even though they have sent in proxies.
If you have any questions or require voting assistance, please contact us at IR@nationalbankholdings.com.
Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
STOCK OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth, as of March 12, 2018,11, 2024, information regarding the beneficial ownership of our Class A common stock by (i) each of our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), Chief Financial Officer and the three other highest paid executive officers for 2017 (those five executive officers are listed in the table captioned “Summary Compensation Table” elsewhere in this proxy statement and are collectively referred to as the “Named Executive Officers” or “NEOs”); (ii) each director; (iii) all current directors and executive officers as a group and (iv) each person known by us to own beneficially more than five percent of the shares of our Class A common stock (our only class of voting securities outstanding).; (ii) each of our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) and the three other highest paid executive officers for 2023 (those five executive officers are listed in the table captioned “Summary Compensation Table” elsewhere in this proxy statement and are collectively referred to as the “Named Executive Officers” or “NEOs”); (iii) each director; and (iv) all current directors and executive officers as a group.
We have determined beneficial ownership in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Except as indicated by the footnotes below, we believe, based on the information furnished to us, that the persons and entities named in the tables below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock that they beneficially own, subject to applicable community property laws. We have based our calculation of the percentage of beneficial ownership on 30,620,69938,043,829 shares, which number is comprised of 30,394,33637,806,167 shares of Class A common stock outstanding and 226,363237,662 shares of unvested restricted stock (which shares of restricted stock are entitled to voting rights), in each case as of March 12, 2018.11, 2024.
In computing the number of shares of Class A common stock beneficially owned by a person and the percentage ownership of that person, we deemed outstanding shares of Class A common stock subject to options held by that person that are currently exercisable or exercisable within sixty days of March 12, 2018. 11, 2024.
We, however, did not deem these shares outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Beneficial ownership representing less than 1% is denoted with an asterisk (*).
| | | | |
| | Amount and nature of | | Percent of |
Name of beneficial owner |
| beneficial ownership |
| class |
5% Shareholders | | | | |
BlackRock, Inc.(1) | | 5,421,736 |
| 14.3% |
The Vanguard Group(2) | | 4,220,345 |
| 11.1% |
Wellington Management Group LLP(3) | | 3,847,909 | | 10.1% |
T. Rowe Price Investment Management, Inc.(4) | | 3,036,217 |
| 8.0% |
Named Executive Officers and Directors | | | | |
G. Timothy Laney(5) |
| 548,701 |
| 1.4% |
Aldis Birkans(6) | | 90,542 | | * |
Richard U. Newfield, Jr.(7) |
| 193,734 |
| * |
Angela N. Petrucci(8) | | 39,622 | | * |
Christopher S. Randall(9) | | 38,650 | | * |
Ralph W. Clermont(10) |
| 89,162 |
| * |
Robert E. Dean(11) |
| 32,020 |
| * |
Robin Doyle(12) | | 0 | | * |
Alka Gupta(13) | | 6,885 | | * |
Fred J. Joseph(14) |
| 21,329 |
| * |
Patrick G. Sobers(15) | | 36,582 | | * |
Micho F. Spring(16) |
| 38,256 |
| * |
Art Zeile(17) |
| 17,378 |
| * |
All current executive officers and directors as a group (15 persons) |
| 1,255,413 |
| 3.3% |
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Amount and nature of |
| Percent of |
Name of beneficial owner |
| beneficial ownership |
| class |
Named Executive Officers and Directors |
|
|
|
|
G. Timothy Laney(1) |
| 1,109,798 |
| 3.5% |
Brian F. Lilly(2) |
| 157,312 |
| * |
Zsolt K. Besskó(3) |
| 63,627 |
| * |
Richard U. Newfield, Jr.(4) |
| 366,928 |
| 1.2% |
Patrick G. Sobers(5) |
| 20,806 |
| * |
Ralph W. Clermont(6) |
| 81,936 |
| * |
Robert E. Dean(7) |
| 56,299 |
| * |
Fred J. Joseph(8) |
| 9,396 |
| * |
Micho F. Spring(9) |
| 66,026 |
| * |
Burney S. Warren, III(10) |
| 58,959 |
| * |
Art Zeile(11) |
| 4,230 |
| * |
All current executive officers and directors as a group (14 persons) |
| 2,031,252 |
| 6.4% |
5% Shareholders |
|
|
|
|
BlackRock, Inc.(12) |
| 3,436,780 |
| 11.2% |
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.(13) |
| 3,119,024 |
| 10.2% |
The Vanguard Group(14) |
| 2,336,881 |
| 7.6% |
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP (15) |
| 2,252,715 |
| 7.4% |
| (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
| As reported on Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January |
| (2) | As reported on Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 13, 2024 by The Vanguard Group (“Vanguard”). Vanguard reported sole voting power with respect to zero shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 4,164,151 shares, shared voting power with respect to 23,715 shares, and shared dispositive power with respect to 56,194 shares. |
| (3) | As reported on Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 8, 2024 jointly by Wellington Management Group LLP (“Wellington Management”), Wellington Group Holdings LLP (“Wellington Group”), Wellington Investment Advisors Holdings LLP (“Wellington Advisors”), and Wellington Management Company LLP (“Wellington Company”). Wellington Management, Wellington Group, and Wellington Advisors each reported sole voting power with respect to zero shares, sole dispositive power with respect to zero shares, shared voting power with respect to 2,915,315 shares, and shared dispositive power with respect to all shares beneficially owned. Wellington Company reported sole voting power with respect to zero shares, sole dispositive power with respect to zero shares, shared voting power with respect to 2,894,501 shares, and shared dispositive power with respect to all shares beneficially owned. Wellington Management reported that all shares beneficially owned are owned of record by clients of one or more investment advisers directly or indirectly owned by Wellington Management; accordingly, those clients |
| |
4 |
|
| have the right to receive, or the power to direct the receipt of, dividends from, or the proceeds from the sale of, such securities. |
| (4) | As reported on Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, |
| (5) |
|
|
|
|
| (6) | Includes 7,455 unvested restricted shares for which Mr. Birkans has voting power and 45,650 shares issuable upon the exercise of options. |
| (7) | Includes 5,929 unvested restricted shares for which Mr. Newfield has voting power and 50,254 shares issuable upon the exercise of options. |
| (8) | Includes 3,512 unvested restricted shares for which Ms. Petrucci has voting power and 13,301 shares issuable upon the exercise of options. |
| (9) | Includes 3,404 unvested restricted shares for which Mr. Randall has voting power and 20,738 shares issuable upon the exercise of options. |
| (10) | Includes 2,510 unvested restricted shares for which Mr. Clermont has voting power. Also includes 79,939 shares owned by the Ralph W. Clermont Irrevocable Trust. |
| (11) | Includes 2,151 unvested restricted shares for which Mr. Dean has voting power. |
| (12) | Ms. Doyle was appointed to the Board on March 18, 2024. |
| (13) | Includes 2,151 unvested restricted shares for which Ms. Gupta has voting power. |
| (14) | Includes 2,151 unvested restricted shares for which Mr. Joseph has voting power. |
| (15) | Includes 2,151 unvested restricted shares for which Mr. Sobers has voting power and 15,876 shares issuable upon the exercise of options. |
| (16) | Includes 2,151 unvested restricted shares for which Ms. Spring has voting power. |
| (17) | Includes 2,151 unvested restricted shares for which Mr. Zeile has voting power. |
| |
2024 Annual Proxy Statement | 5 |
PROPOSALProposal 1 - ELECTION OF DIRECTORSElection of Directors
Size and Composition of Board. We have setThe Board currently stands at nine members with the sizeappointment of the Board at seven members.Robin Doyle as of March 18, 2024. The current members of the Board are G. Timothy Laney (Chairman), Ralph W. Clermont (independent Lead Director), Robert E. Dean, Robin Doyle, Alka Gupta, Fred J. Joseph, Patrick Sobers, Micho F. Spring, Burney S. Warren, III and Art Zeile.
Nominees. Upon the recommendation of the Nominating and& Governance Committee, the Board has nominated the persons named below for reelection to the Board. With the exception of Mr. Laney, who serves as our Chairman, President and CEO, and Mr. Sobers, who retired as an executive officer of the bank in June 2021, the Board has determined that each of these nominees is an independent director, as discussed further below under “Director Independence.”
Each of the directors elected atduring the Meeting will be elected for a one-year term which expires at the next annual meeting of shareholders, and will serve until the director’s successor has been elected and qualified, or until the director’s earlier resignation or removal.
The Board recommends you vote FOR each of the nominees set forth below.
In the event that any nominee is no longer a candidate for director at the time of the Meeting, the proxyholders will vote for the rest of the nominees and may vote for a substitute nominee in their discretion. To the best of its knowledge, the Company has no reason to believe that any of the nominees will be unable to serve as directors if elected.
Ralph W. Clermont, Age 70
Mr. Clermont has served as a director for the Company since 2009 and as the Board’s independent Lead Director since May 2014. He also serves as Chair of the Board’s Audit & Risk Committee and as a member of NBH Bank’s board of directors. Mr. Clermont retired in 2008 as Managing Partner of the St. Louis office of KPMG LLP, and was formerly the partner in charge of KPMG’s Midwest financial services practice. Mr. Clermont joined the St. Louis office of KPMG in 1969 and was elected to partnership in 1977. Mr. Clermont spent over 39 years providing services to the banking industry and has had responsibility for the audits of numerous banking organizations. Subsequent to retiring,
|
The Board recommends you vote “FOR” each of the nominees set forth below. |
5
| |
6 | National Bank Holdings Corporation |
| | |
Age: 76 | Ralph W. Clermont Independent Lead Director Audit & Risk Committee Chair Nominating & Governance Committee Member Compensation Committee Member EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS Mr. Clermont has served as a director for the Company since 2009 and as the Board’s independent Lead Director since 2014. As the independent Lead Director, Mr. Clermont is an ex officio member of all of our Board committees with full voting rights. He also serves as Chair of the Board’s Audit & Risk Committee and as a board member of both NBH Bank and Bank of Jackson Hole Trust. He is also a member of the Trust Committee of Bank of Jackson Hole Trust. In October 2015, Mr. Clermont was appointed to the board of directors of Cass Information Systems, Inc., (NASDAQ: CASS), where he also serves on the audit committee and the governance committee. He also serves as a director on the board of Cass Commercial Bank. Mr. Clermont is a certified public accountant and a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and Missouri Society of Certified Public Accountants. Mr. Clermont retired in 2008 as Managing Partner of the St. Louis office of KPMG LLP, and was formerly the partner in charge of KPMG’s Midwest financial services practice. Mr. Clermont joined the St. Louis office of KPMG in 1969 and was elected to the partnership in 1977. Mr. Clermont was a member of the KPMG’s Assurance Services Committee and was chairman of KPMG’s Quality Improvement Audit Subcommittee. Mr. Clermont spent over 39 years providing services to the banking industry and has had responsibility for the audits of numerous banking organizations. Subsequent to retiring, Mr. Clermont has served as a consultant to various banking institutions on strategic planning, risk management and corporate governance matters. Mr. Clermont received a Bachelor of Science degree in accounting from Saint Louis University. Mr. Clermont’s qualifications to serve on our Board of Directors include his expertise in financial and accounting matters for complex financial organizations. |
Mr. Clermont has served as a consultant to various banking institutions on strategic planning, risk management and corporate governance matters. In October 2015, Mr. Clermont was appointed to the Board of Directors of Cass Information Systems, Inc., where he also serves on the Audit Committee and the Governance Committee. Mr. Clermont is a certified public accountant and a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and Missouri Society of Certified Public Accountants. Mr. Clermont was a member of the KPMG’s Assurance Services Committee and was chairman of KPMG’s Quality Improvement Audit Subcommittee. Mr. Clermont received a Bachelor of Science degree in accounting from Saint Louis University. Mr. Clermont’s qualifications to serve on our Board of Directors include his expertise in financial and accounting matters for complex financial organizations. As the independent Lead Director, Mr. Clermont is an ex officio member of all of our Board committees with full voting rights.
Robert E. Dean, Age 66
Mr. Dean has served as a director for the Company since 2009 and also serves as Chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee. Mr. Dean is a private investor. From 2000 to 2003, Mr. Dean was with Ernst & Young Corporate Finance LLC, a wholly owned broker-dealer subsidiary of Ernst & Young LLP, serving as a Senior Managing Director and member of the Board of Managers from 2001 to 2003. From 1976 to 2000, Mr. Dean practiced corporate, banking and securities law with Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP. Mr. Dean co-chaired the firm’s banking practice and advised bank clients on numerous capital markets and merger and acquisition transactions (including FDIC-assisted transactions). Mr. Dean was Partner-in-Charge of the Orange County, California office from 1993 to 1996 and was a member of the law firm’s Executive Committee from 1996 to 1999. Mr. Dean holds a Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of California at Irvine and a Juris Doctor degree from the University of Minnesota Law School. Since November 2014, Mr. Dean has served as a member of the boards of directors of two related Cornerstone closed-end mutual funds (Strategic Value (CLM) and Total Return (CRF)) and as a member of each audit and nominating and governance committee thereof. Mr. Dean’s substantial experience in bank capital markets and merger and acquisition transactions, bank regulatory matters and public company corporate governance matters qualifies him to serve on our Board of Directors.
Fred J. Joseph, Age 65
Mr. Joseph has served as a director of the Company since 2014 and also serves as a member of NBH Bank’s board of directors. Mr. Joseph was a financial services regulator for 30 years, retiring at the end of 2013 as the Banking and Securities Commissioner for the State of Colorado, a dual role created in 2011. He was originally appointed as the Securities Commissioner in 1999. In that role, he oversaw the regulatory agency that licenses stockbrokers, brokerage firms and investment advisers in Colorado. In his role as the Banking Commissioner, he had regulatory oversight of state-chartered commercial banks, money transmitters and trust companies in Colorado. Mr. Joseph also served as the Acting Banking Commissioner for the State of Colorado from 2008 to 2010. From 1992 to 1999, he was the Deputy Securities Commissioner for the State of Colorado. In that position, he oversaw the examination functions as well as the administrative matters for the Colorado Division of Securities. Prior to that, he was the Deputy Commissioner of Financial Services in Colorado for eight years, where he was responsible for the examination and regulatory oversight of state-chartered savings and loan associations and credit unions in Colorado. Mr. Joseph is a past President of the North American Securities Administrators Association (“NASAA”), and also served as a director on NASAA’s Board for almost a decade. Mr. Joseph currently serves as a board member of the Colorado Board of Mortgage Loan Originators, being appointed to that position by the Colorado Governor in 2014. He also serves as a member of the Investor Issues Committee for the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). Mr. Joseph holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration from Colorado State University-Pueblo and an MBA in Finance and Accounting from Regis University in Denver. Mr. Joseph’s substantial experience in the regulatory fields of financial services and securities qualifies him to serve on our Board of Directors.
6
| |
2024 Annual Proxy Statement | 7 |
| | |
Age: 72 | Robert E. Dean Independent Director Nominating & Governance Committee Chair Audit & Risk Committee Member Compensation Committee Member EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS Mr. Dean has served as a director for the Company since 2009 and also serves as Chairman of the Nominating & Governance Committee. Mr. Dean is a private investor. He serves as President and director of his condominium owners association. Since November 2014, Mr. Dean has also served as a member of the boards of directors of two related Cornerstone closed-end mutual funds (Strategic Value (CLM) and Total Return (CRF)) and as a member of each audit and nominating and governance committee thereof. From 2000 to 2003, Mr. Dean was with Ernst & Young Corporate Finance LLC, a wholly owned broker-dealer subsidiary of Ernst & Young LLP, serving as a Senior Managing Director and member of the board of managers from 2001 to 2003. From 1976 to 2000, Mr. Dean practiced corporate, banking and securities law with Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP. Mr. Dean co-chaired the firm’s banking practice and advised bank clients on numerous capital markets and merger and acquisition transactions (including FDIC-assisted transactions). Mr. Dean was Partner-in-Charge of the Orange County, California office from 1993 to 1996 and was a member of the law firm’s executive committee from 1996 to 1999. Mr. Dean holds a Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of California at Irvine and a Juris Doctor degree from the University of Minnesota Law School. Mr. Dean’s substantial experience in bank capital markets and merger and acquisition transactions, bank regulatory matters and public company corporate governance matters qualifies him to serve on our Board of Directors. |
G. Timothy Laney, Age 57
Mr. Laney has served as the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer and as a director for the Company since 2010 and currently holds the same positions at NBH Bank. Mr. Laney was appointed as Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors in 2014 and he also serves as the chairman of NBH Bank’s board of directors. Mr. Laney is the former Senior Executive Vice President and Head of Business Services at Regions Financial, one of the nation’s largest full-service banks. He joined Regions Financial in late 2007 to lead the transformation of the bank’s wholesale lines of business. Prior to his tenure at Regions Financial, Mr. Laney had a 24-year tenure with Bank of America, where he held senior management roles in small business, commercial banking, private banking, corporate marketing and change management. He also served as President of Bank of America, Florida, with more than 800 banking centers and $50 billion in total assets. He was also a member of Bank of America’s Management Operating Committee. Mr. Laney is active in community service and currently serves as a board member for the Colorado State Banking Board, the Colorado Bankers Association and Moffitt Cancer Center. Mr. Laney brings to our Board of Directors valuable and extensive experience from managing and overseeing a broad range of operations during his tenures at Bank of America and Regions Financial.
Micho F. Spring, Age 68
Ms. Spring has served as a director for the Company since 2009 and also serves as a member of NBH Bank’s board of directors. Ms. Spring is Chair, Global Corporate Practice of Weber Shandwick. Prior to joining Weber Shandwick, Ms. Spring was Chief Executive Officer of Boston Telecommunications Company. She served for four years as Deputy Mayor of Boston. She previously served as Chief of Staff to Boston Mayor Kevin H. White after four years of service in New York City government. Ms. Spring also served as a director of Citizens Bank of Massachusetts, one of the largest state-chartered banks in Massachusetts at the time of her service. Ms. Spring currently serves as Vice Chair of the Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce and on a member of the Corporation of Partners Healthcare, Inc. She also serves on numerous boards of civic organizations, including John F. Kennedy Library Foundation, Friends of Caritas Cubana and the Massachusetts Conference for Women. Ms. Spring attended Georgetown and Columbia Universities and received a Masters in Public Administration from Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government. Ms. Spring’s extensive public policy experience, expertise in public relations, involvement in community activities and knowledge of financial institutions make her a valuable member of our Board.
Burney S. Warren, III, Age 70
Mr. Warren has served as a director for the Company since 2009 and also serves as Chairman of the Compensation Committee. Mr. Warren has also served as an advisor to South State Corporation, a bank holding company based in South Carolina, since 2009. Prior to retirement in December 2007, Mr. Warren was Executive Vice President and Director of Mergers and Acquisitions for Branch Banking and Trust Company (“BB&T”), one of the largest commercial banks in the United States. Mr. Warren was responsible for the development, structure and negotiation of BB&T’s bank and non-bank acquisitions. During his tenure, he successfully completed the acquisition of over 50 banks and thrifts and numerous nonbank transactions, including capital markets, brokerage, fixed income and consumer finance. Prior to joining BB&T in 1990, Mr. Warren was President and Chief Executive Officer of First Federal Savings Bank, Greenville, N.C. Mr. Warren serves on the boards of the East Carolina University Foundation and East Carolina University Real Estate Foundation, and is the former chairman of the Real Estate Foundation. Mr. Warren received a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration from East Carolina University. Mr. Warren’s qualifications to serve on our Board of Directors include his extensive financial institutions experience, including identifying and integrating acquisitions for complex financial institutions.
7
| |
8 | National Bank Holdings Corporation |
Age: 61 | Robin A. Doyle Independent Director Audit & Risk Committee Member EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS Ms. Doyle has served as a director for the Company since March 18, 2024 and serves on the Board’s Audit & Risk Committee. Ms. Doyle owns and operates her own consulting firm focused on strengthening client’s data and risk management capabilities. Ms. Doyle is on the board of Dress for Success Central New Jersey and serves as a member of the executive committee and is chair of the finance committee.She is also a board member and Treasurer of her condominium owners association and serves on the advisory board of the Women’s Data Professional Group of the EDM Council. Ms. Doyle served as a founding board member of the Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation (GLEIF), where she was chair of the audit and finance committee and vice chair of the governance committee. Ms. Doyle was a founding board member for the Rutgers Business School Center for Women inBusiness, the Rutgers Business School dean’s advisory board, the board of NJ Junior Achievement and the board of Easter Seals of New Jersey where she also founded the organization’s first audit committee. During her 28 year career at J.P. Morgan (NYSE:JPM), Ms. Doyle served in several senior management roles at the company, including managing director in JPM’s Office of Regulatory Affairs, chief financial officer for the firm’s risk management organization, where she was also an executive member of J.P. Morgan’s board of directors risk policy committee, senior vice president of Chase Home Finance and senior vice president of JPM accounting policies group before retiring from JPM in 2021. Prior to joining JPM, Ms. Doyle held roles at Midlantic National Bank (now PNC Bank) in internal audit, KPMG’s audit department, and Prudential Insurance Co. Ms. Doyle has an MBA in Business and BS in Accounting from Rutgers University. Ms. Doyle’s distinguished career and expertise in financial services includes managing a number of finance functions, internal and external audit experiencing and managing a broad range of risk management functions, including risk governance, risk appetite, finance and technology. These experiences qualify her to serve on our Board of Directors. |
| |
2024 Annual Proxy Statement | 9 |
Age: 54 | Alka Gupta Independent Director Audit & Risk Committee Member Compensation Committee Member EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS Ms. Gupta has served as a director for the Company since 2021 and serves on the Board’s Audit & Risk Committee and Compensation Committee. Ms. Gupta is a Fortune 500 executive and tech entrepreneur with deep experience in digital transformation. Ms. Gupta currently serves as a director of Dwolla, and as the board chair of Digital Frontiers. From 2021 to 2023, Ms. Gupta was a director of MoneyGram International, Inc., where she also was a member of the Compliance and Ethics Committee. She previously served as a Venture Partner at Fin Venture Capital, a fintech B2B focused global venture fund. She was also Co-Founder and former President and board director at GlobaliD, Inc. During her tenure at GlobaliD, she led GlobaliD's growth, including building a high-quality team, launching a cutting-edge product and signing on first digital wallet customers. Prior to this, she was an executive at eBay/PayPal as Head of Strategy for eBay Marketplaces building new growth strategies in areas such as mobile commerce and cross-border payments. She earned her Master of Business Administration from the University of Pennsylvania Wharton School and her Bachelor of Science degree from Case Western Reserve University. |
| |
10 | National Bank Holdings Corporation |
| Joseph is a past President of the North American Securities Administrators Association (“NASAA”), and also served as a director on NASAA’s Board for almost a decade. Mr. Joseph currently serves as a board member of the Colorado Board of Mortgage Loan Originators, being appointed to that position by the Colorado Governor in 2014, and reappointed in 2018. He also serves as a member of the Investor Issues Committee for the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). In addition, Mr. Joseph serves as an advisory board member for Plains Dedicated, a privately-held trucking company.Mr. Joseph holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration from Colorado State University-Pueblo and an MBA in Finance and Accounting from Regis University in Denver. Mr. Joseph’s substantial experience in the regulatory fields of financial services and securities qualifies him to serve on our Board of Directors. | |
Age: 71 | Fred J. Joseph Independent Director Audit & Risk Committee Member Nominating & Governance Committee Member EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS Mr. Joseph has served as a director for the Company since 2014 and serves on the Board’s Audit & Risk Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee. He is a board member of both NBH Bank and Bank of Jackson Hole Trust. He is also a member of the Trust Committee of Bank of Jackson Hole Trust. Mr. Joseph is currently an advisory board member for Plains Dedicated, a privately-held trucking company. From 2014 to 2022, Mr. Joseph served as a board member of the Colorado Board of Mortgage Loan Originators and previously served as a board member of the Investor Issues committee for the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). Mr. Joseph was a financial services regulator for 30 years, retiring at the end of 2013 as the Banking and Securities Commissioner for the State of Colorado, a dual role created in 2011. From 2008 to 2010, Mr. Joseph served as the Acting Banking Commissioner for the State of Colorado. He was originally appointed as the Securities Commissioner in 1999. In that role, he oversaw the regulatory agency that licenses stockbrokers, brokerage firms and investment advisers in Colorado. In his role as the Banking Commissioner, he had regulatory oversight of state-chartered commercial banks, money transmitters and trust companies in Colorado. From 1992 to 1999, he was the Deputy Securities Commissioner for the State of Colorado. In that position, he oversaw the examination functions as well as the administrative matters for the Colorado Division of Securities. Prior to that, he was the Deputy Commissioner of Financial Services in Colorado for eight years, where he was responsible for the examination and regulatory oversight of state-chartered savings and loan associations and credit unions in Colorado. Mr. Joseph is a past President of the North American Securities Administrators Association (“NASAA”), and also served as a director on NASAA’s board for almost a decade. Mr. Joseph holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration from Colorado State University-Pueblo and an MBA in Finance and Accounting from Regis University in Denver. Mr. Joseph’s substantial experience in the regulatory fields of financial services and securities qualifies him to serve on our Board of Directors. |
Art Zeile, Age 54
| |
2024 Annual Proxy Statement | 11 |
| ad range of banking operations for more than 35 years. | |
Age: 63 | G. Timothy Laney Chairman of the Board EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS Mr. Laney has served as the Company’s President, Chief Executive Officer and director since 2010, and as the Chairman of the Board of Directors since 2014. Mr. Laney currently holds the same positions at NBH Bank, and as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Bank of Jackson Hole Trust, including serving as the Chairman on its Trust Committee. Additionally, Mr. Laney is a board member of Finstro Global Holdings Inc., Finexio, Moffitt Cancer Center, the Chairman of the USA Weightlifting Foundation and is the founder of the NBH Bank Do More Charity Challenge®. Mr. Laney previously served as a board member of the Colorado Bankers Association. Mr. Laney is the former Senior Executive Vice President and Head of Business Services at Regions Financial, one of the nation’s largest full-service banks. In 2007, he joined Regions Financial to lead the transformation of the bank’s wholesale lines of business. Prior to his tenure at Regions Financial, Mr. Laney had a 24-year tenure with Bank of America, where he held senior management roles in small business, commercial banking, private banking, corporate marketing and change management. He also served as President of Bank of America, Florida, with more than 800 banking centers and $50 billion in total assets. He was also a member of Bank of America’s Management Operating committee. Mr. Laney brings to our Board of Directors valuable and extensive experience from managing and overseeing a broad range of banking operations for more than 35 years. | |
| | |
| ||
Age: 66 | Patrick G. Sobers Director EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS Mr. Sobers has served as a director for the Company since 2021 and also serves as a member of the board of directors of both NBH Bank and Bank of Jackson Hole Trust. Mr. Sobers previously served as the EVP, Head of Business and Consumer Banking for NBH Bank. Mr. Sobers is currently a member of the board of trustees of Denver Seminary, a member of the Foundation board of the Moffitt Cancer Center, and he is the Treasurer for Third Way Center, as well as a member of its board. He has been very active in the communities where he has resided, serving on the boards of numerous civic and charitable organizations. Mr. Sobers has over 30 years of experience in the financial services industry. Prior to joining NBH Bank in 2012, he held several leadership positions at Bank of America, including: the Southeast Region’s Consumer Banking Executive; Customer Service and Solutions Executive; Premier Banking and Investments Regional Executive for Florida and Georgia (now Merrill Lynch Wealth Management); and as Tampa Market President. He holds a Bachelor of Applied Science degree in Business Administration from Boston University. | |
Mr. Zeile has served as a director for the Company since July 2016. Mr. Zeile is currently the CEO
| |
12 | National Bank Holdings Corporation |
Age: 74 | Micho F. Spring Independent Director Audit & Risk Committee Member Nominating & Governance Committee Member EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS Ms. Spring has served as a director for the Company since 2009 and serves on the Board’s Audit & Risk Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee. She also serves as a member of the board of directors of both NBH Bank and Bank of Jackson Hole Trust. Ms. Spring is currently a senior advisor at Weber Shandwick. Ms. Spring also currently serves as Chair Emeritus and is on the Executive Committee of the Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce and is a member of the Corporation of Partners Healthcare, Inc. She also serves on numerous boards of civic organizations, including National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD) New England, John F. Kennedy Library Foundation, Friends of Caritas Cubana and the Massachusetts Conference for Women. From 1992 to 2022, she was a senior executive at Weber Shandwick, where she served as Chief Reputation Officer, Chair of the Global Corporate Practice and President of New England. Prior to joining Weber Shandwick, Ms. Spring was Chief Executive Officer of Boston Telecommunications Company. Ms. Spring served for four years as Deputy Mayor of Boston. She previously served as Chief of Staff to Boston Mayor Kevin H. White after four years of service in New York City government. She also served as a director of Citizens Bank of Massachusetts, one of the largest state-chartered banks in Massachusetts at the time of her service. Ms. Spring attended Georgetown and Columbia Universities and received a Masters in Public Administration from Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government. Ms. Spring’s extensive public policy experience, expertise in public relations, involvement in community activities and knowledge of financial institutions make her a valuable member of our Board. | |
| | |
| | |
Age: 60 | Art Zeile Independent Director Compensation Committee Chair Audit & Risk Committee Member EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS Mr. Zeile has served as a director for the Company since 2016 and also serves as Chairman of the Compensation Committee and as a member of the Audit & Risk Committee. Mr. Zeile is currently the CEO of DHI Group, Inc. (NYSE: DHX), a leading provider of data, insights and employment connections through its specialized services for technology professionals and other select online communities. Mr. Zeile currently serves on the board of his own company, DHI Group, Inc., and also serves as an advisor of the Dispatch Health Advisory board. From 2008 to 2016, Mr. Zeile co-founded and served as the CEO of HOSTING, a pioneer in the cloud hosting space. From 2004 to 2006, he served as a director for Intrado (NASDAQ: TRDO) and served on the Audit Committee. During that time he was also a director of several other private companies. His extensive career experience also includes serving as CEO and co-founder of several technology companies. He began his career as an officer in the U.S. Air Force. Mr. Zeile holds a Master of Public Policy from the JFK School of Government, Harvard University and a Bachelor of Science in Astronautical Engineering from the U.S. Air Force Academy. Mr. Zeile's extensive experience in software, telecommunications, internet, datacenter and security technologies, with a particular focus on cybersecurity, qualifies him to serve on our Board of Directors. |
| |
2024 Annual Proxy Statement | 13 |
Governance
The Board is committed to sound and effective governance principles and practices. The Board has adopted Governance Guidelines to provide the framework for the governance of the Board and the Company. These Guidelinesguidelines set forth, among other matters, qualifications for Board membership, director independence standards, director responsibilities, information about the structure of the Board and its committees, director compensation, management succession and Board self-evaluation. Each director serves for a one-year term. We do not have a staggered or classified board.Board.
The Board has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all of our associates includingas well as our directors. Additionally, the Board has adopted a Supplemental Code of Ethics for CEO and Senior Financial Officers (together, with the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, the “Codes of Ethics”). We expect all of our associates to adhere to the highest standards of ethics and business conduct with other associates, clients, shareholders, and the communities we serve and to comply with all laws, rules, and regulations that govern our business.
Shareholders and other interested persons may view our Governance Guidelines, our Codes of Ethics and other key information about our corporate governance on our website at www.nationalbankholdings.com.
Board and Committee Meetings; Annual Meeting Attendance
Directors are expected to attend all Board meetings and meetings of committeescommittees. Only committee members vote on which they serve.committee actions taken.
The Board held eight7 meetings during 2017. During 2017,2023 and each director attended at least 75% of the total number of meetings of the Board and committees on which he or she served.committees. The Board and each standing committee regularly meet in executive session. During 2017,2023, the Board met in executive sessions without the CEO and other members of management fivepresent four times. During 2017,2023, the independent Lead Director chaired each of the executive sessions of the Board, and the chairs of each committee chaired the executive sessions of the committees.
All directors are expected to attend each annual meeting of shareholders of the Company. In 2017,2023, all directors attended the Company’s annual meeting of shareholders.
The Board has established three standing committees: Audit and& Risk Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and& Governance Committee. The Board’s committees act on behalf of the Board and report on their activities to the entire Board. The Board appoints the members and chair of each committee based on the recommendation of the Nominating and& Governance Committee. In 2023, the Audit & Risk Committee appointed a sub-committee to oversee Emerging Technologies and reports to the Audit & Risk Committee.
8
| |
14 | National Bank Holdings Corporation |
The following table provides membership information for each of the Board’s standing committees as of the date of this proxy statement.
Audit & Risk Committee | Compensation Committee | Nominating & Governance Committee | |||||
|
|
| |||||
Ralph W. Clermont, Chair* | | Art Zeile, Chair |
| | Robert E. Dean, Chair | | |
Robert E. Dean | | Ralph W. Clermont | | Ralph W. Clermont | | ||
Robin A. Doyle | | Robert E. Dean | | Fred J. Joseph | | ||
Alka Gupta* | | Alka Gupta | | Micho F. Spring | | ||
Fred J. Joseph | |
| |
| | ||
Micho F. Spring | |
|
| ||||
| | ||||||
Art | | | | | |
*Member of the Emerging Technologies Sub-Committee (Art Zeile, Chair)
With respect to each committee, the Board has adopted a charter that addresses its purpose, authority and responsibilities and contains other provisions relating to, among other matters, membership and meetings. In its discretion, each committee may form and delegate all or a portion of its authority to subcommittees of one or more of its members. As required by its charter, each committee periodically reviews and assesses its charter’s adequacy and reviews its performance, and also is responsible for overseeing risk related to the responsibilities described in its charter. Shareholders and other interested persons may view each committee’s charter on the Investor Relations section of our website at www.nationalbankholdings.com.
Audit and& Risk Committee
Purpose and Responsibilities. The Audit and& Risk Committee is responsible for, among other things:
| ● |
| reviewing our financial statements and public filings that contain financial statements, significant accounting policy changes, material weaknesses and significant deficiencies, if any, and risk management issues; |
| ● |
| overseeing the performance of our internal audit function as well as serving as an independent and objective body to monitor and assess our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, our financial reporting processes and related internal control |
| ● | reviewing the |
| ● |
| overseeing the audit and other services of our outside auditors and being directly responsible for the appointment, independence, qualifications, compensation and oversight of the outside |
| ● |
| discussing any disagreements between our management and the outside auditors regarding our financial |
| ● |
|
| ● | preparing the Audit |
Membership and Meetings. Under its charter, the Audit and& Risk Committee must have a minimum of three members. No Audit and& Risk Committee member may serve on the audit committee of more than two other public companies. Each member of the Audit and& Risk Committee is independent, as independence for audit committee members is defined by NYSE and SEC rules, as discussed below under “Director Independence.” The Board has determined, in its business judgment, that each current member of the Audit and& Risk Committee is financially literate as required by NYSE rules, and that Mr. Clermont, the committee’s chair, qualifiesand Ms. Doyle, each qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by SEC regulations.
The Audit and& Risk Committee meets as often as necessary to carry out its responsibilities, but no less than quarterly. In 2017,2023, the Audit and& Risk Committee met four times.
| |
2024 Annual Proxy Statement | 15 |
Compensation Committee
Purpose and Responsibilities. The Compensation Committee is responsible for, among other things:
| ● |
| determining the compensation of our executive officers; |
| ● |
| reviewing our executive compensation policies and plans; |
| ● |
| oversight of the Company’s compensation practices generally; |
| ● |
| administering and implementing our equity compensation plans; |
| ● |
| preparing a report on executive compensation for inclusion in our proxy statement for our annual meeting; and |
| ● |
| overseeing the Company’s talent management and succession planning process, including succession planning for the position of CEO. |
9
The Compensation Committee’s process and procedures for establishing compensation for our Named Executive Officers is discussed in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section elsewhere in this proxy statement.
Membership and Meetings. Under its charter, the Compensation Committee must have a minimum of three members, two of which must meet the definition of a “non-employee director” under Rule 16b-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and qualify as an “outside director” under Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m). All Compensation Committee members must be independent under NYSE rules. The Board has determined that each current Compensation Committee member meets these qualifications, as further discussed below under “Director Independence.” The Compensation Committee meets as often as necessary to carry out its responsibilities.responsibilities, but no less than quarterly. In 2017,2023, the Compensation Committee met four times.
Nominating and& Governance Committee
Purpose and Responsibilities. The Nominating and& Governance Committee is responsible for, among other things:
| ● |
| identifying individuals qualified to become members of our Board of Directors and recommending director candidates for election or reelection to our Board; |
| ● |
| reviewing and making recommendations to our Board of Directors with respect to the compensation and benefits of directors; |
| ● |
| reviewing and approving or ratifying all related-party transactions in accordance with the Company’s Related Person Transactions Policy; |
| ● |
| assessing the performance of our Board of Directors and its committees; and |
| ● |
| monitoring our governance policies, principles and |
Information about the Nominating and& Governance Committee’s process and procedures for establishing director compensation appears below under the “Director Compensation” section.
Membership and Meetings. Under its charter, the Nominating and& Governance Committee must have a minimum of three members, each of whom must be independent under NYSE rules. The Board has determined that each member meets this standard, as discussed below under “Director Independence.” The Nominating and& Governance Committee meets as often as necessary to carry out its responsibilities.responsibilities, but no less than quarterly. In 2017,2023, the Nominating and& Governance Committee met four times.
Our Governance Guidelines and committee charters require that a majority of the members of the Board of Directors and all members of the Audit and Risk Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee meet the criteria for independence required by the NYSE. Our Governance Guidelines require all members of the Audit and Risk Committee to meet the heightened independence requirements for audit committee members under the Exchange Act.
In February 2018, the Board, with the assistance of the Nominating and Governance Committee, undertook its annual review of director independence. In connection with this review, the Board evaluated banking, commercial, business, investment, legal, charitable, consulting, familial or other relationships with each director, and us and our affiliates. As a result of this review, the Board affirmatively determined that all of the directors are independent of the Company and its management under the corporate governance standards of the NYSE, including applicable SEC rules, with the exception of G. Timothy Laney because of his employment as an executive of the Company.
The Board is responsible for overseeing the exercise of corporate power and seeing that our business and affairs are managed to meet our stated goals and objectives and that the long-term interests of our shareholders are served. The Company currently does not have a fixed policy with respect to whether the same person may serve as both the Chairman of the Board and the Chief Executive Officer. The Board believes that it is in the best interests of the Company for the Board, in consultation with the Nominating and Governance Committee, to make this determination from time to time. Pursuant to the Company’s Governance Guidelines, when the position of Chairman of the Board is
10
not held by an independent director, the independent directors shall appoint an independent director to serve as the independent Lead Director.
In 2014, the Board elected G. Timothy Laney, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, to serve as Chairman of the Board and the independent directors appointed Ralph W. Clermont to serve as the independent Lead Director. The Board has concluded, based upon the Company’s size and history and its years of experience with Mr. Laney as Chief Executive Officer and as a fellow director, that a combined Chairman/CEO role for Mr. Laney and an independent Lead Director with a strong role and defined authorities is the better corporate governance structure for the Company at this point in its history. The Board considered Mr. Laney’s strong leadership roles with the Company’s shareholders and other stakeholders and with ongoing strategic planning, among other factors, and Mr. Clermont’s demonstrated ability to work with the Company’s senior management and provide leadership on Board and committee issues. The Board has been very pleased with its four years of experience under this board leadership structure, which has enhanced Board communication and strategic planning.
The Board believes that the duties of the independent Lead Director under the Company’s Governance Guidelines and the Board’s practice of regular meetings of, and communications between, independent directors in executive session without management both are important parts of the Company’s corporate governance safeguards. Pursuant to the Company’s Governance Guidelines, the duties of the independent Lead Director include: (i) serving as a liaison, and facilitating communication, between the Chairman of the Board and the independent directors; (ii) organizing, convening and presiding over executive sessions of the independent directors; (iii) presiding at all meetings of the Board at which the Chairman of the Board is not present; (iv) approving meeting schedules and agendas proposed by the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and consulting with the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer regarding the information to be provided to the directors in conjunction with such meetings; (v) serving as an advisor to the Board committees, chairs of the Board committees and other directors; (vi) serving as a member ex officio of each of the Board’s standing committees, with full voting rights on each such committee; (vii) if requested by major shareholders, ensure that he or she is available for consultation and direct communication; (viii) call meetings of the Board if deemed advisable by the independent Lead Director; and (ix) such other duties and responsibilities as assigned from time-to-time by the independent directors. As part of his duties as Lead Director, Mr. Clermont speaks regularly with Mr. Laney throughout the year.
Our current board leadership structure supports the independence of the independent directors. The independent directors meet in executive session at each Board meeting and each of the standing committees is comprised solely of and led by independent directors. Our independent Lead Director presides at each executive session of the independent directors of the Board and the independent committee chairs preside over the executive sessions of their respective committees. Moreover, both the Chairman and the independent Lead Director serve as members of the board of directors of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, NBH Bank (the “Bank Board”), which further contributes to the oversight of our business, management and policies.
The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight
Our Board of Directors oversees risk management throughout the Company. The Board accomplishes this primarily through its three standing committees, each of which is active in risk management.
The Audit and Risk Committee is responsible for oversight of the Company’s market, credit, liquidity, fraud, legal, compliance and other financial, operational (including cybersecurity) and reputational risks. The Audit and Risk Committee is further responsible for reviewing and approving guidelines, policies and processes for managing these risks. The Audit and Risk Committee monitors the Company’s risk exposure in all risk categories through regular reports prepared by members of management, including the Company’s Chief Risk Management Officer. The Audit and Risk Committee determines the risk appetite of the Company. Additionally, the Audit and Risk Committee meets with representatives from the Company’s internal audit function and the Company’s independent registered public accountant, including in executive sessions without management present.
The Compensation Committee oversees risks related to compensation, including risks that may arise from the Company’s incentive compensation practices. The Compensation Committee oversees and evaluates the design, administration and risk management of all of the Company’s material incentive compensation arrangements to ensure consistency with the safety and soundness of the Company and to appropriately balance risk and reward. The
11
Compensation Committee also oversees the annual compensation risk assessment to identify any compensation practices that may present an unacceptable level of risk to the Company.
The Nominating and Governance Committee oversees the Company’s governance program. This includes the Company’s Code of Ethics, Insider Trading Policy, disclosure policies, management of potential conflicts of interest, including related party transactions, and director independence.
Shareholders and other interested parties who wish to communicate with the Board, the independent directors as a group, or one or more individual directors may do so by contacting the Board’s Secretary by mail at National Bank Holdings Corporation, 7800 E. Orchard Road, Suite 300, Greenwood Village, CO 80111. Under our Governance Guidelines, the Secretary is responsible for referring such communication to the Board.
Director Nomination Process, Director Qualifications and Board Diversity
Director Selection Process and Qualifications.The Nominating and& Governance Committee is responsible for identifying and reviewing the qualifications and skills of Board candidates and for recommending candidates for membership on our Board of Directors. The NominatingBoard has continually sought directors with backgrounds and Governance Committee is responsible for identifyingskills important to the priorities of the Company, which continue to change in connection with our strategic
| |
16 | National Bank Holdings Corporation |
objectives, including our digital strategy. Significant banking regulatory skills were added when Mr. Joseph joined our Board in 2014. In 2016, high-level technology and reviewingcybersecurity skills were added with the qualificationsappointment of Mr. Zeile as a director. The 2021 additions of Ms. Gupta and independence of Board candidates. While the Nominating and Governance Committee doesMr. Sobers not have a formal policy regardingonly added diversity pursuant to our Governance Guidelines,Board, but Ms. Gupta brings a breadth of digital payments skills and Mr. Sobers brings his significant years of consumer banking experience, both of which reflect the continual evolution of our Board. The 2024 addition of Ms. Doyle brings significant experience in accounting, risk management and regulatory affairs, and Ms. Doyle qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by SEC regulations. The breadth of experience and skills of the proposed Board is exemplified by the Board Skills Matrix chart below:
Director Diversity and Director Appointments. The Nominating and& Governance Committee considers diversity in its assessment of potential nominees for Board membership. The amount of consideration givenmembership, pursuant to diversity variesour Governance Guidelines. Since mid-2021, we have added three new diverse Board members with important experience and skillsets, as discussed above. These have included Patrick Sobers (August 2021), Alka Gupta (November 2021) and Robin Doyle (March 2024). Combined with the Nominatingretirement of Burney Warren, a director since 2009, these additions have significantly increased our board diversity and Governance Committee’s determination of whether we would benefit from expandingreduced the Board’s diversity in a particular area. We believe that the compositionaverage age and tenure of our Board has consistently demonstrated diversity as defined by viewpoint, background and professional experience, which is further exemplified by the chart below:directors.
Director Qualifications
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
Recent NBHC Director Appointments. In early 2016, the Nominating and Governance Committee began reviewing potential candidates for the Board given Frank Cahouet’s expected retirement from the Board in May 2016. The full Board (including Mr. Cahouet) gave input to the Committee regarding desired skills and other attributes of future additions to the Board and provided potential candidate names throughout the process. Since the Board added significant banking and securities regulatory expertise in 2014 with the addition of Fred Joseph to the Board, in 2016 it decided to
12
seek candidates with significant information technology expertise, particularly in the area of cybersecurity, given the importance of that area to the business of the Company. The Board also prioritized its search for 1) female candidates, 2) candidates in the Company’s primary geographic areas of the Kansas City Metro Area and Colorado and 3) candidates with prior public company board experience. An extensive review of candidates who would add to the diversity of the existing Board both, in terms of skills and gender, was undertaken. Given the primary goal of adding information technology and cybersecurity skills to the Board and in light of the ages of the other independent board members (then 63-68 years of age), there was also a focus on relatively younger candidates during the search process.
In June 2016, after an extensive search for and evaluation of the candidates, the Nominating and Governance Committee recommended that Art Zeile be appointed to the Board based on his experience and background, including his extensive information technology and cybersecurity expertise. Mr. Zeile was approved by the full Board and joined as an independent director on July 1, 2016.
The Nominating and Governance Committee is not currently looking to expand the size of its Board, but the committee expects to place a high priority on seeking a female candidate in the event that a new director appointment is considered.
Diversity and Inclusion at NBH Bank. From our independent directors to our front line associates, we believe diversity and inclusion are important elements in building and sustaining a successful organization and a positive, results-driven culture. In addition to our focus on diversity and inclusion with respect to our Company Board, we have extended that focus to our Bank Board, which is diverse in experience and both racial and gender diversity. For additional information regarding our Bank Board, please visit www.nationalbankholdings.com. It is also an important goal of the Company to have diverse management that is reflective of our community, clients and associate base. Finally, our commitment to diversity and inclusion is further evidenced by the Company-wide program we developed to tangibly foster equality and leadership development opportunities for our entire associate base. This extends to our involvement in civic and community organizations and activities that help us actively demonstrate advocacy for equality in the markets we serve.
Shareholder Nominations. Shareholders are welcome to recommend candidates for membership on the Board. The Nominating and& Governance Committee, in accordance with its charter, will evaluate candidates in the same manner that it evaluates other potential nominees. Our Bylaws require timely notice of shareholder nominations to our Secretary, as further discussed in the section “2019“2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders - Shareholder Proposals” elsewhere in this proxy statement. In order to make a nomination, a shareholder must be a shareholder at the time the Company gives notice of its annual meeting and at the time of the annual meeting, must be entitled to vote at the annual meeting, and must comply with the procedures of our Bylaws. The Bylaws require certain information regarding shareholders who wish to nominate candidates for Board membership. This includes (i) the name and address of such shareholder, as they appear on the Company’s books, of such beneficial owner, if any, and of their respective affiliates or associates or others acting in concert therewith, (collectively, the “Nominating Party”), (ii) information regarding the shares owned by the Nominating Party, (iii) information regarding derivative and other instruments regarding the Company’s stock that the Nominating Party owns, (iv) contracts, arrangements, understandings or relationships the Nominating Party has entered into concerning the Company’s stock and (v) other information relating to the Nominating Party that would be required to be disclosed in a proxy statement or other filings required to be made in connection with solicitations of proxies for the election of directors in a contested election pursuant to Section 14 of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. For complete description of the requirements and procedures for shareholder nominations, please refer to our Bylaws.
| |
2024 Annual Proxy Statement | 17 |
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
During 2017,2023, Messrs. Warren,Zeile, Clermont, Dean and Warren and Ms. SpringGupta served as members of our Compensation Committee. Mr. Warren did not stand for re-election and retired on May 9, 2023. None of them has at any time been an officer or associate of the Company, and none has had any relationship with the Company of the type that is required to be disclosed under Item 404 of Regulation S-K. None of our executive officers serves or has served as a member of the boardBoard of directors, compensation committeeDirectors, Compensation Committee or other board committee performing equivalent functions of another entity that has one or more executive officers serving as a member of our Board of Directors or Compensation Committee.
Director Independence
Our Governance Guidelines and committee charters require that a majority of the members of the Board of Directors and all members of the Audit & Risk Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating & Governance Committee meet the criteria for independence required by the NYSE. Our Governance Guidelines require all members of the Audit & Risk Committee to meet the heightened independence requirements for audit committee members under the Exchange Act.
13In February 2024, the Board, with the assistance of the Nominating & Governance Committee, undertook its annual review of director independence. In connection with this review, the Board evaluated banking, commercial, business, investment, legal, charitable, consulting, familial or other relationships with each director, and us and our affiliates. As a result of this review, the Board affirmatively determined that all of the directors are independent of the Company and its management under the corporate governance standards of the NYSE, including applicable SEC rules, with the exception of Mr. Laney because of his employment as an executive of the Company and Mr. Sobers due to his service until June 30, 2021 as an executive officer of NBH Bank. As part of the due diligence process in evaluating Ms. Doyle as a director candidate, the Board determined that Ms. Doyle has also met the director independence criteria as described above.
Board Leadership Structure
The Board is responsible for overseeing the exercise of corporate power and seeing that our business and affairs are managed to meet our stated goals and objectives and that the long-term interests of our shareholders are served. The Company currently does not have a fixed policy with respect to whether the same person may serve as both the Chairman of the Board and the Chief Executive Officer. The Board believes that it is in the best interests of the Company for the Board, in consultation with the Nominating & Governance Committee, to make this determination from time to time. Pursuant to the Company’s Governance Guidelines, when the position of Chairman of the Board is not held by an independent director, the independent directors shall appoint an independent director to serve as the independent Lead Director.
In 2014, the Board elected Mr. Laney, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, to serve as Chairman of the Board and the independent directors appointed Mr. Clermont to serve as the independent Lead Director. The Board concluded, based upon the Company’s size and history and its years of experience with Mr. Laney as Chief Executive Officer and as a fellow director, that a combined Chairman/CEO role for Mr. Laney and an independent Lead Director with a strong role and defined authorities is the better corporate governance structure for the Company. The Board considered Mr. Laney’s strong leadership roles with the Company’s shareholders and other stakeholders and with ongoing strategic planning, among other factors, and Mr. Clermont’s demonstrated ability to work with the Company’s senior management and provide leadership on Board and committee issues. The Board has been very pleased with its ten years of experience under this board leadership structure, which has enhanced Board communication and strategic planning.
The Board believes that both the duties of the independent Lead Director under the Company’s Governance Guidelines and the Board’s practice of regular meetings of, and communications between, directors in executive session without management are important parts of the Company’s corporate governance safeguards. Pursuant to the Company’s Governance Guidelines, the duties of the Lead Director include: (i) serving as a liaison, and facilitating communication, between the Chairman of the Board and the other directors; (ii) organizing, convening and presiding over executive sessions of the independent directors;
| |
18 | National Bank Holdings Corporation |
(iii) presiding at all meetings of the Board at which the Chairman of the Board is not present; (iv) approving meeting schedules and agendas proposed by the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and consulting with the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer regarding the information to be provided to the directors in conjunction with such meetings; (v) serving as an advisor to the Board committees, chairs of the Board committees and other directors; (vi) serving as a member ex officio of each of the Board’s standing committees, with full voting rights on each such committee; (vii) if requested by major shareholders, ensuring that he or she is available for consultation and direct communication; (viii) calling meetings of the Board if deemed advisable by the independent Lead Director; and (ix) such other duties and responsibilities as assigned from time-to-time by the independent directors. As part of his duties as independent Lead Director, Mr. Clermont speaks regularly with Mr. Laney and other executives throughout the year.
Our current Board leadership structure supports the independence of directors. The directors meet in executive session without the Chairman & CEO or anyone from management a minimum of four times a year and each of the standing committees is comprised solely of and led by independent directors. Our independent Lead Director presides at each executive session of the independent directors of the Board and the independent committee chairs preside over the executive sessions of their respective committees. Moreover, both the Chairman and the independent Lead Director, as well as Ms. Spring and Messrs. Joseph and Sobers, serve as members of the Board of Directors of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries, NBH Bank (the “Bank Board”), and Bank of Jackson Hole Trust (the “BOJHT Board”) which further contributes to the oversight of our business, management and policies.
The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight
Our Board of Directors oversees risk management throughout the Company. The Board accomplishes this primarily through its three standing committees, each of which is active in risk management.
The Audit & Risk Committee is responsible for oversight of the Company’s market, credit, liquidity, fraud, legal, compliance and other financial, operational (including cybersecurity) and reputational risks. The Audit & Risk Committee is further responsible for reviewing and approving guidelines, policies and processes for managing these risks. The Audit & Risk Committee monitors the Company’s risk exposure in all risk categories through regular reports prepared by members of management, including the Company’s Chief Risk Management Officer (“CRMO”). The Audit & Risk Committee determines the risk appetite of the Company. Additionally, the Audit & Risk Committee meets with representatives from the Company’s internal audit function and the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, including in executive sessions without management present.
The Company devotes considerable resources to protect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of its subsidiary Banks’ systems and data, including associate and client information. Through coordinated efforts across our information technology, risk management, and third parties, we continuously enhance our suite of cyber-defense and information security capabilities. Further, the Audit & Risk Committee is updated quarterly on Information Security and Cybersecurity trends and current efforts, and receives an annual report on the Company’s Information Security Risk Assessment efforts. Mr. Zeile, one of our directors who has extensive experience in information technology and cybersecurity matters, regularly discusses the Company’s technology initiatives with senior management responsible for these areas. In addition, Ms. Gupta has added deep experience in digital transformation and digital payment systems to our Audit & Risk Committee as a member. Both Mr. Zeile (chair) and Ms. Gupta, along with Mr. Clermont are members of the Emerging Technologies Sub-Committee that reports to our Audit & Risk Committee, that assists with oversight of emerging technologies with respect to current and future risks associated with new technologies being considered by the Company and how such technologies fit into the Company’s overall strategy.
The Compensation Committee oversees risks related to compensation and human capital management, including risks that may arise from the Company’s incentive compensation practices. The Compensation Committee oversees and evaluates the design, administration and risk management of all of the Company’s material incentive compensation arrangements to ensure consistency with the safety and soundness of the Company and to appropriately balance risk and reward. The Compensation Committee also oversees the annual compensation risk assessment to identify any compensation practices that may present an unacceptable level of risk to the Company. In addition, the Compensation Committee oversees risks
| |
2024 Annual Proxy Statement | 19 |
associated with human capital management in its oversight of the Company’s talent management and succession planning process.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
The Nominating & Governance Committee oversees the Company’s governance program. This includes the Company’s Code of Ethics, Insider Trading Policy, disclosure policies, management of potential conflicts of interest, including related party transactions, and director independence.
Communications with Directors
Shareholders and other interested parties who wish to communicate with the Board, the independent directors as a group, or one or more individual directors may do so by contacting the Board’s Secretary by mail at National Bank Holdings Corporation, 7800 E. Orchard Road, Suite 300, Greenwood Village, CO 80111. Under our Governance Guidelines, the Secretary is responsible for referring such communication to the Board.
Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Matters – “Doing Good Committee”
Beginning with our Board and through our associate base, we are committed to “Doing Good.” It is our strong belief in “Doing Good” that leads to our many efforts regarding ESG and sustainability with respect to our people, our clients, and with a focus on strengthening the communities and markets in which we operate our business. The following summary sets forth the activities undertaken by the Company that reflect its guidance with regards to its environmental, social and governance commitment to “Doing Good”, under the leadership of our Doing Good Committee. Our Doing Good Committee is comprised of a multi-disciplinary group of associates throughout NBH Bank with oversight by the executive management team. Additionally, Patrick Sobers, one of our directors, acts as the co-chair of the Doing Good Committee and as the liaison to our Board of Directors, providing guidance and updating the Board on our activities.
Environmental
We are committed to safeguarding the environment through minimizing our impact by using environmentally friendly office products and materials and optimizing our use of office and banking center space. In addition, we continue to focus and invest in our mobile and digital platforms, resulting in a reduction in paper and fuel emissions. We have provided financing for green and sustainable businesses and are actively exploring more opportunities to invest in these industries.
Social
Our corporate culture is driven by our commitment to “Doing Good,” supported by our core values of Integrity, Meritocracy, Teamwork, Citizenship and community. The Company was founded in 2009 during the great recession, and the strong fundamentals and conservative principles that we put in place at our inception have consistently shaped how we operate our business.
Responsible and Client-Focused Business Practices
Our commitment to deliver common sense banking through building relationships with our clients that are based on the principles of fairness and simplicity continues to guide our business practices. We recognize that if our clients succeed, we succeed.
Our banking subsidiaries are community banks that understand that small businesses are critical for job creation, innovation and keeping money in the local communities we serve. Our subsidiary NBH Bank is an approved lender in the Small Business Administration’s (SBA) Preferred Lender Program. We offer a range of SBA loans and products to support our small business clients seeking to grow and expand their businesses. Through our acquisition of Rock Canyon Bank in September 2022, we obtained a highly successful SBA business platform. Additionally, our acquisition of the Bank of Jackson Hole has enabled us to offer trust and wealth management services to our clients and communities through the Bank of Jackson Hole Trust.
| |
20 | National Bank Holdings Corporation |
Knowledge is power and we provide resources on our bank websites to keep our clients informed on a number of important topics, including cyber security, fraud, financial planning, business trends, and more.
Supporting our Communities
The Company has a long-standing commitment to corporate social responsibility. We recognize our role in building and contributing to the health and safety of our surrounding community and workforce. We believe that our Company’s long-term success is deeply tied to the welfare of the communities we serve. We support a number of causes that underscore our focus on corporate social responsibility with our priorities being on helping people: (1) find meaningful work (2) find affordable housing, and (3) become financially empowered.
We strive to make a positive impact in the communities we serve through consistent engagement, as well as maintaining strong partnerships with a wide range of charitable organizations and causes. All of our associates are granted eight paid hours each year to donate their time to non-profit organizations that align with our Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) initiatives. In addition to volunteering their time, our associates hold board and committee positions, both internally and externally, aimed to better the communities we serve.
In 2023, we completed our eighth Do More Charity Challenge® and also organized and hosted the first Do More Concert® with proceeds benefiting Alphapointe. We continue to contribute directly to a wide range of nonprofits in our communities. Our NBH Charitable Foundation provided much needed funding to nonprofits including the Third Way Center, Young Americans Center for Financial Education and Habitat for Humanity in Metro Denver, Junior Achievement in Kansas City, Utah, Texas, and Idaho, People Fund in Texas, and Hope House and People of All Colors Succeed in Kansas City.
Human Capital
Our core values also represent our belief that our Company’s long-term success is deeply tied to having a dedicated and engaged workforce. We are committed to building and contributing to a healthy workplace environment for our associates by investing in competitive compensation and benefit packages, promoting inclusion of diverse viewpoints and backgrounds, providing training and career development opportunities and promoting qualified associates within our organization. We also encourage our associates to connect with one another through our various associate peer network groups.
Equity, Diversity and Inclusion
We are committed to attracting, developing, and retaining associates who reflect the communities in which we serve. Additionally, equity, diversity and inclusion helps us to connect and build better relationships within our Company and communities. This is reflected in the following data:
| ● | The Company’s workforce is made up of 1,274 full-time and part-time associates and the average tenure is six years as of December 31, 2023. |
| ● | 63% of the Company’s workforce is female and 54% of the Company’s managerial roles are female, as of December 31, 2023. |
| ● | Minorities represent 25% of the Company’s workforce and 21% of the Company’s managerial roles, as of December 31, 2023. |
| ● | In 2023, we hired 371 associates, and 62% of those new associates were female and 35% were minorities. |
The Company oversees its equity, diversity, and inclusion efforts through our Doing Good Committee. To further our diversity goals for our workforce, the Company has also implemented programs to foster equality and leadership opportunities for the entire associate base, including events with keynote speakers, panels and forums to gather associate feedback. Our management team also plays an integral part in championing women and minorities in business by hosting networking events, serving on panels and sponsoring relevant events that foster understanding and engagement. Our independent directors Ms. Spring and Ms. Gupta also play a role in mentoring women in leadership positions within our Company. In addition, in 2023, our executive management team and Board of Directors completed inclusive leadership training. The training was also completed by senior leaders across the Company.
| |
2024 Annual Proxy Statement | 21 |
Associate Compensation and Benefits
Our Company offers comprehensive benefits packages to our associates, including medical and prescription drug insurance, dental insurance and vision insurance as well as several voluntary benefit options. Our compensation structure recognizes the individual performance of our associates through merit-based salary increases with a focus on variable pay and paying for performance.
We also encourage our associates to think about their long-term financial stability. Our associates have the opportunity to participate in our 401(k) plan, which includes contribution matches from the Company. Additionally, we offer a stock purchase plan (ESPP) to our associates which allows those who work 20 hours or more per week to purchase shares in our Company at a 10% discount.
Safety and Respect in the Workplace
We are committed to providing a safe and secure work environment in accordance with applicable labor, safety, health, anti-discrimination and other workplace laws. We strive for all of our associates to feel safe and empowered at work. To that end, we maintain a whistleblower hotline that allows associates and others to anonymously voice concerns. We prohibit retaliation against an individual who reported a concern or assisted with an inquiry or investigation.
Governance
As a financial holding company, with two bank subsidiaries, we are subject to an array of laws, many of which are aligned with the goals of ESG, the Community Reinvestment Act, the Bank Secrecy Act, fair lending laws and privacy laws. Our compliance program is designed to ensure that we are in compliance with these laws and regulations. Our program includes, among other things, tailored policies and processes that are reviewed on a regular basis, periodic training on such policies, periodic audits by our compliance team and/or our internal audit team, regular updates to the Audit & Risk Committee and our whistleblower hotline. In addition, our bank subsidiaries go through robust safety and soundness and compliance exams conducted by state and federal bank regulators. Apart from our compliance program and staying true to our core values, our fundamental belief is to operate our business in a transparent manner.
Our full Board is primarily responsible for our ESG strategy and receives quarterly updates. Our Board extensively discusses ESG matters throughout its meetings. In addition, the Audit & Risk Committee receives quarterly written and oral reports on a number of ESG-related topics, including risk management, credit risk, cyber and information security and regulatory compliance, etc. The Nominating & Governance Committee monitors corporate governance trends on an annual basis, including trends relating to ESG, and our Compensation Committee receives periodic updates on our human capital strategy, both from a compensation and benefits perspective.
| |
22 | National Bank Holdings Corporation |
Director Compensation
Compensation Principles. The Nominating and& Governance Committee and the Board believe director compensation should be based upon the following principles:
| ● |
| to align director interests with those of our shareholders, Board compensation should be predominately (at least 50%) equity-based and reinforced by stock ownership requirements; |
| ● |
| director compensation should be sufficient to attract and retain high caliber experienced directors and commensurate with the work required and responsibilities undertaken; and |
| ● |
| to foster management solicitation of director input and minimize administrative burdens, directors should receive annual retainers and not individual meeting fees. |
Compensation Review. Our director compensation structure and amounts were established in November 2012 following our IPO and listing on the NYSE with the assistance of F.W. Cook & Co., Inc. (“F.W. Cook”), the independent compensation consultant that the Nominating and Governance Committee engages for director compensation matters. The Compensation Elements (including amounts) discussed below have not changed since that review, with the exception that the Audit and Risk Committee chair retainer was increased from $20,000 to $30,000 in 2014 to reflect the significant amount of work involved in chairing this combined committee. Lead Director compensation was established in 2014 when the position was established. The Nominating and Governance Committee reviewed recent trends in. In 2023, each director compensation in 2017 and expects to engage F.W. Cook to assist in a review of director compensation later this year.
Compensation Elements. Each independent director receives(other than Mr. Laney) received an annual cash retainer of $60,000$75,000 for his or her service as a member of the Board of Directors, except that the independent Lead Director receivesreceived an additional $10,000 annual cash retainer. Mr. Warren’s retainer was pro-rated for his days of service as a director in 2023 and Ms. Doyle was not appointed until 2024. The chair of the Audit and& Risk Committee receivesreceived an additional annual cash retainer of $30,000 and each of the chairs of the Compensation and Nominating and& Governance Committees receivesreceived an additional annual cash retainer of $20,000. All cash retainers for our directors are paid quarterly, in arrears. In addition, each independent director receives(other than Mr. Laney) received an annual grant of restricted stock with an aggregate grant date fair value of $90,000,$120,000, except that the independent Lead Director receivesreceived an annual grant of restricted stock with an aggregate grant date fair value of $105,000.$140,000. The annual grants are made on the date immediately followingday of our Annual Meeting of Shareholders, with 50% of the shares vesting 180 days following such date and 50% of the shares vesting on the date immediately preceding our next Annual Meeting of Shareholders, in each case, subject to continued service. No individual meeting fees are paid for either Board meetings or committee meetings, whether in person or by telephone. We reimburse directors for expenses incurred in their Board service, including the cost of attending Board and committee meetings. We generally do not provide personal benefits (perquisites) to our directors. Our directors are eligible to participate in the Company’s Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan described in “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan” below. No directors currently participateIn 2023, Ms. Spring participated in the plan.
Compensation Review. Our director compensation structure and amounts are reviewed regularly, with the assistance of our independent compensation consultant. In April, 2023, after a competitive bid process pursuant to which several compensation consultants were considered, the Compensation Committee selected Pay Governance, LLC (“Pay Governance”) as its new independent compensation consultant to assist it with fulfilling its responsibilities related to the oversight of the executive officer and non-employee director compensation. Director compensation was last changed with the guidance our prior compensation consultant, F. W. Cook, for the year beginning 2023.
Stock Ownership Guidelines. We believe ownership of NBHC stock aligns the interests of directors with those of our shareholders and emphasizes the long-term aspects of equity-based compensation. The Board of Directors adoptedUnder the current director stock ownership guidelines (the “Director Stock Ownership Guidelines”) for independent, each of our directors in 2012. Under the Director Stock Ownership Guidelines, our independent directors(other than Mr. Laney) are required to beneficially own shares of NBHC stock worth fourfive times their annual board cash retainer within five years (the “Director Minimum Ownership Threshold”). Independent directorsShares counted for the purposes of the Director Stock Ownership Guidelines includes vested restricted shares and all other shares owned outright. Unvested restricted shares and unexercised stock options do not count towards the threshold. Directors who have not achieved the Director Minimum Ownership Threshold are required to retain 50% of the after-tax portion of vested stock awards.awards until the threshold is met. As of December 31, 2017, each independent director wasMarch 11, 2024, all applicable directors were in compliance with the Director Stock Ownership Guidelines, with all at or above the Director Minimum Ownership Threshold, except for Mr. Zeile,with the exception of Ms. Gupta, who joined the Board on JulyNovember 1, 2016.2021.
Mr. Laney, as an associate of the Company, does not receive separate compensation for his service on the Board of Directors. Information on his compensation is included under the section “Executive Compensation” elsewhere in this proxy statement.
14
| |
2024 Annual Proxy Statement | 23 |
The Compensation for our independent directors (other than Mr. Laney, whose compensation is disclosed in the section entitled “Executive Compensation” below, and Ms. Doyle who did not join our Board until March 2024) during 20172023 was as follows:
20172023 Director Compensation Table
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
|
| Fees earned or paid |
| Stock |
| | |
| | in cash | | awards | | | Total |
Name | | ($)(1) | | ($)(2)(3) | | | ($) |
Ralph W. Clermont |
| 115,000 |
| 140,000 |
| | 255,000 |
Robert E. Dean |
| 95,000 |
| 120,000 |
| | 215,000 |
Alka Gupta | | 75,000 | | 120,000 | | | 195,000 |
Fred J. Joseph |
| 75,000 |
| 120,000 |
| | 195,000 |
Patrick Sobers | | 75,000 | | 120,000 | | | 195,000 |
Micho F. Spring |
| 75,000 | | 120,000 |
| | 195,000 |
Burney S. Warren, III(4) |
| 26,812 |
| — |
| | 26,812 |
Art Zeile | | 95,000 | | 120,000 | | | 215,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Fees earned or paid |
| Stock |
|
|
|
| in cash |
| awards |
| Total |
Name |
| ($) |
| ($)(1) |
| ($) |
Ralph W. Clermont |
| 100,000 |
| 105,000 |
| 205,000 |
Robert E. Dean |
| 80,000 |
| 90,000 |
| 170,000 |
Fred J. Joseph |
| 60,000 |
| 90,000 |
| 150,000 |
Micho F. Spring |
| 60,000 |
| 90,000 |
| 150,000 |
Burney S. Warren, III |
| 80,000 |
| 90,000 |
| 170,000 |
Art Zeile |
| 60,000 |
| 90,000 |
| 150,000 |
| (1) |
|
| (2) | Represents the aggregate grant date fair market value of the restricted stock awards granted to each of our directors (other than Mr. Laney) in 2023, computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation (“FASB ASC Topic 718”), using the valuation assumptions described in Note |
| (3) | As of December 31, 2023, our directors (other than Mr. Laney) held the following unvested restricted stock and option awards: 2,510 shares of unvested restricted stock with respect to Mr. Clermont, 2,151 shares of unvested restricted stock and 15,876 vested options with respect to Mr. Sobers (with all option awards having been granted to Mr. Sobers in connection with his previous service as an executive officer of the Company), and 2,151 shares of unvested restricted stock with respect to Messrs. Dean, Joseph and Zeile and Mses. Spring and Gupta. |
| (4) | Mr. Warren’s term as a director ended on May 9, 2023. |
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS
Related Person Transactions Policy and Procedures
The Board has adopted a written policy that establishes a framework for the review and approval or ratification of transactions between the Company and its related persons and/or their respective affiliated entities. We refer to this policy as our “Related Person Transactions Policy.” The Related Person Transactions Policy is available on our website at www.nationalbankholdings.com.
“Related Persons” under this policy include our directors, director nominees, executive officers, persons who recently served as directors or executive officers, holders of more than 5% of any class of our voting securities and immediate family members of any of the foregoing persons. An “immediate family member” of a related person means any child, stepchild, parent, stepparent, spouse, sibling, mother-in-law, father-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law of a related person and any person (other than a tenant or employee) sharing a household with a related person.
Under the Related Person Transactions Policy, no Related Person Transaction may be consummated or continued unless approved by the Nominating and& Governance Committee.
| |
24 | National Bank Holdings Corporation |
A “Related Person Transaction” is any transaction, arrangement or relationship (or series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships) in which the Company (or any of its subsidiaries) is, was or will be a participant and the amount involved exceeds $120,000, and in which the Related Person had, has or will have a direct or indirect material interest, other than:
| ● |
| employment relationships or transactions involving an executive officer and any related compensation solely resulting from such employment if (i) at any time when the Company is subject to Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the compensation is required to be reported in the Company’s annual proxy statement, and at any time when the Company is not subject to such Sections of the Exchange Act, the compensation is approved by the Compensation Committee of the Company or (ii) the executive officer is not an immediate family member as defined above and such compensation was approved, or recommended to the Board for approval, by the Compensation Committee; |
| ● |
| compensation for serving as a director of the Company; |
| ● |
| payments arising solely from the ownership of the Company's equity securities in which all holders of that class of equity securities received the same benefit on a pro rata basis; |
| ● |
| indebtedness arising from ordinary-course transactions such as the purchases of goods and services at market prices, and indebtedness transactions with any person or entity that is a Related Person only because such person or entity owns more than 5% of any class of the Company’s voting securities; |
| ● |
| transactions where the rates or charges are determined by competitive bids; |
15
| ● |
| transactions where the rates or charges are fixed in conformity with law or governmental authority in connection with the provision of services as a common or contract carrier or public utility; |
| ● |
| ordinary course transactions involving the provision of certain financial services (e.g., by a bank depository, transfer agent, registrar, trustee, etc.). |
The Nominating and& Governance Committee is responsible for approving, ratifying or disapproving of all Related Person Transactions. Prior to the consummation of any Related Person Transaction, Company management is responsible for providing the Nominating and& Governance Committee with all material information regarding the potential Related Person TransactionsTransaction and the interest of any Related Persons in such transactions. The Nominating and& Governance Committee shall only approve or ratify a Related Person Transaction if the committeeit determines that the transaction is in, or not inconsistent with, the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. No member of the Nominating and& Governance Committee shall participate in the review, consideration or approval of any Related Person Transaction with respect to which such member or any member of his or her immediate family is a Related Person.
In the event management determines it is impractical or undesirable to wait until the next meeting of the Nominating and& Governance Committee to approve a Related Person Transaction, the Chair of the Nominating and& Governance Committee may review and approve the Related Person Transaction, in accordance with the criteria set forth herein. The Chair of the Nominating and& Governance Committee will report any such approval to the Nominating and& Governance Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting.
Ordinary Course Transactions
During 20162022 and 2017,2023, certain of the executive officers and directors of the Company, or of NBH Bank ouror Bank of Jackson Hole Trust (our wholly-owned bank subsidiary,subsidiaries), and affiliates of such persons have, from time to time, engaged in banking transactions with NBH Bank and are expected to continue such relationships in the future. All loans or other extensions of credit made by NBH Bank to such individuals were made in the ordinary course of business on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with unaffiliated third parties and did not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features.
Transactions in Connection with the Acquisition of Peoples, Inc.
On January 1, 2018, the Company completed the acquisition (the “Acquisition”) of all of the outstanding shares of Peoples, Inc., a Kansas corporation (“Peoples”), pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Peoples, the Company, the Significant Stockholders (as defined therein) and Winton A. Winter, Jr., solely in his capacity as the Holders’ Representative (the “Merger Agreement”). As a result of the Acquisition, the Significant Shareholders collectively became 5% holders of the Company. Of the cash consideration received by Peoples shareholders in connection with the Acquisition, $10.0 million was set aside in escrow for purposes of funding certain future indemnity claims for a period of three years. Winton A. Winter, Jr., one of the Significant Stockholders, serves as the Holders’ Representative under the escrow agreement with the Company. In addition, Steven Stingley, the brother-in-law of Winton A. Winter, Jr. and husband of Mary Stingley (another Significant Stockholder), continues to be employed as a Senior Advisor of NBH Bank through June 30, 2018. The estimated payments under his employment arrangement are expected to be approximately $125,000 from January 1, 2018 through June 30, 2018. As of the record date, the Significant Stockholders are no longer considered to be 5% holders of the Company.
16
| |
2024 Annual Proxy Statement | 25 |
PROPOSALProposal 2 - RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Audit and& Risk Committee of the Board of Directors has appointed KPMG LLP (“KPMG”) as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2018.2024, and the Audit & Risk Committee has determined that such appointment is in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders. KPMG’s tenure as the auditor of the financial statements of the Company began in 2010, which included auditing the 2009 financial statements. To help ensure the independence of our independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit and& Risk Committee periodicallyoversees the required five year rotation of our lead audit partner and also, on a periodic basis, considers the rotation of our independent registered public accounting firm andfirm. In determining whether to reappoint KPMG, the Audit & Risk Committee also periodically considers, among other things, the following: (1) the advisability and potential impact of selecting a different independent registered public accounting firm.firm, (2) experience auditing banks our size, (3) reasonableness of fees, (4) the quality of communications with the Audit & Risk Committee and management, (5) a review of KPMG’s performance of the annual audit, and (6) a review of the quality initiatives and steps KPMG is taking to improve the quality and efficiency of its audits.
Shareholders will vote atduring the Meeting to ratify such appointment. Representatives from KPMG are expected to be present at the Meeting. They will have an opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
|
|
The Board recommends you vote “FOR” the proposal to ratify the appointment of KPMG as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2024. |
The Board recommends that shareholders vote FOR the proposal to ratify the appointment of KPMG as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2018 (Proposal 2).
KPMGFees
We incurred the fees shown in the following table for professional services provided by KPMG for 20172023 and 2016:2022:
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| 2017 |
| 2016 | ||||
| | | | | ||||
|
| 2023 |
| 2022 | ||||
Audit fees |
| $1,026,962 |
| $1,075,500 | | $1,439,500 | | $1,800,000 |
Audit-related fees |
| — |
| — | | — | | — |
Tax fees |
| — |
| 4,419 | | — | | — |
All other fees |
| 41,067 |
| 82,471 | | — | | — |
Total |
| $1,068,029 |
| $1,162,390 | | $1,439,500 | | $1,800,000 |
Audit Fees. Audit fees principally relate to the audit of our annual financial statements, the review of our quarterly financial statements included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and the audit of our internal control over financial reporting. In addition, 20172023, audit fees includeincluded fees for services related to the reviewacquisition of registration statementsCambr Solutions, LLC. In 2022, audit fees included fees related to the acquisitions of Bancshares of Jackson Hole Incorporated and related consent filings of $27,500.Community Bancorporation.
Audit-Related Fees. Audit-related fees consist of fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and are not reported under “Audit Fees” above. There were no audit-related fees in 20172023 and 2016. 2022.
Tax Fees. Tax fees principally relate to the preparation of tax returns, compliance services, tax planning and consultation services. There were no tax fees paid to KPMG in 2023 and 2022.
All Other Fees. All other fees consist of fees for products and services other than the services reported above. There were no such fees paid to KPMG in 2023 and 2022.
| |
26 | National Bank Holdings Corporation |
Audit and& Risk Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
The Audit and& Risk Committee selects and oversees our independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit and& Risk Committee’s charter requires that the committee pre-approve all audit, audit-related, tax and other services performed by the independent registered public accounting firm, subject to de minimis exceptions for certain non-audit services, so long as such services are approved by the committee prior to the completion of the audit. In approving any non-audit services, the Audit and& Risk Committee considers whether the provision of the services would impair the independent registered public accountant’saccounting firm’s independence.
The Audit and& Risk Committee may delegate pre-approval authority and responsibility to individuals or to designated subcommittees consisting of one or more members of the committee, provided that any such pre-approvals are presented to the committee at its next scheduled meeting. The Audit and& Risk Committee has delegated such pre-approval authority to its Chair.
In 20172023 and 2016,2022, the Audit and& Risk Committee pre-approved all of the audit and non-audit services provided by KPMG.
17
Audit and& Risk Committee Report
The Audit and& Risk Committee’s charter, a copy of which is available on the Investor Relations section of our website at www.nationalbankholdings.com, sets forth the Audit and& Risk Committee’s purposes and responsibilities. The sixseven members of the Audit and& Risk Committee are named below. Each member is independent, as independence for audit committee members is defined by NYSE rules and SEC regulations. The Board has determined, in its business judgment, that each member of the Audit and& Risk Committee is financially literate as required by NYSE rules and that Mr. Clermont and Ms. Doyle each qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by SEC regulations.
Management has primary responsibility for our consolidated financial statements, the overall reporting process, maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for us and, with the assistance of our internal auditors, assessing the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. The Audit & Risk Committee reviews with management the Company’s major financial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor, mitigate, and control such exposures. The independent auditors are responsible for performing an independent audit of our consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”). This audit serves as a basis for the auditors’ opinion included in the annual report to shareholders addressing whether the financial statements fairly present our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017.2023. The Audit and& Risk Committee’s responsibility is to monitor and oversee these processes.
The Audit and& Risk Committee has reviewed and discussed our 20172023 audited consolidated financial statements with management and KPMG. The Audit and& Risk Committee has discussed with KPMG the matters required to be discussed by PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 16,1301, Communications with Audit Committees, including matters relating to the conduct of the audit of our consolidated financial statements. KPMG has provided to the Audit and& Risk Committee the written disclosures and the letter required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding KPMG’s communications with the Audit and& Risk Committee concerning independence, and the Audit and& Risk Committee has discussed with KPMG that firm’s independence from us. Based on this review and these discussions, the Audit and& Risk Committee recommended to the Board that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017,2023, for filing with the SEC.
Current Members of the Audit and& Risk Committee:
Ralph W. Clermont, Chair
Robert E. Dean
Robin Doyle (March 2024)
Alka Gupta
Fred J. Joseph
Micho F. Spring
Burney S. Warren, III
Art Zeile
18
| |
2024 Annual Proxy Statement | 27 |
PROPOSALProposal 3 - ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (SAY-ON-PAY)Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation (Say-on-Pay)
Non-Binding Advisory Vote
The Company seeks your advisory vote on the following resolution to approve the compensation of our named executive officers:
“Resolved, that the shareholders of National Bank Holdings Corporation hereby approve, on an advisory, non-binding basis, the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion.”
Effect of Non-Binding Advisory Vote
This advisory vote is not binding on the Company. Our Board and our Compensation Committee do, however, review the results of the vote and, consistent with our commitment to shareholder engagement, will take it into account in determining executive compensation.
Compensation Philosophy
The Company’s compensation philosophy is designed to attract, develop and retain the talent needed for the organization’s continued success in building a competitive franchise and executing our strategic plan. We intend these programs to be aligned with performance goals that motivate executives to achieve strategic goals prudently and within acceptable risk parameters. Our executive compensation program is designed to reward individual contributions and to create long-term shareholder value. Our compensation philosophy is discussed in greater detail in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section elsewhere in this proxy statement.
Recommendation
The Board encourages you to read both the “Letter to Shareholders from the Compensation Committee” section starting on page 2231 and the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section starting on page 26.35. The Compensation Committee has made significant enhancements in strengthening theis committed to maintaining a strong link between pay and performance to further link compensation to our overall compensation philosophy and explainexplaining the rationale for its pay decisions. For these reasons, we strongly believe you should approve the compensation of our named executive officers.
E prop |
|
The Board recommends you vote “FOR” the proposal to approve the Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation (Say-on-Pay). |
| |
28 | National Bank Holdings Corporation |
Executive Officers
The Board recommends that the shareholders vote FOR the proposal to approve the Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation (Say-on-Pay) (Proposal 3).
The age, business experience and current position of each person who currently serves as an executive officer are as follows (Mr. Zahl became an executive officer as of January 1, 2018):follows:
National Bank Holdings Corporation Executives (the “HoldCo Executives”)
G. Timothy Laney, Age 5763
Biographical information for Mr. Laney is provided in the section “Proposal 1 - Election of Directors” elsewhere in this proxy statement.
Brian F. Lilly,Aldis Birkans, Age 6050
Mr. LillyBirkans has served as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer since 2012 as well asAugust 2018. He currently serves on the Company’sBoard and is Chief Financial Officer of M&A and Strategy since 2014 and currently holds the same positions at NBH Bank. He hasMr. Birkans also served asserves on the Board and is President and Chief Financial Officer of Bank of Jackson Hole Trust, and is a member of NBH Bank’sits Trust Committee. He also serves as a board member of directors since 2016.the USDF Consortium, of which NBHC is a founding member. Prior to joining the Company in 2011, Mr. Lilly is the formerBirkans was a Vice Chairman and Chief Operating OfficerPresident, Assistant Treasurer of F.N.B. Corporation (“FNB”),M&I Bank for five years, where he was responsible for all activities of finance, investor relations, treasury, assetcapital management, investments, corporate liquidity and liability committee, credit administration, risk management technology and operations, legal, facilities and consumer
19
finance. He was a key leader in FNB’s mergers and acquisitions strategy and execution, helping to build FNB into a leading $12 billion regional bank holding company. Priorrelated to the Chief Operating Officer role, he spent six years as FNB’s Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer, having reestablished those functions following the unique spin-off of the company in 2003.bank’s financial activities. In addition, Mr. LillyBirkans worked with PNC Financial for 15 years, principally in line-of-business and geographic Chief Financial Officer roles as well as corporate strategic planning. Mr. Lilly also worked for four years at Ernst & YoungCitigroup as a certified public accountant.
Zsolt K. Besskó, Age 48
Mr. Besskó has served as the Company’s Chief Administrative Officer & General Counsel since 2013 and as the Company’s Chief Human Resources Officer since 2017, and currently oversees our legal, compliance, BSA/AML, human resources, facilities, security/fraud and enterprise technology functions. He has also served as a member of NBH Bank’s board of directors since 2016 and currently serves as the Chief Administrative Officer & Chief Human Resources Officer of NBH Bank. Mr. Besskó brings significant experience in banking, corporate, regulatory, human resources, securities, mergers and acquisitions and corporate governance matters over the span of his 20-plus-year career. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Besskó was a partner with the law firm of Stinson Leonard Street LLP and, prior to that, a shareholder of the law firm of Jones & Keller, P.C. Previously, he served as the ExecutiveSenior Vice President, General Counsel & SecretaryCorporate and Investment Bank Treasury. Mr. Birkans holds a Master of Guaranty Bancorp, a publicly traded bank holding company,Business Administration from Southern Methodist University, where he oversaw the company’s legalalso received his Bachelor’s degree in economics and compliance departments. He began his legal career at Sullivan & Cromwell LLP in New York City. Mr. Besskó currently serves as a member of the Colorado Bankers Association Government Affairs Committee. He also is an Adjunct Professor for the University of Denver Sturm College of Law.finance.
Richard U. Newfield, Jr., Age 5662
Mr. Newfield has served as the Company’s Chief Risk Management Officer since 2011 and currently holds the same position at NBH Bank.Bank and Bank of Jackson Hole Trust. He has also served ascurrently serves on the Board of NBH Bank and Bank of Jackson Hole Trust, and is a member of NBH Bank’s boardthe Trust Committee of directors since 2016.Bank of Jackson Hole Trust. Mr. Newfield is the former Head of Business Services Credit at Regions Bank. He joined Regions in 2008 after a 23-year career at Bank of America. Mr. Newfield held various senior positions at Bank of America, including roles in risk management, credit, commercial banking, global bank debt and corporate marketing. He brings significant experience in the development and implementation of business models and integration of businesses during mergers. In addition, Mr. Newfield has led credit process reengineering initiatives, including risk and credit policy design, and other corporate governance initiatives.
Angela N. Petrucci, Age 47
Ms. Petrucci has served as the Company’s Chief Administrative Officer and General Counsel since July 2020 and currently holds the same positions at NBH Bank and Bank of Jackson Hole Trust. She currently oversees our legal, BSA/AML, marketing and project management, and human resources functions. She is a member of NBH Bank and Bank of Jackson Hole Trust’s board of directors, and a member of the Trust Committee of Bank of Jackson Hole Trust. Ms. Petrucci currently serves as an advisory board member of the Young Americans Center for Financial Education. She is also a member of the Colorado Bankers Association Government Affairs Committee and the American Bankers Association Bank PAC Committee. Prior to joining the Company in 2015, Ms. Petrucci was in-house counsel at Accenture, overseeing corporate governance and securities matters. Prior to that, she was an associate at the law firm of Chapman and Cutler LLP in Chicago, IL. Before attending law school, Ms. Petrucci was a commercial banker at First Chicago Bank (now JP Morgan Chase). Ms. Petrucci brings significant experience in banking, corporate transactional, securities and corporate governance matters over the span of her 25-plus-year career.
| |
2024 Annual Proxy Statement | 29 |
NBH Bank Executives (the “Bank Executives”)
Whitney A. Bartelli, Age 49
Ms. Bartelli has served as NBH Bank’s Chief Marketing Officer since August 2015 and has served as President of Bank Midwest, a division of NBH Bank, since November 2015. She was previously the Director of Marketing since 2012. Ms. Bartelli has also served as a member of NBH Bank’s board of directors since January 2017. In her roles, she leads community building initiatives, integrated brand strategy and marketing programs, and product development and client service initiatives. Ms. Bartelli has more than 25 years of experience in financial services with a core expertise in branding, marketing and communications. Prior to joining NBH Bank in 2012, Ms. Bartelli was Senior Vice President of Retail Brand Strategy and Management at Bank of America, where she led brand-building initiatives for the card, deposits, small business and home loans lines of business. Ms. Bartelli is involved in many organizations throughout the community, including the board of directors for the Greater Kansas City Chamber of Commerce, where she serves as the Vice-Chair for the Executive Women’s Leadership Council, Kansas City Central Exchange, and the board of directors for Hope House.
Christopher S. Randall, Age 5157
Mr. Randall has served as NBH Bank’s Executive Vice President and Head of Commercial and Specialty Banking since August 2015 and, prior2015. Prior to that, he was Senior Managing Director, Specialty Banking since 2013. He has also served asis a member of NBH Bank’s board of directors since January 2017.2017, and a member of the Bank of Jackson Hole Trust’s board of directors. Mr. Randall has over 27 yearscurrently serves as an advisory board member of leadership experience building successful commercial bankingLightspring Capital and specialty finance and investing business, providing debt and equity capital to lower middle market business acrossis an external advisory partner of Coastline Capital. Mr. Randall was a Trustee of the U.S.University of Colorado Foundation, supporting all campuses of the University of Colorado System. Prior to joining NBH Bank, in 2013, Mr. Randall was the Directordirector and Founderfounder of CoBiz Structured Finance, based in Denver, Colorado, since 2011. Previously, he was an executive of the
20
Marquette Financial Companies as Senior Managing Director, COO and Board Memberboard member of MFC Capital Funding, a Chicago, Illinois-based national specialty finance and investing business that was started in 2005. Mr. Randall ishas over 30 years of leadership experience building a Trustee ofsuccessful commercial banking and specialty finance business, providing debt and equity capital to lower middle market business across the University of Colorado Foundation, supporting all campuses of the University of Colorado System.U.S.
Patrick G. Sobers,Ruth Stevenson, Age 6074
Mr. SobersMs. Stevenson has served as NBH Bank’s Chief Client Executive Vice Presidentsince the merger of Peoples, Inc. in January 2018, and Head of Business and Consumer Banking since April 2016 and has served as President of Community Banks of Colorado, a division of NBH Bank, since November 2016. He was previously the Deposit Operations Executive Vice President and Head of Small Business and Consumer Banking for NBH Bank’s Community Banks of Colorado and Hillcrest divisions since 2012 and 2015, respectively. Mr. Sobers has also served asfrom 2018 to 2023. Ms. Stevenson is a member of NBH Bank’s board of directors since January 2017. Mr. Sobers has over 30 years of experience in the financial services industry. Prior to joining NBH Bank in 2012, he held several leadership positions at Bank of America, including as the Southeast Region’s Consumer Banking Executive; as Customer Service2019, and Solutions Executive; as Premier Banking and Investments Regional Executive for Florida and Georgia (now Merrill Lynch Wealth Management); and as Tampa Market President. Mr. Sobers has been very active in the communities where he has resided, serving on the boards of numerous civic and charitable organizations. He is currently a member of the Foundation BoardBank of Jackson Hole Trust’s board of directors. Ms. Stevenson also currently serves as a board member of the Moffitt Cancer CenterOffice of the State Banking Commissioner for the State of Kansas. Prior to the merger, Ms. Stevenson served in a number of roles with Peoples Bank over an 18-year period, including President and the TreasurerChief Operating Officer and as a member of its board of directors. Ms. Stevenson has worked in a variety of roles in financial services for Third Way Center.more than 45 years, including President of a community bank, Director of Retail, Director of a mortgage division, Operations Manager for a mortgage division, and nearly every other capacity in banking and mortgage.
Brendan W. Zahl, Age 4248
Mr. Zahl has served as NBH Bank’s Executive Vice President, Personal, Private and Residential Banking, and as the President of Community Banks of Colorado since 2021. Since joining the Company in 2018, Mr. Zahl has served in various capacities including Executive Vice President, Head of Residential Banking as well as the Executive Vice President, Head of Premier, Private and Market President for the Colorado Springs Region since the merger of Peoples, Inc. and the Company on January 1, 2018.Residential Banking. He has also servedserves as a member of NBH Bank’sBank and Bank of Jackson Hole Trust’s board of directors. Mr. Zahl currently is a member of the Colorado Bankers Association board of directors, since such time.and serves on the Property Committee of Partners in Housing and is the Chair of the FCA Southern Colorado Region Advisory Board. Prior to the merger, Mr. Zahl served as President and CEO of Peoples National Bank. Mr. Zahl began his banking career at FirstBank in Colorado Springs, CO.Colorado. After a decade at FirstBank, he moved to Peoples National Bank in 2007 to take over Retail and Lending Management. HeManagement and was promoted to President and CEO of Peoples National Bank in 2012. Mr. Zahl currently serves on the Board and as the Chairman-Elect of the Colorado Bankers Association and the Board of Partners in Housing. Mr. Zahl has held several board, advisory, and volunteer roles with many other community organizations including Partners in Housing, Junior Achievement, United Way, Rotary International, and Habitat for Humanity. Mr. Zahlattended the University of Nebraska, where he was a member of two national championship football teams and graduated with honors with a Business Administration degree. He is also a graduate of the Graduate School of Banking, Madison, Wisconsin.
21
| |
30 | National Bank Holdings Corporation |
Executive Compensation
FROM THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
Fellow Shareholders,
Our Board and Compensation Committee continues to ensure that our executive compensation program is designed to pay for performance, while allowing the Company to attractalign executive compensation with shareholder interests. We also focus on attracting and retainretaining the talent that is essential to the successful execution ofproviding vision, developing strategy and successfully executing our long-term strategy. The Board and the Compensation Committee believe in, and areremain committed to providing clear and comprehensive disclosure to help you understand how (i)(1) our executive compensation plansprograms are structured, (ii)(2) we assess performance and (iii) this(3) performance leads to pay outcomes that are aligned with your best interests.
2017 Accomplishments2023YearinReview
On January 1, 2018,In a year of heightened industry concern, we closedwere able to deliver record full year net income and a record return on average tangible common equity. In addition, the Company continued to further its digital strategy with continued development of 2UniFiSM, a platform for small and medium sized businesses that will provide access to digital payment tools, under the safety of a regulated bank. We also further diversified our sources of funding and added another source of fee income via the strategic acquisition of Peoples, Inc.Cambr Solutions, LLC (“Cambr”), which expandsa technology platform that provides access to core deposits from accounts offered through financial technology companies that provide us with a truly unique source of liquidity.
We also raised money for local charities through our community bank footprint in highly-attractiveeighth Do More Charity Challenge and geographically-relevant marketsfirst inaugural Do More Concert, and increased our total assets $0.9 million to $5.7 billion. volunteerism in our local communities.
2023 Financial Achievements
The acquisition also addsCompany achieved record financial performance despite a best-in-class, franchise-centric residential banking platform to deepen our offering to clients. The additionyear of top banking talent, expanded residential banking products and a strong presence in new and attractive markets that strategically align to our core footprint have made this transaction a meaningful growth accelerator for our young Company.industry challenges:
As we continue to evolve and grow our market share, the Company also achieved several other significant accomplishments in 2017, including the following:
| ● |
|
|
| ● |
|
|
| ● |
|
| ● | Generated a record full year return on average tangible common equity of 18.2%.1 |
| ● |
|
| ● | Delivered loan growth of 6.6% driven by strong loan originations of $1.5 billion. |
| ● | Grew average total deposits by $1.3 billion or 18.7%. |
1 Represents a non-GAAP measure. Please refer to Appendix A for a reconciliation of these measures.
Long Term Performance
As a Company, our strong fundamentals and conservative principles we put in place since our inception have enabled us to support our clients, associates and communities. In 2023, we achieved record earnings per diluted share.
The results of our efforts have helped secure our status as a leading regional bank franchise. As we look ahead, we will remain focused on our core bank franchise as well as enhancing our capabilities through our 2UniFiSM digital strategy, the expansion of our trust and wealth business and growth of our new Cambr business.
| |
2024 Annual Proxy Statement | 31 |
1Represents a Non-GAAP measure. Earnings per share has been adjusted in 2022 for $28.3 million of acquisition expenses, after-tax.
| |||
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CEO Compensation
Our philosophy for our CEO compensation is heavily weighted towards measures that directly align with shareholder value creation and is reviewed annually in consultation with the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant, Pay Governance.
In 2023, the Compensation Committee held CEO base salary flat. The majority of our CEO’s compensation remains based on achieving specified performance metrics. The total amount of our CEO’s at-risk pay (Short-Term Incentive and Long-Term Incentive) and overall total compensation for 2021, 2022 and 2023 were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Year | Salary (Cash) | Short Term Incentive (Cash) | Long-Term Incentive (Equity) | All other Compensation | Total Compensation | |
2023 | $850,000 | $1,114,350 | $1,441,511 | $172,240 | $3,578,101 | |
2022 | $826,9231 | $1,302,404 | $1,049,904 | $111,158 | $3,290,389 | |
2021 | $750,000 | $1,012,500 | $1,186,6722 | $60,375 | $3,009,547 | |
1The CEO’s salary increased from $750,000 to $850,000 effective March 27, 2022.
2In 2021 the Compensation Committee reduced the cash payment under the 2020 STIP and shifted $136,750 of the cash amount to a grant of restricted stock.
Shareholder Engagement & 20172023 Say-on-Pay Advisory Vote
At our 20172023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, we received virtually unanimous shareholder support of 99.3%were pleased to receive a 95.3% vote in favor of our executive compensation. We believecompensation (Say-on-Pay). Our record of shareholder engagement is strong, beginning with the broad support reflects the Board’s and the Compensation Committee’s commitment to understanding the views of the Company’s shareholders and ensuring the alignment of executive pay with company performance.
Since the Company’s inception, the Company’s senior management team (primarily, theregular meetings that our CEO and CFO) has regularly engagedChief Financial Officer (“CFO”) hold with our shareholdersinvestors at various conferences and meetings and conferences. Additionally, beginning in 2015,throughout the Board andyear. In addition, the Compensation Committee established aCompany conducts an annual post-meeting shareholder engagement process with management to annually engage with shareholders regarding our executive compensation program, including corporate governance matters with the corporate governance teams of our institutional investors.
Our shareholder engagement cycle has resulted in meaningfulshareholders to understand any concerns or other feedback over the past few years, including the changes that the Compensation Committee implemented toregarding our executive compensation program as further described under “Evolution of our Executive Compensation Program” below.and governance practices. As we have implemented these changes, our shareholders have been very receptive to and supportivepart of the changes made, which we believe was demonstrated by the extremely high level of shareholder support last year with respect to our say-on-pay proposal.
22
In continuing our outreach this year,process, we contacted shareholders representing over 65% of the shares outstanding, and very few shareholders expressed a specific need for a meeting or dialogue. The significant shareholders that we did engage with (representing 26% of the shares outstanding) reaffirmed that they had no concerns with our current executive compensation program. The meetings with these investors centered more on a discussionthan 57.2% of our recent acquisition of Peoples, Inc. as well as other topics such asshares outstanding.
Our engagement meetings discussed our practices and their views regarding compensation, sustainability, board diversitycomposition and sustainability. The feedback from these engagements are shared withgovernance matters. We discussed our efforts in ESG and evaluated by our Compensation Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee, as applicable, and ultimately considered in connection with the evaluation of Company’s executive compensation program and corporate governance policies.
Company History and Financial Considerations
We continue to believe that a historical perspective of the formation and development of the Company and our financial circumstances is helpful in understanding the evolution and maturation of our executive compensation program. The Company was formed in late 2009 through a private capital raise of $1.0 billion during the depths of the financial crisis, with no banking operations or assets. Our strategy at this early stage of our life was to acquire failed or troubled banks with the goal of creating a leading regional bank franchise that would deliver meaningful value to its communities and investors. At this point, our expectation was to build an organization that would ultimately exceed $10 billion in assets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*For a complete description of the activity incurred, please refer to the Company’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC for the fiscal years ended 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015 as well as the earnings releases furnished with the SEC on Form 8-K for the same periods.
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In summary,actions taken over the past seven years, the Company has transformed into one collective banking operation with steadily increasing organic growth, prudent underwriting, meaningful market share,year. In our discussions, shareholders provided feedback on our corporate governance practices, ESG efforts and continued opportunity for expansion. In addition, as a result of the acquisition of Peoples, Inc., the Company is now $5.7 billion in total assets.
Evolution of Our Executive Compensation Program
As the foundation for executing our business strategy, the Board sought to ensure the right management team was hired, in place and properly incentivized to achieve the Company’s strategic goals of transforming a group of acquired troubled banks into a single, sound banking operation and build a leading community bank franchise. As a result, there were two key elements of compensation in our early years: significant performance-based equity awards (restricted stock and stock options) to align the executives’ interests with those of shareholders while recognizing the risk inherent in building a new enterprise, and annual cash incentives to successfully deploy capital, operationalize our company and drive organic growth. In light of our early stage of development during a time of economic uncertainty, a comprehensive system of individual objectives tailored to each executive’s unique role was developed with cash incentives discretionarily determined by the Committee at the end of the year basedprovided their perspective on an in-depth review of performance.
As the Company continued to evolve between 2013 and 2015, so did the executive compensation program. During this period, we established more typical corporate and business unit objectives for our annual cash incentive bonus programboard composition and a more consistent, annual equity award program in the form of time-based restricted stock and stock options, with a primary focus on retention.none expressed any major concerns.
In 2015 and 2016, our Compensation Committee further refined our program, including taking input from an active shareholder engagement process, and implemented the following changes to further strengthen the alignment between pay and performance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
In 2017, the Compensation Committee continued to build upon the framework established in 2015 and 2016, marking the second year of long-term performance based equity awards and a short term incentive plan that aligns with the Company’s key financial accomplishments in 2017.
2017 CEO Compensation
Our CEO’s total compensation for 2017 was $2.7 million, compared to $2.3 million in 2016 and $2.4 million in 2015. Based upon the Company’s 2017 performance results, the Compensation Committee and the Board awarded our CEO an annual cash incentive payout at 129% of target, or $868,000, compared to $482,000 in 2016 and $834,000 in 2015. Our CEO’s base salary has remained at the same level since 2014 at $750,000.
Summary
The Board and the executive team remain committed to moving your companyCompany forward with onea clear priority:priority of: delivering superior growth and performance for you, our shareholders. The Board and the Compensation Committee have the utmost confidence in the talent and determination of the executive team as we work to continue to execute on our long-term strategy and deliver value to our shareholders.
The Board and the Compensation Committee are also committed to ensuring the link between executive compensation and shareholder value creation is strong. We are confident that the changes to our program enhance this alignment. As always, we are committed to improving our compensation and disclosure practices and we will continue to evaluate our current compensation practices and monitor emerging best practices.
In its capacity as the Compensation Committee of the Board, theThe Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the following Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”). Based on this review and these discussions, the Compensation Committee has recommended to the Board that the CD&A be included in this proxy statement and incorporated by reference in our 2023 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 for filing with the SEC.
| |
2024 Annual Proxy Statement | 33 |
We thank you for taking the time to read our disclosure and encourage you to vote in favor of our approach to executive compensation.
Sincerely,
National Bank Holdings Corporation Compensation Committee
| | |
/s/ | /s/ Ralph W. Clermont | |
| | |
Art Zeile | Ralph W. Clermont | |
Chair | | |
| | |
/s/ Alka Gupta | /s/ Robert E. Dean | |
| | |
Alka Gupta | Robert E. Dean |
|
25
| |
34 | National Bank Holdings Corporation |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Introduction
In this section, which we refer to as the “CD&A”, we explain how we compensate the executive officers named in the “Summary Compensation Table” below (our “Named Executive Officers” or “NEOs”). Our NEOs for 20172023 were:
| ● |
| G. Timothy Laney, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
| ● |
|
|
| ● |
|
|
| Richard U. Newfield, Jr., EVP, Chief Risk Management Officer |
| ● |
|
| ● |
|
Our approach to executive compensation is to pay for performance and to align compensation programs with effective risk management. We believe this approach to compensation will create sustainable shareholder value over the long term.
Philosophy, Objectives, Components and Highlights of Our Executive Compensation Program
Philosophy
We are at our best when we are providing peopleour clients with banking advice and services that help.help them be successful. When we do this in accordance with our core values, it is a win-win for clients and the community. Because a key expectation of management is to build an effective organizational structure, it is particularly important that our executive compensation program be designed to attract, develop and retain the talent needed for the organization’s continued success in building a competitive franchise and executing our strategic plan. We intend this program to be aligned with performance goals that motivate executives to achieve our strategic goals prudently and within acceptable risk parameters. Our executive compensation program is designed to reward individual contributions and to create long-term shareholder value.
Objectives
Our executive compensation philosophy is designed to meet five key objectives:
| ● |
| ensure that the goals and interests of management are closely aligned with those of the Company, our shareholders, our clients and the communities we serve; |
| ● |
| balance compensation to reward both short-term results and the strategic decisions and actions required to build a sustainable enterprise and create long-term value; |
| ● |
| motivate executives to deliver a high level of business performance and prudently achieve strategic goals within acceptable risk parameters; |
| ● |
| pay compensation based on corporate and individual performance; and |
| ● |
| attract and retain highly qualified executives through a balance of cash and equity compensation. |
| |
2024 Annual Proxy Statement | 35 |
The total compensation of our NEOs consists primarily of the following components:
| | | | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CompensationComponent | Purpose | Considerations | ||
Base Salary: Cash | | |||
|
|
| ||
| To provide a fixed amount of cash compensation reflective of level and scope of responsibility and competitive practice. | | NEO salary levels are based on:
| |
| | | |
26
| ||||
| |
|
| |
| To motivate and reward our NEOs for meeting or exceeding corporate, business line and individual performance goals. | | ■ The annual short-term incentive for HoldCo Executives is 70% ■ The annual short-term incentive for Bank Executives is | |
| | | | |
Long-Term Incentive Compensation:
| | Equity compensation links performance with the interests of our shareholders, promotes a long-term focus, and acts as an effective retention tool for key talent. | | ■50% of the ■ 30% of the ■ 20% of the value is in the form of stock options This results in 70% of equity compensation being performance-based when stock options are |
| |
36 | National Bank Holdings Corporation |
CompensationComponent | Purpose | Considerations | ||
Long-Term Incentive Compensation: 2UniFi Profits Interests | | Profits interests in 2UniFi, LLC (in the form of Class B Units) promotes a long term focus on the growth and success of 2UniFi. | | ■Profits interest awards in 2UniFi, LLC (in the form of Class B Units), which provides the opportunity to share in the future growth of 2UniFi only if the business value grows following the grant date. The profits interests create a direct incentive for our executives to generate operating results that drive long-term appreciation in the value of 2UniFi, LLC. The profits interest awards also support retention goals as the awards vest over 5 years, subject to continuous service. |
| | | | |
Benefits & Perquisites | | Benefits are designed to be generally competitive with other banking institutions. | |
|
| | | | |
Change in Control and Severance | | Employment agreements or change of control agreements, which include severance benefits and certain change in control benefits, are intended to reinforce and encourage the continued attention and dedication of our NEOs. | | Change in control and severance arrangements also are an effective tool in attracting and retaining talent. |
Compensation Best Practices
Best practices we have implemented with respect to our executive compensation program include the following:
| ● |
| Stock Ownership Guidelines. Our |
| ● |
| Anti-Hedging/Pledging Policy. Our Insider Trading Policy prohibits hedging or short sales involving Company |
| ● |
| Double-trigger Acceleration of Equity. |
| ● |
|
|
| ● |
| Independent Compensation Consultant. The Compensation Committee engages |
| ● |
| Clawbacks. |
| |
2024 Annual Proxy Statement | 37 |
27
| ● |
| Risk Assessment. The Compensation Committee oversees a risk assessment of our compensation program that is performed annually. |
| ● |
| Pay for Performance. |
| ● |
|
|
| ● |
| No Tax Gross Ups on Change in Control Payments. The Company does not provide for tax gross |
| ● |
| Prohibition on Repricing of Stock |
Setting Compensation for our Named Executive Officers
Executive compensation is set by the Compensation Committee, in collaboration with the compensation consultant and management.
Role of Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee determines executive compensation. The Compensation Committee, comprised entirely of independent directors, sets compensation policy and administers our executive compensation program. The Compensation Committee acts independently, but works closely with our Board of Directors and members of management. The Compensation Committee has responsibility for setting the components of the CEO’s compensation and uses the assistance of F.W. Cook,Pay Governance, its independent compensation consultant, in determining executive compensation. The Chairman of our Compensation Committee takes an active role in meeting with F.W. Cook.Pay Governance. Our CEO, with the assistance of F.W. CookPay Governance and our Chief Administrative Officer, develops initial recommendations for the other NEOs for the Compensation Committee’s consideration.
Role of Independent Compensation Consultant
The Compensation Committee engages its own advisors to assist in carrying out its responsibilities. The Compensation Committee has engaged F.W. Cookthe authority to adviseengage an external compensation consultant to assist them by providing information, analysis and supportother advice relating to the compensation of our NEOs. The compensation consultant reports directly to the Compensation Committee. In April, 2023, after a competitive bid process pursuant to which several compensation consultants were considered, the Compensation Committee onselected Pay Governance as its new independent compensation decisions. Atconsultant to assist with fulfilling its responsibilities related to the directionoversight of the Compensation Committee, F.W. Cook assists in collectingexecutive officer and analyzing market data on compensation and provides expert knowledge of competitive practices and trends as well as developments in regulatory and technical matters. F.W. Cook has no other relationships with the Company (other than advising the Nominating and Governance Committee on matters related tonon-employee director compensation).compensation. As part of the engagement of F.W. CookPay Governance in 2017,2023, the Compensation Committee considered the independence factors required under the NYSE corporate governance standards, including the applicable SEC rules, and determined that F.W. CookPay Governance was independent.
Role of Management
Our CEO and Chief Administrative Officer assist the Compensation Committee in designing and managing our executive compensation program. Our CEO attends meetings and makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee on the compensation of other NEOs. Our CEO and Chief Administrative Officer assist the Compensation Committee in designing our programs. Our Chief Risk Management Officer advises the Compensation Committee on risk mitigation and assessment of compensation risk. None of our NEOs provides recommendations with respect to their own compensation.
| |
38 | National Bank Holdings Corporation |
Market Data Review
Market pay levels and practices, including those of a self-selected peer group, are one of many factors the Compensation Committee considers in making executive compensation decisions. Market information provides an external frame of reference on the range and reasonableness of compensation levels and practices, and is used as a data point in decision-making and not as a primary factor. Internal considerations, competitive factors and the Company’s evolution are other factors the Compensation Committee considers in setting executive compensation. In early 2023, the Compensation Committee used the following Peer Group as recommended by F. W. Cook, (the Compensation Committee’s prior Independent Compensation Consultant) in setting executive compensation for 2023 (the “2022 Compensation Peer Group”):
| |
Amerant Bancorp | Independent Bank Corp. |
Brookline Bancorp Inc. | Lakeland Financial Corporation |
ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. | OceanFirst Financial Corp. |
Customers Bancorp | Pathward Financial (Formerly Meta Financial) |
CVB Financial Corp. | Preferred Bank |
Eagle Bancorp Inc. | Southside Bancshares, Inc. |
Enterprise Financial Services | The Bancorp, Inc. |
First Foundation | The Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc. |
Flushing Financial Corporation | TrustCo Bank Corp. NY |
Heritage Financial Corporation | Veritex Holdings, Inc. |
The peer group2022 Compensation Peer Group was reviewed in 2017August of 2023 by F.W. Cook,Pay Governance, with input from the Compensation Committee and management. The directive from the Compensation Committee over the past few years has beenin 2023 for setting executive compensation for 2024 was to target a peer groupcompanies with a median asset size closerfocus in Fintech to $6 to $7 billion in order to better align withrecognize the Company’s current size and strategy (which focuses
28
on attaining an asset size of $6 to $8 billion). As a result of the acquisition of Peoples, Inc., the Company is now $5.7 billion in total assets.evolving business model. After substantial review and consideration, the Compensation Committee approved the following peer group of 1820 institutions (the ““2023 Compensation Peer Group”): for setting executive compensation for 2024:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brookline Bancorp Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. |
|
Customers Bancorp | Pathward Financial |
CVB Financial Corp. | Preferred Bank |
Eagle Bancorp Inc. | The Bancorp, Inc. |
Enterprise Financial Services | The Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc. |
First Foundation | Triumph Financial |
Flushing Financial Corporation | Veritex Holdings, Inc. |
The companies in
In our 2023 peer group analysis, we shifted the Compensation Peer Group have a medianprimary focus from asset size of $6.8 billion (as of June 30, 2017), ranging from approximately $3 billion to $9.5 billion. In addition tomedian market capitalization. Although we did consider other factors, asset size other factors consideredcontinued to be reviewed, as did revenue size, geography, investment in selecting peers included geography,Fintech, complexity of the organization, and similarity of business lines and services and products offered to those of the Company. The companies in the 2023 Compensation Peer Group have a median market capitalization of $1 billion (as of June 30, 2023), ranging from approximately $265 million to approximately $2.3 billion. We believe the peers selected are a diverse group of financial institutions that provide the necessary breadth to be meaningful in evaluating NEO compensation. The Compensation Peer Group is reviewed annually and may be changed to reflect M&A activity and other items deemed relevant by the Compensation Committee.
F.W. CookPay Governance summarized and provided the Compensation Committee with market data relating to base salaries, short-term cash bonuses, long-term equity awards, and total compensation for each of the top five officers at these peer companies, using the data provided in the peer company’s latest available proxy statement. The Compensation Committee also considers regional, as well as survey data from a larger segment of companies within the financial services industry. The Compensation Committee considered this information, together with other factors discussed in this CD&A, in determining NEO compensation.
| |
2024 Annual Proxy Statement | 39 |
Executive Compensation Framework
Beginning in 2015, theThe Compensation Committee implemented three substantial shiftsbelieves in variable compensation and paying for performance. This is demonstrated by the amount of at-risk pay with respect to its executivethe NEOs. For 2023, 71% of our CEO’s compensation program, namely: 1) a shift in the mix of incentive compensation by reducing the annual cash incentive opportunitywas at-risk and increasing the long-term equity opportunity; 2) a shift to more objective metrics in determining the annual incentive payments, and 3) a shift in equity compensation towards performance-based awards.
As a result of these changes, the Compensation Committee targets approximately 57%60% of the CEO’s total compensation to be performance based, as reflected below. for all other NEOs was at-risk.
29
The Compensation Committee made the following determinations with respect to each of the compensation components further described below.
Base Salary
In 2017,2023, the Compensation Committee, in conjunction with its annual review of peer data, reviewed market data provided by its Independent Compensation Consultant, which included both total compensation and overall salary levels relative to peers. In connection with that review the Compensation Committee determined thatto increase base salaries for our NEOs should remain unchanged (theeach of the HoldCo Executives’ base salaries have remainedExecutives, with the same since 2014), with exception of Mr. Sobers,Laney whose salary increased by 12% in connection with his increasing responsibilities and a reviewremained flat, as follows (effective as of competitive market data. The decision to leave the salariesMarch 26, 2023):
| ● | Mr. Laney’s base salary was unchanged and remained at $850,000. In arriving at this decision, the Compensation Committee considered that Mr. Laney’s salary had a meaningful increase in 2022. |
| ● | The Compensation Committee determined to increase Mr. Birkans base salary from $386,000 to $495,000. Mr. Birkans salary was increased as a result of his expanded scope of responsibilities and oversight of new key business lines as well as his overall strong performance as a Chief Financial Officer. |
| ● | The Compensation Committee determined to increase Mr. Newfield’s salary from $386,000 to $412,000. Mr. Newfield’s increase was primarily in recognition of the continued strong credit quality of the Company and continued regulatory relationships and risk management responsibilities. |
| ● | The Compensation Committee determined to increase Ms. Petrucci’s base salary from $315,000 to $330,000 in response to her continued growth and development in her role as Chief Administrative Officer and General Counsel. |
| ● | Mr. Randall’s base salary was increased from $290,000 to $330,000 for his strong performance in 2023 and continued oversight of the Business Banking Group and further development of key leadership within his departments. |
| |
40 | National Bank Holdings Corporation |
In February 2018, the Compensation Committee determined that base salaries for all of our NEOs should remain unchanged for 2018 for similar reasons.
Annual Cash Incentive Compensation
2017 Executive Short-Term Cash Incentive ProgramPlan Compensation
2023 Executive Short-Term Incentive Plan Design
The Compensation Committee awards cash incentive compensation pursuant to the terms of the 2017 Executive Short-Term Cash Incentive Program (the “20172023 STIP,”), which was established pursuant to the 20142023 Omnibus Incentive Plan. Under the 20172023 STIP, the Compensation Committee cappedminimum payout is 0% if certain thresholds are not met, and the maximum payout at 150%is 157.5% of the target opportunity for the HoldCo executives in the event of exceptional individual performance, and 192.5% with respect to Mr. Randall in the followingevent of exceptional line of business performance or exceptional individual performance. The below reflects the payout opportunity structure:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||||||
Named executive officer | | | Base | | Threshold |
| | Threshold | | Target as |
| | Target | | Maximum | | | Maximum | |||
G. Timothy Laney | | $ | 850,000 | | 50% | | $ | 425,000 | | 100% | | $ | 850,000 | | 157.5% | | $ | 1,338,750 | |||
Aldis Birkans | | $ | 469,846 | | 50% | | $ | 176,192 | | 75% | | $ | 352,385 | | 157.5% | | $ | 555,006 | |||
Richard U. Newfield, Jr. | | $ | 406,000 | | 50% | | $ | 131,950 | | 65% | | $ | 263,900 | | 157.5% | | $ | 415,642 | |||
Angela N. Petrucci | | $ | 326,538 | | 50% | | $ | 97,962 | | 60% | | $ | 195,923 | | 157.5% |
| $ | 308,579 | |||
Christopher S. Randall | | $ | 320,769 | | 50% | | $ | 88,212 | | 55% | | $ | 176,423 | | 192.5% | | $ | 339,614 | |||
| (1) | Amounts in this column reflects the earnings paid in 2023 (“STIP Eligible Earnings”). |
Named executive officer | Base | Threshold | Threshold | Target as | Target | Maximum | Maximum |
G. Timothy Laney | $ 750,000 | 50% | $ 337,500 | 90% | $ 675,000 | 150% | $ 1,012,500 |
Brian F. Lilly | $ 375,000 | 50% | $ 140,625 | 75% | $ 281,250 | 150% | $ 421,875 |
Zsolt K. Besskó | $ 315,000 | 50% | $ 94,500 | 60% | $ 189,000 | 150% | $ 283,500 |
Richard U. Newfield, Jr. | $ 325,000 | 50% | $ 97,500 | 60% | $ 195,000 | 150% | $ 292,500 |
Patrick G. Sobers* | $ 260,673 | 50% | $ 58,651 | 45% | $ 117,303 | 150% | $ 175,954 |
*Mr. Sobers’ salary is reflective of salary increases during the year.2023 STIP Structure
In its establishment of the 20172023 STIP, the Compensation Committee determined that payouts should be based on the attainment of quantitative financial metrics as well as a qualitative assessment of certain objectives and individual performance. The Compensation Committee determined that with respect to the HoldCo Executives,Messrs. Laney, Newfield, Birkans and Ms. Petrucci, 70% of the total cash incentive2023 STIP bonus should be based on the attainment of specific quantitative financial metrics (“HoldCo Metrics”) as interpolated for performance between threshold, target and maximum levels of performance. With respect to Mr. Sobers,Randall, the Compensation Committee determined that 35%10% of the total cash incentive2023 STIP bonus should be based upon the attainment of the specific quantitative financialsame HoldCo metrics, applicable to the HoldCo Executives, and that 50%70% should be based upon the performance of the Business and Consumer Banking Group.business groups that he leads. There is no payout with respect to a given metric if the threshold level of performance is not achieved.
The financial metrics and relative targets established are a reflection of what the Compensation Committee deemed important in the beginning of 2023 to align the NEOs’ performance with the achievement of the Company’s strategic goals andfor 2023 as well as key long-term financial targets. Specifically, Core Net Income and Asset Quality (Non-Performing Assets Ratio)(each as defined below) were selected as the most important metrics in driving overall corporate performance of the HoldCo executives while line of business-specific loan and deposit growth as well as line of business contribution were each deemed important for Mr. Randall.
In addition, with respect to the HoldCo Executives,Messrs. Laney, Newfield, Birkans and Ms. Petrucci, the Compensation Committee determined that the remaining 30% of the 2017 cash incentive2023 STIP bonus should be based on a qualitative assessment, with 15% of the cash incentive bonus2023 STIP based on Enterprise Risk Management (“ERM”) and ESG efforts and the remaining 15% based upon an individual assessment of the HoldCo Executive,each officer, as further described below. With respect to Mr. Sobers,Randall, the Compensation Committee determined that the remaining 15%20% of the 2017 cash incentive2023 STIP bonus should be based on a qualitative assessment, with 7.5% of the cash incentive bonus5% based on Enterprise Risk ManagementERM and ESG efforts, and the remaining 7.5%15% based upon anhis individual assessment, of Mr. Sobers, as further described below.
2023 STIP Goal Setting
In establishing the performance metrics for the 20172023 STIP, the Compensation Committee focused on the financial metrics that play the most significant role in driving the Company to meet its corporate objectives. Specifically, Core Net Income was deemed important byEvery year, the Compensation Committee and given more weight given its importance to operatingCompany undertakes a rigorous financial planning process geared around establishing targets for performance and long-term shareholder value. In addition, Loan Growth and Transaction Deposit Growth are
30
both important metrics in executingthat will enhance the Company’s growth strategy.franchise value and return for shareholders. The Compensation Committee also believesreviews the metrics that the Non-Performing Assets Ratio and specific Enterprise Risk Management criteria are both important given the emphasis on asset quality and prudent risk management. Finally, as a Bank Executive, the Compensation Committee believes it is important to align Mr. Sobers’ compensationmost aligned with the financial performancestrategic objectives of the group that he oversees. Company and which are most aligned with the interest of shareholders.
| |
2024 Annual Proxy Statement | 41 |
In setting the target level of performance for each of the financial metrics, the committeeCompensation Committee considered the Company’s annual profit plan that is developed through the aforementioned planning process, strategic objectives for the Company and historical peer performance with respect to each metric.
For purposes of 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, the Compensation Committee set $6.0 million of GAAP net income as the minimum net income performance goal under the 2014 Omnibus Planwell as projected economic conditions for the 2017upcoming year. Our annual profit plan for 2023 factored in key assumptions regarding credit performance period (the “162(m) Compliance Gate”)metrics of our loan portfolio relative to peers. The Company, in keeping with respect to compensation for the Chief Executive Officer. See also “Tax Considerations” below.its normal process, did not factor in any impacts from any potential merger and acquisition activity or economic activity beyond its control such as interest rate changes that might occur during 2023 or any other global macroeconomic impacts.
Review of 20172023 STIP Performance Metrics Results by the Compensation Committee
As part of its role in overseeing and approving NEO compensation, the Compensation Committee reviewed and evaluated the actual achievement levels with respect to each performance metric under the 20172023 STIP.
In addition to the Compensation Committee determining that the 162(m) Compliance Gate was met, the following is a summary of the specific performance metrics established by the Compensation Committee for 2017, including the actual results for each metric with respect to Messrs. Laney, Lilly, Besskó and Newfield:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance metric | Weighting |
| Threshold |
| Target |
| Maximum |
| Actual |
| % achieved |
Core Net Income ($ in thousands)(1) | 20% |
| $25,116 |
| $29,549 |
| $32,504 |
| $30,784 |
| 24% |
Loan Growth(2) | 15% |
| 10.0% |
| 20.0% |
| 25.0% |
| 11.1% |
| 8% |
Transaction Deposit Growth(3) | 15% |
| 5.0% |
| 7.0% |
| 9.0% |
| 8.7% |
| 21% |
Asset Quality (Non-Performing Assets Ratio)(4) | 20% |
| 1.50% |
| 1.40% |
| 1.30% |
| 0.99% |
| 30% |
Enterprise Risk Management(5) | 15% |
| 80% |
| 100% |
| 120% |
| 120% |
| 23% |
Qualitative - Individual(6) | 15% |
| 80% |
| 100% |
| 120% |
| * |
| 8%-23% |
Payout as a Percentage of Target |
|
| 50% |
| 100% |
| 150% |
| TOTAL: |
| 114%-129% |
With respect to Mr. Sobers, 50% of his cash incentive bonus was dependent upon the achievement of the above-listed factors with the remaining 50% of his cash incentive bonus based upon the divisional performance of the Business and Consumer Banking Group. The following is a summary of the specific performance metrics established by the Compensation Committee for 2017,2023 (as further described above), including the actual results for each metric with respect to Messrs. Laney, Birkans, Newfield and Ms. Petrucci:
Performance Metrics |
| Weighting |
| Threshold |
| Target |
| Maximum |
| Actual |
| Weighting | ||||
Core Net Income ($ in thousands)(1) | | 40% | | $ | 127,386 | | $ | 149,866 | | $ | 157,359 | | $ | 142,567 | | 33.5% |
Asset Quality (Non-Performing Assets Ratio)(2) | | 30% | | | 0.80% | | | 0.65% | | | 0.50% | | | 0.42% | | 45% |
ERM & ESG(3) | | 15% | | | 80% | | | 100% | | | 120% | | | 150% | | 22.5% |
Payout Range for Each Metric | | | | | 50% | | | 100% | | | 150% | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Qualitative – Individual(5) | | 15% | | | 80% | | | 100% | | | 120% | | | 200% | | 30% |
Payout Range for Metric | | | | | 50% | | | 100% | | | 150% or 200%* | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | TOTAL PAYOUT: | | 131.0%* |
*Each HoldCo Executive may receive a payout of 200% for exceptional individual performance.
With respect to Mr. Randall, 30% of his 2023 STIP bonus was dependent upon the achievement of the above-listed factors with the remaining 70% of his 2023 STIP bonus based upon the performance of specific profitability and loan and deposit growth goals for the lines of business he oversees. The following is a summary of the specific performance metrics established by the Compensation Committee for 2023, including the actual results for each metric with respect to Mr. Sobers:Randall:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |||||
Performance Metrics |
| Weighting |
| Threshold |
| Target |
| Maximum |
| Actual |
| Weighting | ||||
Core Net Income ($ in thousands)(1) | | 5.0% | | $ | 127,386 | | $ | 149,866 | | $ | 157,359 | | $ | 142,567 | | 4.2% |
Asset Quality (Non-Performing Assets Ratio) (2) | | 5.0% | | | 0.80% | | | 0.65% | | | 0.50% | | | 0.42% | | 7.5% |
ERM & ESG (Qualitative) (3) | | 5.0% | | | 80% | | | 100% | | | 120% | | | 120% | | 7.5% |
Line of Business Specific Metrics(4)* | | 70% | | | 60% | | | 100% | | | 120% | | | varies | | 38.8% |
Qualitative – Individual(5)* | | 15% | | | 80% | | | 100% | | | 120% | | | 200% | | 30% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
STIP Payout as a Percentage of Target | | | | | 50% | | | 100% | | | 150%* | | | TOTAL: | | 88.0% |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance metric | Weighting |
| Threshold |
| Target |
| Maximum |
| Actual |
|
| % achieved |
Core Net Income ($ in thousands)(1) | 10% |
| $25,116 |
| $29,549 |
| $32,504 |
| $30,784 |
|
| 12% |
Loan Growth(2) | 7.5% |
| 10.0% |
| 20.0% |
| 25.0% |
| 11.1% |
|
| 4% |
Transaction Deposit Growth(3) | 7.5% |
| 5.0% |
| 7.0% |
| 9.0% |
| 8.7% |
|
| 11% |
Asset Quality (Non-Performing Assets Ratio)(4) | 10% |
| 1.50% |
| 1.40% |
| 1.30% |
| 0.99% |
|
| 15% |
Enterprise Risk Management(5) | 7.5% |
| 80% |
| 100% |
| 120% |
| 120% |
|
| 11% |
Division Contribution | 50% |
| 75% |
| 100% |
| 115% |
| 101.6% |
|
| 53% |
Qualitative - Individual(6) | 7.5% |
| 80% |
| 100% |
| 120% |
| 120% |
|
| 11% |
Payout as a Percentage of Target |
|
| 50% |
| 100% |
| 150% |
| TOTAL: |
|
| 117% |
*Mr. Randall may receive a payout of up to 200% for exceptional line of business results or individual performance, as determined by the Compensation Committee for these specific metrics.
Metric Definitions:
| (1) |
| Core Net Income is defined as net income under GAAP, |
31
|
| (2) |
|
|
|
|
| Non-Performing Assets Ratio is the ratio of |
| |
42 | National Bank Holdings Corporation |
| (3) |
|
|
| (4) |
|
| (5) | Qualitative - Individual factors include execution of strategic goals and objectives, building and fostering a values-based culture/organization, adherence to Company’s core values, and individual contributions to the Company’s performance.* |
* The individual performance results for each Named Executive are discussed below.
Enterprise Risk ManagementERM and ESG. With respect to this qualitative factor,metric, the Compensation Committee considered the Company’s regulatory examination results as well as its strong regulatory relationships. In addition, the committee considered the performance and stability of the BSA/AML and compliance programs as well as the Company’s internal controls and internal audit programs. several factors, including:
| ● | Strong asset quality and solid capital growth, increasing our tangible book value by 10.4% |
| ● | Positive regulatory standing and continued strong regulatory relationships |
| ● | Risk Management remained strong |
| ● | Diversified NBH’s liquidity position through the acquisition of Cambr |
| ● | Held first Do More Concert for charity and increased charitable giving |
| ● | Increased participation rate in 401K by 14% |
| ● | 16% improvement in environmental efficiencies |
| ● | 150 senior leaders in our organization, including our directors, completed Inclusive Leadership Training |
These considerations resulted in the achievement of this performance component at a 120% achievement level, or 150% of the target level or maximum. payout.
Qualitative Individual. For this component, the Compensation Committee considered each NEO’s individual performance as follows:
| ● |
| G. Timothy Laney |
1Represents a non-GAAP measure. Please refer to Appendix A for a reconciliation of these measures.
| ● |
|
|
| |
2024 Annual Proxy Statement | 43 |
| ● |
|
|
| ● | Angela N. Petrucci (exceptional performance): With respect to Ms. Petrucci, the Compensation Committee considered Ms. Petrucci’s development in the Chief Administrative Officer role, as well as Mr. Laney’s recommendation and evaluation of Ms. Petrucci’s performance. In consideration of this performance, Ms. Petrucci played a significant role in the Cambr acquisition and formation of the 2UniFi legal structure. She also contributed to the quality of regulatory relationships and played a key role in talent acquisition and oversight of the company’s benefits programs. The consideration of these factors resulted in the achievement of exceptional individual performance at a 200% payout. |
| ● | Christopher S. Randall (exceptional performance): With respect to Mr. Randall, the Compensation Committee considered Mr. |
|
|
32
|
|
Final STIP Payouts Under the 2017 STIPfor 2023
| | |||||
Named executive officer |
| Total Calculated Payout under |
| Total STIP |
| |
G. Timothy Laney | | 131% | | $ | 1,114,350 | |
Aldis Birkans | | 131% | | $ | 461,652 | |
Richard U. Newfield, Jr. | | 131% | | $ | 345,730 | |
Angela Petrucci | | 131% | | $ | 256,675 | |
Christopher S. Randall | | 88% | | $ | 155,250 | |
Based on the Compensation Committee’s analysis of the achievement of the quantitative financial metrics and the qualitative assessments, the committee awarded the following cash incentive bonus payments with respect to each of the NEOs:
Named executive officer | Total cash | Cash incentive bonus payment |
G. Timothy Laney | $868,000 | 129% |
Brian F. Lilly | $361,750 | 129% |
Zsolt K. Besskó | $243,000 | 129% |
Richard U. Newfield, Jr. | $221,500 | 114% |
Patrick G. Sobers | $137,250 | 117% |
2018 Executive Short-Term Cash Incentive Program
The 2018 Executive Short-Term Cash Incentive Program established by the Compensation Committee is substantially similar to the 2017 STIP.
Equity Compensation
Historical2023 Long-Term Equity Awards Overviewand Equity Mix
The Company was formed in 2009 with no operations or formal structure in place. As part of its building process, the Board of Directors sought to ensure that the right management team was established and that management was properly incentivized to achieve the Company’s growth goals. As a result, in the early years of the Company’s existence and in connection with the recruitment and hiring of our management team, certain of our NEOs principally received significant performance-based restricted stock awards that vest based on the attainment of certain stock prices (the remaining unvested portion of these awards vested in 2017) and options (which we consider to be performance-based) to further incentivize these individuals and align the executives’ interests with the interests of our shareholders. See the tables “Outstanding Equity Awards at 2017 Fiscal Year-End” and “Option Exercises and Stock Vested” below for further information regarding these awards.
From 2013 through 2015, the Compensation Committee established a consistent, annual equity award program in the form of time-based restricted stock and options, with a primary focus on retention.
Starting with 2016, the Compensation Committee determined that the Company was in a position to introduce longer term performance-based awards into its mix of annual equity awards to continue to align the interests of executives with the interest of shareholders, but still ensure retention.
2017 Long-Term Equity Awards
The equity awards granted in 20172023 took the following forms:
| 1. |
| Three-Year Performance Stock Unit Awards (PSUs) |
| 2. |
| Option Awards (which we consider to be |
| 3. |
| Time-Based Restricted Stock Awards |
| 4. | Profits Interest of 2UniFi, LLC for HoldCo executives |
33
| |
44 | National Bank Holdings Corporation |
The target equity mix for the CEO and the other NEOs is 70% performance-based for the standard annual equity awards granted in 2023.
These specific types of awards are further explained below.
The Compensation Committee approved the following equity award amounts for the equity granted to the NEOs in 2017:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Named executive officer | Total | Equity | Approximate | Approximate | Approximate |
G. Timothy Laney | 140% | $1,050,000 | 50% | 30% | 20% |
Brian F. Lilly | 120% | $450,000 | 50% | 30% | 20% |
Zsolt K. Besskó | 84% | $264,600 | 50% | 30% | 20% |
Richard U. Newfield, Jr. | 80% | $260,000 | 50% | 30% | 20% |
Patrick G. Sobers* | 34% | $82,500 | 50% | 30% | 20% |
*Mr. Sobers’ equity percentage is expressed as a percentage of his salary that was in effect as of February 22, 2017, which was $245,000.2023:
Named executive officer |
| Total | | | Equity |
| Approximate |
| Approximate |
| Approximate |
G. Timothy Laney | | 170% | | $ | 1,405,769 |
| 50% |
| 30% | | 20% |
Aldis Birkans | | 120% | | $ | 460,250 | | 50% | | 30% | | 20% |
Richard U. Newfield, Jr. | | 85% | | $ | 326,000 | | 50% | | 30% | | 20% |
Angela Petrucci | | 70% | | $ | 217,250 | | 50% | | 30% | | 20% |
Christopher S. Randall | | 78% | | $ | 227,000 | | 50% | | 30% | | 20% |
| (1) | The equity percentages are based on the annualized salary for each of the executives for 2022 as follows: $826,923 for Mr. Laney, $383,461 for Mr. Birkans, $383,462 for Mr. Newfield, $310,385 for Ms. Petrucci and $290,000 for Mr. Randall. |
| (2) | Reflects the equity award amounts attributable to the annual equity grants for each NEO. Does not include the 2UniFi, LLC profits interests awards. |
With these awards granted in 2017, in addition to the other outstanding awards described in the table “Outstanding Equity Awards at 2017 Fiscal Year-End,” a significant portion of equity awards remain outstanding in the form of performance-based awards (including stock options). In particular, 96% of the CEO’s outstanding equity awards at the end of 2017 were performance-based.
Three-Year Performance Stock Unit Award
In 2017,2023, the Compensation Committee continued withgranted a long-term performance stock unit award (“PSU Award”) with vesting that isvests based on the Company’s achievement of two metrics (one financial and one market-based) over a three-year performance period (January(covering January 1, 20172023 through December 31, 2019)2025). The Compensation Committee determined it was appropriate to continue with a single Company-based financial performance metric (3-year adjusted earnings per share) and a single relative market-based metric (3-year relative total shareholder return) which was consistent with the prior year. The Compensation Committee currently believes this structure is important to properly incentivize performance by executives within the Company and closely align with the long-term creation of shareholder value.
| |
2024 Annual Proxy Statement | 45 |
The PSU Award will vest on March 1, 20202026 and the number of shares delivered will be based upon the Compensation Committee’s certification of the attainment of the results at the end of the three-year performance period. The number of shares delivered under the award will be based upon an interpolation of threshold, target and maximum performance levels. The equity payouts at threshold, target, and maximum levels are 50%, 100% and 150%, respectively. In addition, dividends accrue during the three-year performance period and are paid on anyin proportion to the number of earned performance stock units on the vesting date. The two financial metrics and respective weightings for the PSU Award are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Performance Metric |
| Award |
| Threshold |
| Target |
| Maximum | |||
Cumulative Adjusted Earnings Per Share (EPS) (1) | | 60% | | | $10.10 | | | $11.89 | | | $12.48 |
3-year Relative Total Shareholder Return (TSR) (percentile rank) (2) | | 40% | | | 35th | | | 50th | | | 75th |
Equity Payout Amount | | 100% | | | 50% | | | 100% | | | 150% |
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Metric | Weighting | Threshold | Target | Maximum |
Cumulative Earnings Per Share (EPS) | 60% | $3.22 | $4.03 | $4.57 |
3-year Relative Total Shareholder Return (TSR)(1) (percentile rank) | 40% | 35th | 50th | 75th |
Equity Payout Amount | 100% | 50% | 100% | 150% |
| (1) |
|
| (2) | TSR is measured against the TSR for companies in the KBW Nasdaq Regional Banking Index |
The Company believes the PSU Award is important because it aligns a significant portion of the executive’s compensation against performance over an extended period and aligns the performance goals with the long-term corporate objectives of the Company. The Company believes linking compensation to long-term Company performance encourages prudent risk management and discourages excessive risk taking for short-term gain. Moreover, the Compensation Committee allocated 60% of the value of the award on Cumulative Adjusted EPS given the importance of earnings growth for the Company with the remaining 40% allocated to relative TSR to ensure the NEOs interests are closely aligned with the interests of shareholders.
34
Restricted Stock and Option Awards
The Compensation Committee also awarded equity to each of our NEOs in the form of restricted stock and options that each vest in one-third increments over three years. The Compensation Committee believes equity in this form is still an important element to ensure retention of its key executives and, with respect to stock options, also to incentivize long-term performance.
2017Profits Interest Unit Awards 2UniFi, LLC
In connection with the continued development of our digital solution 2UniFi, a national platform for providing banking services to small-and-medium-sized businesses, the Company established a wholly-owned subsidiary named 2UniFi, LLC in December 2023. Due to the strategic importance of 2UniFi and the successful growth strategy, the Compensation Committee determined that it was important that the interests of our executives with the most ability to impact our execution of that strategy be tied directly to the growth of 2UniFi. To directly link our executives’ interests with the growth of 2UniFi, our Compensation Committee adopted the 2UniFi, LLC 2023 Equity Award MixUnit Incentive Plan in December 2023 and granted profits interest awards in the form of Class B Units of 2UniFi, LLC pursuant to this plan to Messrs. Laney, Birkans, Newfield and Ms. Petrucci on December 11, 2023.
| |
46 | National Bank Holdings Corporation |
The Class B Units of 2UniFi, LLC are intended to qualify as profits interests for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The profits interests are equity interests in 2UniFi, LLC, but only have value to the extent the equity value of 2UniFi, LLC increases after the grant date. The Compensation Committee also linked the 2UniFi, LLC, profits interest awards to our retention goals by providing that the awards vest 50% on the third anniversary of the grant date and 25% on each of the fourth and fifth anniversary of the grant date, respectively, subject to continued service. The aggregate grant date fair value of the profits interests awards across our NEO group was less than $50,000.
Vesting of 2021 Performance Stock Unit Award
The equity mixperformance stock units that were previously granted in 2021 were subject to performance vesting conditions tied to the Company’s return on tangible assets and total shareholder return relative to a defined group of peer banks within the KRX Index, in each case over the period from January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2023.
The Compensation Committee determined to maintain its past use of a relative total shareholder return metric (TSR) and a relative return on tangible assets metric (ROTA). The Compensation Committee believed that the two return metrics appropriately balance operating performance with returns to shareholders, and that the use of relative measurement for both metrics would ensure alignment between management and shareholders. Both metrics also include a governor that caps the CEOpotential payout at 100% of target, if our TSR or ROTA are negative during the performance period. The Compensation Committee believes these governors provide important balance such that if our absolute operational performance and/or shareholder returns are not up to standards, the NEOs will not receive an above-target award.
The actual achievement under the relative TSR metric was 42nd percentile performance (number 22 out of 37 companies). With respect to the ROTA metric, the Company achieved an average rank at the 60th percentile with our percentile rank calculated separately for each year.
In 2024, the Compensation Committee reviewed the Company’s actual performance against the ROTA and relative TSR targets (as further described below) and confirmed that the awards achieved a payout of 101% of target. A summary of the Company’s performance as measured against the targets, and the other NEOsresulting payout, is 70% performance-based for the equity awards granted in 2017.set forth below:
| | | | Performance Goals | | Results | ||||||||||
Performance Metric |
| Award |
| Threshold |
| Target |
| Max |
| Actual |
| Percent of | ||||
3-year Relative Return on Tangible Assets (ROTA) (1) | | 60% | | | 35th | | | 50th | | | 75th | | | 60th | | 120% |
3-year Relative TSR (percentile rank) (2) | | 40% | | | 35th | | | 50th | | | 75th | | | 42nd | | 73% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total: | | 101% |
| (1) | ROTA is measured as the average of the percentile ranking of the Company’s ROTA among the ROTAs for companies included in the KRX Index for each respective calendar year of the performance period. If the Company has a negative ROTA in any one of the three years in the performance period, ROTA-based shares will not settle for more than target. Under the terms of the award, the Compensation Committee has the discretion to remove banks that have not implemented the Current Expected Credit Losses accounting standard (CECL) from the KRX Index as well as to adjust the calculation to account for one-time expenses related to mergers and acquisitions as reported in the public filings with the SEC. The payout percentage reflects such adjustments in the calculation. |
| (2) | TSR is measured against the TSR for companies in the KRX Index as of January 1, 2021 and assumes dividends are reinvested in additional shares on the ex-dividend date. If the Company has a negative absolute TSR for the three-year cumulative performance period, TSR-based shares will not settle for more than target. |
| |
2024 Annual Proxy Statement | 47 |
Stock Ownership Guidelines
We believe that ownership of our stock helps align the interests of certain of our key executives with those of shareholders and emphasizes the long-term aspects of equity-based compensation. The Board adopted minimum stock ownership thresholds (the “Executive Minimum Ownership Thresholds”) as part of the stock ownership guidelines applicable to our HoldCo Executives (the “Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines”) as shown in the table below.
As part ofUnder the Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines, only vested restricted shares and shares owned outright, count towards the Executive Minimum Ownership Thresholds. Unvested restricted shares and unexercised stock options do not count. In addition, HoldCo Executives who have not yet achieved the Executive Minimum Ownership Thresholds are required to retain 50% of the after-tax portion of vested stock awards and exercised options until the threshold is met.
As of December 31, 2017, each HoldCo ExecutiveMarch 11, 2024, Messrs. Laney and Newfield had achieved histheir respective Executive Minimum Ownership Threshold,Threshold. Mr. Birkans and Ms. Petrucci became subject to the guidelines in connection with their appointment as the exception of Mr. Besskó, who only joined the CompanyChief Financial Officer in mid-2013. It is likely that Mr. Besskó will achieve theAugust 2018, and Chief Administrative Officer and General Counsel in July 2020, respectively, and have not yet met their Executive Minimum Ownership Threshold within the next year.Thresholds.
| | |
Title: | Guidelines require owning: | |
| |
|
| ||
Chief Executive Officer |
| 5 times base salary |
| | |
Chief Financial |
| 4 times base salary |
| | |
Chief Risk Management Officer |
| 2 times base salary |
| | |
Chief Administrative Officer | 2 times base salary |
35
Insider Trading Restrictions and Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging
We have adopted an Insider Trading Policy. To further strengthen the alignment between stock ownership and your interests as shareholders, our Insider Trading Policy prohibits all associates, including our directorsevery director, officer, associate (including persons employed on a temporary or contract basis or through a staffing agency), and executive officers,consultant of the Company and its subsidiaries from engaging in short selling orsales, including sales with delayed delivery and any hedging transactions involving NBHC stock.with respect to the Company’s securities. Such hedging transactions include, but are not limited to, the use of prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars and exchange funds that are intended to offset any decrease in the value of the Company’s securities. In addition, pledging or hypothecation of Company’s securities by designated persons (including the NEOs) under the Company’s Insider Trading Policy is strongly discouraged.prohibited.
Clawback Policy
Each HoldCo Executive’s employment agreement contains a clawback provision, which requires, if the Company is required to prepare an accounting restatement due to material noncompliance of the Company with any financial reporting requirement as a result of misconduct, the executive to reimburse the Company for all amounts received under any incentive compensation plans and any gains realized on the sale of the Company’s securities, in each case during the 12 month period following the first public issuance or filing with the SEC (whichever first occurs) of the financial document embodying such financial reporting requirement. The clawback provision also provides that if the executive is found guilty of misconduct by any judicial or administrative authority in connection with any (A)(1) formal investigation by the SEC or (B)(2) other federal or state regulatory investigation, the Compensation Committee may require the repayment of any gain realized on the exercise of an award under any equity compensation plan without regard to the timing of the determination of misconduct in relation to the timing of the exercise of the award.
In addition, each NEO’s equity award agreements include a similar clawback provision, including a clause whereby if the executive has engaged in a serious breach of conduct, the Compensation Committee may
| |
48 | National Bank Holdings Corporation |
require the executive to forfeit the unvested award and/or require the executive to repay any amounts realized upon the vesting of the award or on the subsequent sale of the shares underlying the award.
In addition to the Company’s rights under the individual contractual clawback provisions, the Compensation Committee adopted a new Compensation Recovery Policy in November 2023 designed to implement the mandatory incentive-based compensation recovery in compliance with applicable SEC and NYSE rules. The new recovery policy applies to the company’s executive officers and requires recovery of incentive-based compensation erroneously received by executive officers after an accounting restatement as required under those rules.
Compensation Risk
Our Compensation Committee is responsible for the oversight of our compensation of associates and for the risk management as it relates to compensation. We are also subject to regulatory oversight and reviews, whereby our compensation practices are subject to the review of our regulators and any restrictions or requirements that may be imposed upon us. We conducted an analysis and risk assessment of our incentive compensation programs in 2017.for 2023. After reviewing our executive and broad-based incentive compensation programs, the Compensation Committee determined that our overall compensation policies and practices do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our Company. Company and do not promote unnecessary risk-taking on the part of our executives and other plan participants.
Compensation Disclosure Controls
The Compensation Committee also assessed the compensation disclosure controls that management had puthas in place to ensure proper disclosure of compensation data. The Compensation Committee approved those controls after review and discussion with management.
UseofCorporateAircraft
Tax Considerations
PriorFor reasons of business efficiency and continued security-related concerns (including personal and cyber security as well as privacy of business information and communications), the Company owns and operates a corporate aircraft. The use of the corporate aircraft is primarily for business purposes and is governed by the Board approved Airplane Use Policy. In addition to business travel, this policy provides our HoldCo Executives with limited personal use of the Corporate-owned aircraft, without reimbursement to the Tax Reform Legislation, Section 162(m)Company, as follows: CEO up to a maximum of 30 flight hours per year; CFO up to a maximum of 20 flight hours per year; CRMO up to a maximum of 10 flight hours per year; and the CAO up to a maximum of 8 flight hours per year. In the event that either the CEO, CFO, CRMO or CAO exceeds their respective hours in a specific year, they shall each be required to reimburse the Company for the full incremental costs of such use under a time sharing agreement that each of the above individuals has entered into with the Company. In 2023, the value of the personal use of the Corporate-owned aircraft for our CEO, CFO and CRMO is $91,828, $23,790 and $5,821, respectively. Our CAO did not utilize the Corporate-owned aircraft for personal purposes in 2023.
Tax Considerations
The Internal Revenue Code placedof 1986, as amended, generally limits a public company’s corporate income tax deduction for compensation to $1 million limit on the amount of compensation the Company may deductper year for tax purposes in any year with respect to each NEO (other than the Principal Financial Officer), except that performance-based compensation meeting the applicable requirements was excluded from the $1 million limit. As part of the Tax Reform Legislation, the ability to rely on the performance-based compensation exception was eliminated and the limitation on deductibility generally was expanded to include all individuals who are considered covered employees, including our NEOs. As a result of the Tax Reform Legislation, the Company will no longer be able to deduct any compensation paid to is NEOs in excess of $1 million unless it qualifies for transition relief applicable to certain arrangements in places as of November 2, 2017. The Compensation Committee implements compensation programs that it believes are competitive, will be assessingattract and retain executive talent and are in the impactbest interests of the Tax Reform Legislation,Company and its shareholders. Accordingly, the amendments to Section 162(m) included in that legislation, to determine what adjustments to our executive compensation practices, if any, it considers appropriate. Theawarded under the programs approved by the Compensation Committee has the discretion tomay provide compensation which may not be deductible by reason of Section 162(m).for non-deductible payments or benefits.
36
| |
2024 Annual Proxy Statement | 49 |
The following tables, accompanying footnotes and narrative provide information about compensation paid to the Company’s NEOs as described in the CD&A.
The following summary compensation table sets forth the total compensation paid or accrued for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162023, 2022 and 2015,2021 (as applicable) for each of our NEOs.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Nonqualified | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Non-equity | | deferred | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Stock | | Option | | incentive plan | | compensation | | All other | | |
Name and principal | | | | Salary | | Bonus | | awards | | awards | | compensation | | earnings | | compensation | | Total |
position |
| Year |
| ($) |
| ($) |
| ($)(1) |
| ($)(2) |
| ($)(3) |
| ($)(4) |
| ($) |
| ($) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
G. Timothy Laney |
| 2023 |
| 850,000 |
| — |
| 1,160,363 |
| 281,148 |
| 1,114,350 |
| — |
| 172,240 | (5) | 3,578,101 |
Chairman, President and |
| 2022 |
| 826,923 |
| — |
| 839,909 |
| 209,995 |
| 1,302,404 |
| — |
| 111,158 | | 3,290,389 |
Chief Executive Officer |
| 2021 |
| 750,000 |
| — |
| 976,678 |
| 209,994 |
| 1,012,500 |
| — |
| 60,375 | | 3,009,547 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Aldis Birkans | | 2023 | | 469,846 | | — | | 373,643 | | 92,046 | | 461,652 | | 2,688 | | 61,764 | (6) | 1,461,640 |
EVP, Chief Financial Officer | | 2022 | | 383,461 | | — | | 359,961 | | 89,990 | | 452,964 | | 1,629 | | 55,700 | | 1,343,705 |
| | 2021 | | 365,769 | | — | | 283,953 | | 59,492 | | 421,875 | | 1,544 | | 27,900 | | 1,160,533 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Richard U. Newfield, Jr. |
| 2023 |
| 406,000 |
| — |
| 262,653 |
| 65,196 |
| 345,730 |
| 6,033 |
| 42,252 | (7) | 1,127,864 |
EVP, Chief Risk |
| 2022 |
| 383,462 |
| — |
| 294,294 |
| 73,598 |
| 392,568 |
| 5,015 |
| 39,621 | | 1,188,558 |
Management Officer |
| 2021 |
| 375,000 |
| — |
| 304,215 |
| 63,748 |
| 365,625 |
| 5,015 |
| 30,917 | | 1,144,520 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Angela N. Petrucci |
| 2023 |
| 326,538 |
| — |
| 175,650 |
| 43,446 |
| 256,675 |
| 50 |
| 18,866 | (8) | 821,225 |
EVP, Chief Administrative | | 2022 |
| 310,385 |
| — |
| 165,156 |
| 41,300 |
| 293,313 |
| 20 |
| 26,494 | | 836,668 |
Officer & General Counsel | | 2021 |
| 274,231 |
| |
| 141,442 |
| 29,992 |
| 258,750 |
| 13 |
| 20,857 | | 725,284 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Christopher S. Randall |
| 2023 |
| 320,769 |
| — |
| 181,562 |
| 45,392 |
| 155,250 |
| — |
| 7,565 | (9) | 710,538 |
EVP, Commercial, Specialty |
| 2022 |
| 290,000 |
| — |
| 150,781 |
| 37,697 |
| 193,779 |
| — |
| 6,909 | | 679,166 |
and Business Banking |
| 2021 | | 286,538 | | — | | 142,953 |
| 35,744 | | 183,000 | | — | | 6,114 | | 654,349 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Nonqualified |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Non-equity |
| deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Stock |
| Option |
| incentive plan |
| compensation |
| All other |
|
|
Name and principal |
|
|
| Salary |
| Bonus |
| awards |
| awards |
| compensation |
| earnings |
| compensation |
| Total |
position |
| Year |
| ($) |
| ($) |
| ($)(1) |
| ($)(2) |
| ($)(3) |
| ($)(4) |
| ($) |
| ($) |
G. Timothy Laney |
| 2017 |
| 750,000 |
| — |
| 839,937 |
| 209,995 |
| 868,000 |
| — |
| 48,780 | (5) | 2,716,712 |
Chairman, President and |
| 2016 |
| 750,000 |
| — |
| 839,974 |
| 210,000 |
| 482,000 |
| — |
| 41,820 |
| 2,323,794 |
Chief Executive Officer |
| 2015 |
| 750,000 |
| — |
| 610,484 |
| 139,503 |
| 834,000 |
| — |
| 66,180 |
| 2,400,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brian F. Lilly |
| 2017 |
| 375,000 |
| — |
| 359,930 |
| 89,993 |
| 361,750 |
| 750 |
| 10,762 | (6) | 1,198,185 |
Chief Financial Officer; |
| 2016 |
| 375,000 |
| — |
| 559,946 |
| 90,000 |
| 222,000 |
| — |
| 15,450 |
| 1,262,396 |
Chief of M&A and Strategy |
| 2015 |
| 375,000 |
| — |
| 259,450 |
| 59,287 |
| 347,000 |
| 905 |
| 32,475 |
| 1,074,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zsolt K. Besskó |
| 2017 |
| 315,000 |
| — |
| 211,593 |
| 52,918 |
| 243,000 |
| — |
| 22,800 | (7) | 845,311 |
Chief Administrative |
| 2016 |
| 315,000 |
| — |
| 251,578 |
| 50,399 |
| 149,000 |
| — |
| 24,024 |
| 790,001 |
Officer & General Counsel |
| 2015 |
| 315,000 |
| — |
| 141,020 |
| 32,225 |
| 214,000 |
| — |
| 26,154 |
| 728,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard U. Newfield, Jr. |
| 2017 |
| 325,000 |
| — |
| 207,941 |
| 51,997 |
| 221,500 |
| 2,320 |
| 23,487 | (8) | 832,245 |
Chief Risk |
| 2016 |
| 325,000 |
| — |
| 270,948 |
| 55,248 |
| 124,500 |
| — |
| 26,232 |
| 801,928 |
Management Officer |
| 2015 |
| 325,000 |
| — |
| 158,727 |
| 36,271 |
| 241,000 |
| 1,961 |
| 27,777 |
| 790,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patrick Sobers |
| 2017 |
| 260,673 |
| — |
| 65,973 |
| 16,496 |
| 137,250 |
| — |
| 20,852 | (9) | 501,244 |
EVP, Head of Business and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Banking |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
| The amounts in this column reflect the grant date fair value of the restricted stock awarded to our NEOs, determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. See Note |
With respect to the performance stock units granted in 2021 and 2022 please refer to our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, Note 16, Stock-based Compensation and Benefits, Performance stock units section.
Pursuant to SEC rules, for the part of the performance stock units that are subject to performance conditions (the ROTA metric for the 2021 award and the cumulative EPS metric for the 2022 and 2023 awards), the value of such award assuming the highest level of performance condition is achieved under the 2021, 2022, and 2023 awards is $472,462, $472,444, and $632,595 respectively, for Mr. Laney, $133,853, $202,476, and $207,084 respectively, for Mr. Birkans, $143,431, $165,545, and $146,655 respectively, for Mr. Newfield, $67,469, $92,909, and $97,720 respectively, for Ms. Petrucci, and $80,420, $84,824, and $102,137 respectively, for Mr. Randall.
For that part of the performance stock units that is subject to market conditions (the TSR metric), the potential maximum value is factored into the calculated grant date fair value for the 2021, 2022, and 2023 awards, which is $314,975, $314,976, and $421,730 respectively, for Mr. Laney, $89,248, $134,990, and $138,047 respectively, for Mr. Birkans, $95,605, $110,350, and $97,781 respectively, for Mr. Newfield, $44,996, $61,917, and $65,147 respectively, for Ms. Petrucci, and $53,589, $56,523, and $68,069 respectively, for Mr. Randall.
Stock award amounts include the Class B Units of 2UniFi, LLC which had a grant date fair value of $35,750 for Mr. Laney, $5,500 for Mr. Birkans and $1,925 for Mr. Newfield and Ms. Petrucci, respectively.
The Company is an investor in Finstro Global Holdings, Inc., (Finstro), a provider of trade credit and payment solutions. In 2021, Finstro granted an award of performance-vesting restricted shares to each of Messrs. Laney, Birkans, Newfield and Ms. Petrucci with a grant date fair market value of $391,121, $65,162, $52,122 and $52,122 respectively. Such awards were previously disclosed in the Company’s annual proxy statement filed with the SEC for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021. The awards were granted solely in connection with these NEOs’ services to Finstro and the Compensation Committee does not consider such awards in making its compensation decisions with respect to these NEOs’ services to the Company. Because Finstro is not a subsidiary of the Company, these awards are not included in this column.
| (2) |
| The amounts in this column reflect the grant date fair value of stock option awards granted to our |
| |
50 | National Bank Holdings Corporation |
| See Note |
| (3) |
| Amounts in this column represent cash bonuses we paid under the |
| (4) |
| Any amounts reported in this column represent the above-market portion of interest earned in a fixed rate investment |
| (5) |
| Includes Company matching contributions to the 401(k) plan and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan of |
| (6) |
| Includes Company matching contributions to the 401(k) plan and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan of |
| (7) |
| Includes Company matching contributions to the 401(k) plan and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan of |
| (8) |
| Includes Company matching contributions to the |
| (9) |
| Includes Company matching contributions to the |
37
| |
2024 Annual Proxy Statement | 51 |
20172023 Grants of Plan-Based Awards
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to plan-based awards granted to each of our NEOs during 2017:2023:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | All | | All | | | | Grant | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | other | | other | | | | date | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | stock | | option | | | | fair | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | awards: | | awards: | | Exercise | | value | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Number of | | Number of | | or base | | of stock | |
| | | | | | Estimated potential payouts under | | Estimated future payouts under | | shares | | securities | | price of | | and | | ||||||||
| | | | Date of | | non-equity incentive plan awards(1) | | equity incentive plan awards(2) | | of stock | | underlying | | option | | option | | ||||||||
| | | | Committee | | Threshold | | Target | | Maximum | | Threshold | | Target | | Maximum | | or units |
| options | | awards |
| awards | |
Name |
| Grant date |
| Approval |
| ($) |
| ($) |
| ($) |
| (#) |
| (#) |
| (#) |
| (#) |
| (#) |
| ($/Sh) |
| ($)(3) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
G. Timothy Laney | | — | | — | | 425,000 | | 850,000 | | 1,338,750 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | |
|
| 04/01/2023 | | 02/28/2023 |
| — |
| — |
| — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 31,204 | (5) | 33.46 |
| 281,148 | |
|
| 04/01/2023 | | 02/28/2023 |
| — |
| — |
| — | | — | | — | | — | | 12,604 | (4) | — | | — |
| 421,730 | |
|
| 04/01/2023 | | 02/28/2023 |
| — |
| — |
| — | | 11,497 | | 22,994 | | 34,491 | | — |
| — |
| — |
| 702,883 | |
| | 12/11/2023 | | 12/11/2023 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 65,000 | (6) | — | | — | | 35,750 | (6) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Aldis Birkans |
| — | | — |
| 176,192 |
| 352,385 |
| 555,006 | | — |
| — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | |
|
| 04/01/2023 | | 02/28/2023 |
| — |
| — |
| — | | — |
| — | | — | | — | | 10,216 | (5) | 33.46 | | 92,046 | |
| | 04/01/2023 | | 02/28/2023 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 4,126 | (4) | — | | — | | 138,056 | |
| | 04/01/2023 | | 02/28/2023 | | — | | — | | — | | 3,764 |
| 7,527 | | 11,291 | | — | | — | | — | | 230,087 | |
| | 12/11/2023 | | 12/11/2023 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 10,000 | (6) | — | | — | | 5,500 | (6) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Richard U. Newfield, Jr. |
| — | | — |
| 131,950 |
| 263,900 |
| 415,642 | | — |
| — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | |
| | 04/01/2023 | | 02/28/2023 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 7,236 | (5) | 33.46 | | 65,196 | |
|
| 04/01/2023 | | 02/28/2023 |
| — |
| — |
| — | | — |
| — | | — | | 2,922 | (4) | — | | — | | 97,770 | |
|
| 04/01/2023 | | 02/28/2023 |
| — |
| — |
| — | | 2,666 | | 5,331 | | 7,997 | | — | | — | | — | | 162,958 | |
| | 12/11/2023 | | 12/11/2023 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 3,500 | (6) | — | | — | | 1,925 | (6) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Angela Petrucci |
| — | | — | | 97,962 |
| 195,923 |
| 308,579 | | — |
| — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | |
| | 04/01/2023 | | 02/28/2023 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 4,822 | (5) | 33.46 | | 43,446 | |
| | 04/01/2023 | | 02/28/2023 | | — |
| — |
| — | | — |
| — | | — | | 1,947 | (4) | — | | — | | 65,147 | |
|
| 04/01/2023 | | 02/28/2023 | | — |
| — |
| — | | 1,776 | | 3,552 | | 5,328 | | — | | — | | — | | 108,578 | |
| | 12/11/2023 | | 12/11/2023 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 3,500 | (6) | — | | — | | 1,925 | (6) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Christopher S. Randall |
| — | | — | | 88,212 |
| 176,423 |
| 339,614 | | — |
| — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | |
| | 04/01/2023 | | 02/28/2023 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 5,038 | (5) | 33.46 | | 45,392 | |
| | 04/01/2023 | | 02/28/2023 | | — |
| — |
| — | | — |
| — | | — | | 2,035 | (4) | — | | — | | 68,091 | |
|
| 04/01/2023 | | 02/28/2023 | | — |
| — |
| — | | 1,856 | | 3,712 | | 5,568 | | — | | — | | — | | 113,471 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All |
| All |
|
|
| Grant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| other |
| other |
|
|
| date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| stock |
| option |
|
|
| fair |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| awards: |
| awards: |
| Exercise |
| value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Number of |
| Number of |
| or base |
| of stock |
|
|
|
|
|
| Estimated potential payouts under |
| Estimated future payouts under |
| shares |
| securities |
| price of |
| and | ||||||||
|
|
|
| Date of |
| non-equity incentive plan awards(1) |
| equity incentive plan awards(2) |
| of stock |
| underlying |
| option |
| option | ||||||||
|
|
|
| Committee |
| Threshold |
| Target |
| Maximum |
| Threshold |
| Target |
| Maximum |
| or units |
| options |
| awards |
| awards |
Name |
| Grant date |
| Approval |
| ($) |
| ($) |
| ($) |
| (#) |
| (#) |
| (#) |
| (#) |
| (#)(3) |
| ($/Sh) |
| ($)(4) |
G. Timothy Laney |
| 02/22/2017 |
| 02/22/2017 |
| 337,500 |
| 675,000 |
| 1,012,500 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
| 03/01/2017 |
| 02/22/2017 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 9,253 | (5) | — |
| — |
| 314,972 |
|
| 03/01/2017 |
| 02/22/2017 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 7,902 |
| 15,803 |
| 23,705 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 524,965 |
|
| 03/01/2017 |
| 02/22/2017 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 26,683 |
| 34.04 |
| 209,995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brian F. Lilly |
| 02/22/2017 |
| 02/22/2017 |
| 140,625 |
| 281,250 |
| 421,875 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
| 03/01/2017 |
| 02/22/2017 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 3,965 | (5) | — |
| — |
| 134,969 |
|
| 03/01/2017 |
| 02/22/2017 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 3,386 |
| 6,772 |
| 10,158 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 224,961 |
|
| 03/01/2017 |
| 02/22/2017 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 11,435 |
| 34.04 |
| 89,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zsolt K. Besskó |
| 02/22/2017 |
| 02/22/2017 |
| 94,500 |
| 189,000 |
| 283,500 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
| 03/01/2017 |
| 02/22/2017 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 2,331 | (5) | — |
| — |
| 79,347 |
|
| 03/01/2017 |
| 02/22/2017 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 1,991 |
| 3,981 |
| 5,972 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 132,246 |
|
| 03/01/2017 |
| 02/22/2017 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 6,724 |
| 34.04 |
| 52,918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard U. Newfield, Jr. |
| 02/22/2017 |
| 02/22/2017 |
| 97,500 |
| 195,000 |
| 292,500 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
| 03/01/2017 |
| 02/22/2017 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 2,291 | (5) | — |
| — |
| 77,986 |
|
| 03/01/2017 |
| 02/22/2017 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 1,956 |
| 3,912 |
| 5,868 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 129,955 |
|
| 03/01/2017 |
| 02/22/2017 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 6,607 |
| 34.04 |
| 51,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patrick G. Sobers |
| 02/22/2017 |
| 02/22/2017 |
| 58,651 |
| 117,303 |
| 175,954 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
| 03/01/2017 |
| 02/22/2017 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 727 | (5) | — |
| — |
| 24,747 |
|
| 03/01/2017 |
| 02/22/2017 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 621 |
| 1,241 |
| 1,862 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 41,226 |
|
| 03/01/2017 |
| 02/22/2017 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 2,096 |
| 34.04 |
| 16,496 |
| (1) |
| Cash incentive bonuses under the |
| (2) |
| Represents the possible range of the performance stock units granted |
| (3) |
|
|
| The amounts in this column reflect the grant date fair value of the restricted stock, |
| (4) |
| Represents time-based shares of restricted stock that vest, subject to the NEO’s continued service through the applicable vesting date, in three equal annual installments, the first of which will occur on April 28, |
| (5) | Represents stock options that vest, subject to the NEO’s continued service through the applicable vesting date, in three equal annual installments, the first of which will occur on April 28, 2024. |
| (6) | Represents the number of Class B Units of 2UniFi, LLC that were granted on December 11, 2023 under the 2UniFi, LLC 2023 Equity Unit Incentive Plan. 50% of the awards vest upon the third anniversary of the date of grant and 25% of the awards vest upon each of the fourth and fifth anniversaries of the date of grant. The grant date fair value of the awards was $0.55 per unit. |
38
| |
52 | National Bank Holdings Corporation |
Outstanding Equity Awards at 20172023 Fiscal Year-End
The following table provides information regarding outstanding equity awards held by each of our NEOs on December 31, 2017:2023:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Equity | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| incentive | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Equity |
| plan | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| incentive |
| awards: | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| plan |
| Market or | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| awards: |
| payout | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Number of |
| value of | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Number |
| Market |
| unearned |
| unearned | ||||||||||||||||
|
| Number of |
| Number of |
|
|
|
|
| of shares |
| value of |
| shares, |
| shares, | ||||||||||||||||
|
| securities |
| securities |
|
|
|
|
| or units |
| shares or |
| units or |
| units or | ||||||||||||||||
|
| underlying |
| underlying |
|
|
|
|
| of stock |
| units of |
| other |
| other | ||||||||||||||||
|
| unexercised |
| unexercised |
| Option |
|
|
| that |
| stock that |
| rights that |
| rights that | ||||||||||||||||
|
| options |
| options |
| exercise |
| Option |
| have not |
| have not |
| have not |
| have not | ||||||||||||||||
|
| exercisable |
| unexercisable |
| price |
| expiration |
| vested |
| vested |
| vested |
| vested | ||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||
|
| Option Awards |
| Restricted Stock Awards |
| Performance-Based Awards | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Equity | ||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | incentive | ||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Equity | | plan | ||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | incentive | | awards: | ||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | plan | | Market or | ||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | awards: | | payout | ||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Number of | | value of | ||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | Number | | Market | | unearned | | unearned | ||||||||||||||||
| | Number of | | Number of | | | | | | of shares | | value of | | shares, | | shares, | ||||||||||||||||
| | securities | | securities | | | | | | or units | | shares or | | units or | | units or | ||||||||||||||||
| | underlying | | underlying | | | | | | of stock | | units of | | other | | other | ||||||||||||||||
| | unexercised | | unexercised | | Option | | | | that | | stock that | | rights that | | rights that | ||||||||||||||||
| | options | | options | | exercise | | Option | | have not | | have not | | have not | | have not | ||||||||||||||||
|
| exercisable |
| unexercisable |
| price |
| expiration |
| vested |
| vested |
| vested |
| vested | ||||||||||||||||
Name |
| (#) |
| (#) |
| ($) |
| date |
| (#) |
| ($)(1) |
| (#) |
| ($)(1) | | (#) | | (#) | | ($) | | date | | (#) | | ($)(1) | | (#) | | ($)(1) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||
G. Timothy Laney |
| 550,000 |
| — |
| 20.00 |
| 6/17/2020 |
| 10,666 | (2) | 345,898 |
| 43,223 | (3) | 1,401,722 | | 31,996 | | — | | 19.08 | | 4/28/2025 | | 3,750 | (2) | 139,463 |
| 21,278 | (3) | 791,329 |
|
| 28,000 |
| — |
| 18.92 |
| 4/29/2024 |
| 10,736 | (4) | 348,168 |
| 15,803 | (5) | 512,491 | ||||||||||||||||
|
| 21,330 |
| 10,666 | (2) | 19.08 |
| 4/28/2025 |
| 9,253 | (6) | 300,075 |
| — |
| — | ||||||||||||||||
|
| 16,587 |
| 33,176 | (4) | 19.56 |
| 3/1/2026 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — | ||||||||||||||||
|
| — |
| 26,683 | (6) | 34.04 |
| 3/1/2027 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Brian F. Lilly |
| 100,000 |
| — |
| 20.00 |
| 2/27/2022 |
| 2,715 | (7) | 88,047 |
| 18,522 | (3) | 600,668 | ||||||||||||||||
|
| 16,300 |
| — |
| 18.09 |
| 5/2/2023 |
| 4,534 | (2) | 147,038 |
| 6,772 | (5) | 219,616 | ||||||||||||||||
|
| 7,390 |
| — |
| 20.00 |
| 5/2/2023 |
| 4,601 | (4) | 149,210 |
| — |
| — | ||||||||||||||||
|
| 11,900 |
| — |
| 18.92 |
| 4/29/2024 |
| 3,965 | (6) | 128,585 |
| — |
| — | ||||||||||||||||
|
| 9,064 |
| 4,534 | (2) | 19.08 |
| 4/28/2025 |
| 17,730 | (8) | 574,984 |
| — |
| — | ||||||||||||||||
|
| 7,109 |
| 14,218 | (4) | 19.56 |
| 3/1/2026 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — | ||||||||||||||||
|
| — |
| 11,435 | (6) | 34.04 |
| 3/1/2027 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Zsolt K. Besskó |
| 9,450 |
| — |
| 20.54 |
| 8/8/2023 |
| 2,364 | (9) | 76,665 |
| 10,373 | (3) | 336,396 | ||||||||||||||||
|
| 4,480 |
| — |
| 18.92 |
| 4/29/2024 |
| 2,465 | (2) | 79,940 |
| 3,981 | (5) | 129,104 | ||||||||||||||||
|
| 4,926 |
| 2,465 | (2) | 19.08 |
| 4/28/2025 |
| 2,577 | (4) | 83,572 |
| — |
| — | ||||||||||||||||
|
| 3,981 |
| 7,962 | (4) | 19.56 |
| 3/1/2026 |
| 2,331 | (6) | 75,594 |
| — |
| — | ||||||||||||||||
|
| — |
| 6,724 | (6) | 34.04 |
| 3/1/2027 |
| 4,432 | (8) | 143,730 |
| — |
| — | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| | 49,763 | | — | | 19.56 | | 3/1/2026 | | 5,143 | (4) | 191,268 |
| 20,507 | (5) | 762,655 | ||||||||||||||||
| | 26,683 | | — | | 34.04 | | 3/1/2027 | | 12,604 | (6) | 468,743 |
| 22,994 | (7) | 855,147 | ||||||||||||||||
| | 37,042 | | — | | 32.65 | | 3/1/2028 | | 65,000 | (8) | — | | — | | — | ||||||||||||||||
| | 33,386 | | — | | 34.08 | | 4/1/2029 | | — | | — | | — | | — | ||||||||||||||||
| | 63,444 | | — | | 23.10 | | 4/1/2030 | | — | | — | | — | | — | ||||||||||||||||
| | 14,506 | | 7,255 | (2) | 40.16 | | 4/1/2031 | | — | | — | | — | | — | ||||||||||||||||
| | 6,469 | | 12,939 | (4) | 40.83 | | 4/1/2032 | | — | | — | | — | | — | ||||||||||||||||
| | — | | 31,204 | (6) | 33.46 | | 4/1/2033 | | — | | — | | — | | — | ||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Aldis Birkans | | 2,773 | | — | | 19.08 | | 4/28/2025 | | 1,125 | (2) | 41,839 | | 6,029 | (3) | 224,219 | ||||||||||||||||
| | 3,080 | | — | | 19.56 | | 3/1/2026 | | 2,204 | (4) | 81,967 | | 8,789 | (5) | 326,863 | ||||||||||||||||
| | 3,303 | | — | | 34.04 | | 3/1/2027 | | 4,126 | (6) | 153,446 | | 7,527 | (7) | 279,929 | ||||||||||||||||
| | 2,442 | | — | | 32.65 | | 3/1/2028 | | 10,000 | (8) | — | | — | | — | ||||||||||||||||
| | 1,987 | | — | | 35.36 | | 5/2/2028 | | — | | — | | — | | — | ||||||||||||||||
| | 7,631 | | — | | 34.08 | | 4/1/2029 | | — | | — | | — | | — | ||||||||||||||||
| | 17,552 | | — | | 23.10 | | 4/1/2030 | | — | | — | | — | | — | ||||||||||||||||
| | 4,110 | | 2,055 | (2) | 40.16 | | 4/1/2031 | | — | | — | | — | | — | ||||||||||||||||
| | 2,772 | | 5,545 | (4) | 40.83 | | 4/1/2032 | | — | | — | | — | | — | ||||||||||||||||
| | — | | 10,216 | (6) | 33.46 | | 4/1/2033 | | — | | — | | — | | — | ||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Richard U. Newfield, Jr. |
| 200,000 |
| — |
| 20.00 |
| 1/25/2021 |
| 1,630 | (7) | 52,861 |
| 11,370 | (3) | 368,729 | | 6,607 | | — | | 34.04 | | 3/1/2027 | | 1,205 | (2) | 44,814 |
| 6,460 | (3) | 240,247 |
|
| 50,000 |
| — |
| 20.00 |
| 10/11/2018 |
| 2,773 | (2) | 89,928 |
| 3,912 | (5) | 126,866 | ||||||||||||||||
|
| 9,780 |
| — |
| 18.09 |
| 5/2/2023 |
| 2,824 | (4) | 91,582 |
| — |
| — | ||||||||||||||||
|
| 7,200 |
| — |
| 18.92 |
| 4/29/2024 |
| 2,291 | (6) | 74,297 |
| — |
| — | ||||||||||||||||
|
| 5,546 |
| 2,773 | (2) | 19.08 |
| 4/28/2025 |
| 4,432 | (8) | 143,730 |
| — |
| — | ||||||||||||||||
|
| 4,364 |
| 8,728 | (4) | 19.56 |
| 3/1/2026 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — | ||||||||||||||||
|
| — |
| 6,607 | (6) | 34.04 |
| 3/1/2027 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Patrick G. Sobers |
| 3,260 |
| — |
| 18.09 |
| 5/2/2023 |
| 543 | (7) | 17,609 |
| 2,673 | (3) | 86,685 | ||||||||||||||||
|
| 2,400 |
| — |
| 18.92 |
| 4/29/2024 |
| 925 | (2) | 29,998 |
| 1,241 | (5) | 40,246 | ||||||||||||||||
|
| 1,848 |
| 925 | (2) | 19.08 |
| 4/28/2025 |
| 664 | (4) | 21,534 |
| — |
| — | ||||||||||||||||
|
| 1,026 |
| 2,054 | (4) | 19.56 |
| 3/1/2026 |
| 727 | (6) | 23,577 |
| — |
| — | ||||||||||||||||
|
| — |
| 2,096 | (6) | 34.04 |
| 3/1/2027 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — | ||||||||||||||||
| | 8,934 | | — | | 32.65 | | 3/1/2028 | | 1,802 | (4) | 67,016 |
| 7,186 | (5) | 267,247 | ||||||||||||||||
| | 8,783 | | — | | 34.08 | | 4/1/2029 | | 2,922 | (6) | 108,669 |
| 5,331 | (7) | 198,260 | ||||||||||||||||
| | 19,259 | | — | | 23.10 | | 4/1/2030 | | 3,500 | (8) | — | | — | | — | ||||||||||||||||
| | 4,404 | | 2,202 | (2) | 40.16 | | 4/1/2031 | | — | | — | | — | | — | ||||||||||||||||
| | 2,267 | | 4,535 | (4) | 40.83 | | 4/1/2032 | | — | | — | | — | | — | ||||||||||||||||
| | — | | 7,236 | (6) | 33.46 | | 4/1/2033 | | — | | — | | — | | — | ||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Angela Petrucci | | 541 | | — | | 20.33 | | 6/15/2025 | | 553 | (2) | 20,566 |
| 3,039 | (3) | 113,020 | ||||||||||||||||
| | 675 | | — | | 19.56 | | 3/1/2026 | | 1,012 | (4) | 37,636 |
| 4,033 | (5) | 149,987 | ||||||||||||||||
| | 889 | | — | | 34.04 | | 3/1/2027 | | 1,947 | (6) | 72,409 | | 3,552 | (7) | 132,099 | ||||||||||||||||
| | 1,356 | | — | | 32.65 | | 3/1/2028 | | 3,500 | (8) | — | | — | | — | ||||||||||||||||
| | 1,844 | | — | | 34.08 | | 4/1/2029 | | — | | — | | — | | — | ||||||||||||||||
| | 3,021 | | — | | 23.10 | | 4/1/2030 | | — | | — | | — | | — | ||||||||||||||||
| | 1,631 | | — | | 26.00 | | 7/1/2030 | | — | | — | | — | | — | ||||||||||||||||
| | 2,072 | | 1,036 | (2) | 40.16 | | 4/1/2031 | | — | | — | | — | | — | ||||||||||||||||
| | 1,272 | | 2,545 | (4) | 40.83 | | 4/1/2032 | | — | | — | | — | | — | ||||||||||||||||
| | — | | 4,822 | (6) | 33.46 | | 4/1/2033 | | — | | — | | — | | — | ||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Christopher S. Randall | | 2,096 | | — | | 34.04 | | 3/1/2027 | | 445 | (2) | 16,550 |
| 3,622 | (3) | 134,702 | ||||||||||||||||
| | 6,309 | | — | | 32.65 | | 3/1/2028 | | 924 | (4) | 34,364 |
| 3,682 | (5) | 136,933.58 | ||||||||||||||||
| | 5,683 | | — | | 34.08 | | 4/1/2029 | | 2,035 | (6) | — | | 3,712 | (7) | 138,049 | ||||||||||||||||
| | 3,021 | | — | | 23.10 | | 4/1/2030 | | — | | — | | — | | — | ||||||||||||||||
| | 2,468 | | 1,236 | (2) | 40.16 | | 4/1/2031 | | — | | — | | — | | — | ||||||||||||||||
| | 1,161 | | 2,323 | (4) | 40.83 | | 4/1/2032 | | — | | — | | — | | — | ||||||||||||||||
| | — | | 5,038 | (6) | 33.46 | | 4/1/2033 | | — | | — | | — | | — | ||||||||||||||||
| |
2024 Annual Proxy Statement |
|
| (1) | Based upon the closing price of our common stock on December |
| (2) |
| Represents awards that will vest in full on April 28, 2024, subject to the NEO’s continued service through |
| (3) |
| Amounts shown above represent the performance stock units granted in |
| (4) | Represents awards that vest, subject to the NEO’s continued service through the applicable vesting date, in two equal annual installments, the first of which will occur on April 28, 2024. |
| (5) | Amounts shown above represent the performance stock units granted in 2022 (the “2022 PSU Award”). Since performance through December 31, |
| (6) |
|
|
39
|
|
| Represents awards that vest, subject to the NEO’s continued service through the applicable vesting date, in three equal annual installments, the first of which will occur on April 28, |
| (7) |
|
|
|
|
| (8) | Represents the number of Class B Units of 2UniFi, LLC that were granted on December 11, 2023 under the 2UniFi, LLC 2023 Equity Unit Incentive Plan. 50% of the awards vest upon the third anniversary of the date of grant and 25% of the awards vest upon the fourth and fifth anniversaries of the date of grant. There is no value attributable to these |
|
|
Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 20172023
The following table provides information regarding options exercised and shares of restricted stock vested during 20172023 with respect to each of our NEOs:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Option Exercises and Stock Vested | ||||||
| | Option Awards | | Stock Awards | ||||
|
| Number of shares |
| |
| Number of shares |
| |
| | acquired on | | Value realized on | | acquired on | | Value realized on |
| | exercise | | exercise | | vesting | | vesting |
Name | | (#) | | ($) | | (#) | | ($) |
| | | | | | | | |
G. Timothy Laney(1) |
| 28,000 |
| 532,840 |
| 37,087 | | 1,312,086 |
Aldis Birkans (2) | | 2,600 | | 49,478 | | 10,735 | | 378,088 |
Richard U. Newfield, Jr.(3) | | — | | — | | 11,442 | | 404,142 |
Angela Petrucci(4) | | — | | — | | 3,065 | | 102,664 |
Christopher S. Randall(5) | | — | | — | | 5,300 | | 187,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Option Exercises and Stock Vested | ||||||
|
| Option Awards |
| Stock Awards | ||||
|
| Number of shares |
|
|
| Number of shares |
|
|
|
| acquired on |
| Value realized on |
| acquired on |
| Value realized on |
|
| exercise |
| exercise |
| vesting |
| vesting |
Name |
| (#) |
| ($) |
| (#) |
| ($) |
G. Timothy Laney(1) |
| 500,000 |
| 6,395,000 |
| 182,034 |
| 6,095,730 |
Brian F. Lilly(2) |
| — |
| — |
| 70,299 |
| 2,399,848 |
Zsolt K. Besskó(3) |
| — |
| — |
| 7,607 |
| 243,790 |
Richard U. Newfield, Jr.(4) |
| — |
| — |
| 47,104 |
| 1,577,675 |
Patrick G. Sobers(5) |
| 10,000 |
| 126,400 |
| 2,599 |
| 82,094 |
| (1) |
| Option award for 28,000 shares exercised on |
| |
54 | National Bank Holdings Corporation |
| (2) | Option award for 2,600 shares exercised on December 14, 2023. Stock award include 3,545 and 3,709 performance stock units that vested on March 1, 2023 and April |
|
|
| (3) |
| Stock awards include |
| (4) |
| Stock awards include |
| (5) |
|
|
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan
The NEOs are eligible to participate in our Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan, which we refer to as the “NDCP.” The NDCP, which is meant to be an unfunded deferred compensation plan, is intended to be exempt from certain requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. The NDCP is similar to our 401(k) plan; however, it does not have the statutory limit on contributions that the 401(k) plan has. Executives may participate in the NDCP even if they do not participate in the 401(k) plan. NDCP participants may defer up to 75% of their base salaries and up to 85% of their bonuses (annual incentives) until separation of service or upon the occurrence of other specified events (e.g., disability, previously specified dates, and a change in control). Generally, once a participant makes an election regarding the time of his or her deferred compensation payout, he or she may only modify that election if such modification occurs at least one year before the payout would begin if not modified and does not cause any amounts to be paid to the participant for at least five years after the payout would have begun if not modified. NDCP participants may elect to have their account balances paid in a lump sum upon a change in control. The Company matches participants’
40
contributions to the NDCP in the same way it matches 401(k) plan contributions. Each of the participating NEOs’ contributions to the NDCP and the related Company matching contributions are fully vested when made. Each NDCP participant may choose among a variety of investment options. The Company pays all applicable fees and expenses relating to the administration of the NDCP and may, in its sole discretion, make additional discretionary contributions to participants’ accounts.
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
| |
| Registrant |
| Aggregate |
| |
| Aggregate |
| | Executive | | contributions | | earnings | | Aggregate | | balance at |
| | contributions in | | in last | | in last | | withdrawals/ | | last fiscal |
| | last fiscal year | | fiscal year | | fiscal year | | distributions | | year end |
Name | | ($)(1) | | ($)(2) | | ($)(3) | | ($) | | ($)(4) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
G. Timothy Laney |
| 138,192 | | 64,572 | | 140,278 |
| — |
| 2,077,502 |
Aldis Birkans | | 114,085 | | 27,684 | | 73,207 | | — | | 762,671 |
Richard U. Newfield, Jr. |
| 268,541 | | 23,957 | | 231,810 | | — | | 1,985,270 |
Angela Petrucci | | 36,528 | | 18,596 | | 13,938 | | — | | 155,067 |
Christopher S. Randall | | 19,378 | | 5,813 | | 12,640 |
| — |
| 219,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Registrant |
| Aggregate |
|
|
| Aggregate |
|
| Executive |
| contributions |
| earnings |
|
|
| balance at |
|
| contributions in |
| in last |
| in last |
| Aggregate |
| last fiscal |
|
| last fiscal year |
| fiscal year |
| fiscal year |
| withdrawals/distributions |
| year end |
Name |
| ($) |
| ($)(1) |
| ($) |
| ($) |
| ($)(2) |
G. Timothy Laney |
| 49,280 |
| 36,960 |
| 89,653 |
| — |
| 1,025,124 |
Brian F. Lilly |
| 4,663 |
| 2,812 |
| 68,934 |
| — |
| 497,019 |
Zsolt K. Besskó |
| 19,446 |
| 14,283 |
| 31,769 |
| — |
| 221,590 |
Richard U. Newfield, Jr. |
| 45,599 |
| 13,860 |
| 12,103 |
| — |
| 409,431 |
Patrick G. Sobers |
| 18,534 |
| 11,120 |
| 12,178 |
| — |
| 105,494 |
| (1) |
|
| (2) | These amounts are included in the Summary Compensation Table |
| (3) |
|
|
| (4) | Of these balances, the following were reported in |
| |
2024 Annual Proxy Statement | 55 |
Employment or Change of Control Agreements with Named Executive Officers
Mr. Laney’s Employment Agreement
On May 22, 2010, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Laney. On November 17, 2015, we entered into an amendment to Mr. Laney’s employment agreement. The employment agreement automatically renews for successive one-year terms (ending on December 31) unless either party gives at least 90 days’ written notice prior to the expiration date of the current term. The employment agreement provides Mr. Laney an annual base salary of no less than $750,000, to be reviewed annually, and for a target cash bonus opportunity of no less than 90% of his base salary, to be reviewed annually. The employment agreement also provides Mr. Laney with employee benefits, fringe benefits, and perquisites on a basis no less favorable than such benefits and perquisites are provided to other senior executives. Under the employment agreement, Mr. Laney is subject to restrictive covenants, including non-competition and non-solicitation of our associates, clients and certain other parties with business relationships with us, while employed by us and for either (a) three years following Mr. Laney’s termination of employment, if his employment is terminated by us without “cause” or Mr. Laney resigns with “good reason” within two years following a change in control or (b) one year following Mr. Laney’s termination of employment in the case of all other terminations of employment. In the event of termination of Mr. Laney’s employment without “cause” or Mr. Laney’s resignation with “good reason,” Mr. Laney is eligible to receive certain severance benefits, as more fully described in “2017“2023 Potential Payments upon Termination or Change-in-Control” below. Mr. Laney’s employment agreement also provides that, in the event any payments to Mr. Laney would subject him to the excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code, such payments will be reduced to the extent necessary to avoid imposition of the excise tax unless Mr. Laney would be better off on an after-tax basis receiving all such payments.
In addition, Mr. Laney’s employment agreement contains a clawback provision, which requires, if the Company is required to prepare an accounting restatement due to material noncompliance of the Company with any financial reporting requirement as a result of misconduct, Mr. Laney is to reimburse the Company for all amounts received under any incentive compensation plans and any gains realized on the sale of the Company’s securities, in each case during the 12-month period following the first public issuance or filing with the SEC (whichever first occurs) of the financial document embodying such financial reporting requirement. The clawback provision also provides that if Mr. Laney is found guilty of misconduct by any judicial or administrative authority in connection with any (a) formal investigation by the SEC or (b) other federal or state regulatory investigation, the Compensation Committee may require the repayment
41
of any gain realized on the exercise of an award under any equity compensation plan without regard to the timing of the determination of misconduct in relation to the timing of the exercise of the award.
Mr. Lilly’sBirkans’ Employment Agreement
On November 17, 2015,May 2, 2018, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Lilly,Birkans, which supersedes Mr. Lilly’s letter agreement dated February 13, 2012.became effective August 10, 2018. The employment agreement provides for an initial term through December 31, 2016, which will automatically renewrenews for successive one-year terms (ending on December 31) unless either party gives at least 90 days’ written notice prior to the expiration date of the current term. The employment agreement provides Mr. LillyBirkans an annual base salary of no less than $375,000, to be reviewed annually,$300,000 and a target cash bonus opportunity of no less than 75%50% of base salary to be reviewed annually.for the 2018 fiscal year, and a target bonus opportunity of no less than 55% of base salary for fiscal years thereafter. The employment agreement also provides Mr. LillyBirkans with employee benefits, fringe benefits, and perquisites on a basis no less favorable than such benefits and perquisites are provided to other senior executives. Under the employment agreement, Mr. LillyBirkans is also subject to restrictive covenants, including non-competition and non-solicitation of our associates, clients and certain other parties with business relationships with us, while employed by us and for either (a) two years following Mr. Lilly’sBirkans’ termination of employment, if his employment is terminated by us without “cause” or Mr. LillyBirkans resigns with “good reason” within two years following a change in control or (b) one year following Mr. Lilly’sBirkans’ termination of employment in the case of all other terminations of employment. In the event of termination of Mr. Lilly’sBirkans’ employment without “cause” or Mr. Lilly’sBirkans’ resignation with “good reason,” Mr. LillyBirkans is eligible to receive certain severance benefits, including enhanced severance benefits in the event of a termination of employment within two years following a “change in control,” as more fully described in “2017“2023 Potential Payments upon Termination or Change-in-Control” below. Mr. Lilly’sBirkans’ employment agreement also provides that, in the event any payments to
| |
56 | National Bank Holdings Corporation |
Mr. LillyBirkans would subject him to the excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code, such payments will be reduced to the extent necessary to avoid imposition of the excise tax unless Mr. LillyBirkans would be better off on an after-tax basis receiving all such payments.
In addition, Mr. Lilly’sBirkans’ employment agreement contains a clawback provision similar to that included in Mr. Laney’s employment agreement.
Mr. Besskó’s Employment Agreement
On November 17, 2015, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Besskó, which supersedes Mr. Besskó’s letter agreement dated June 5, 2013. The employment agreement provides for an initial term through December 31, 2016, which will automatically renew for successive one-year terms unless either party gives at least 90 days’ written notice prior to the expiration date of the current term. The employment agreement provides Mr. Besskó an annual base salary of no less than $315,000, to be reviewed annually, and a target cash bonus opportunity of no less than 55% of base salary, to be reviewed annually. The employment agreement also provides Mr. Besskó with employee benefits, fringe benefits, and perquisites on a basis no less favorable than such benefits and perquisites are provided to other senior executives. Under the employment agreement, Mr. Besskó is also subject to restrictive covenants, including non-competition and non-solicitation of our associates, clients and certain other parties with business relationships with us, while employed by us and for either (a) two years following Mr. Besskó’s termination of employment, if his employment is terminated by us without “cause” or Mr. Besskó resigns with “good reason” within two years following a change in control or (b) one year following Mr. Besskó’s termination of employment in the case of all other terminations of employment. In the event of termination of Mr. Besskó’s employment without “cause” or Mr. Besskó’s resignation with “good reason,” Mr. Besskó is eligible to receive certain severance benefits, including enhanced severance benefits in the event of a termination of employment within two years following a “change in control,” as more fully described in “2017 Potential Payments upon Termination or Change-in-Control” below. Mr. Besskó’s employment agreement also provides that, in the event any payments to Mr. Besskó would subject him to the excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code, such payments will be reduced to the extent necessary to avoid imposition of the excise tax unless Mr. Besskó would be better off on an after-tax basis receiving all such payments.
In addition, Mr. Besskó’s employment agreement contains a clawback provision similar to that included in Mr. Laney’s employment agreement.
Mr. Newfield’s Employment Agreement
On November 17, 2015, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Newfield, which amends and restates Mr. Newfield’s employment agreement dated October 24, 2011. The employment agreement provides for an initial term
42
through December 31, 2016, which will automatically renewrenews for successive one-year terms (ending on December 31) unless either party gives at least 90 days’ written notice prior to the expiration date of the current term. The employment agreement provides Mr. Newfield an annual base salary of no less than $325,000, to be reviewed annually, and a target cash bonus opportunity of no less than 60% of base salary, to be reviewed annually. The employment agreement also provides Mr. Newfield with employee benefits, fringe benefits, and perquisites on a basis no less favorable than such benefits and perquisites are provided to other senior executives. Under the employment agreement, Mr. Newfield is also subject to restrictive covenants, including non-competition and non-solicitation of our associates, clients and certain other parties with business relationships with us, while employed by us and for either (a) two years following Mr. Newfield’s termination of employment, if his employment is terminated by us without “cause” or Mr. Newfield resigns with “good reason” within two years following a change in control or (b) one year following Mr. Newfield’s termination of employment in the case of all other terminations of employment. In the event of termination of Mr. Newfield’s employment without “cause” or Mr. Newfield’s resignation with “good reason,” Mr. Newfield is eligible to receive certain severance benefits, including enhanced severance benefits in the event of a termination of employment within two years following a “change in control,” as more fully described in “2017“2023 Potential Payments upon Termination or Change-in-Control” below. Mr. Newfield’s employment agreement also provides that, in the event any payments to Mr. Newfield would subject him to the excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code, such payments will be reduced to the extent necessary to avoid imposition of the excise tax unless Mr. Newfield would be better off on an after-tax basis receiving all such payments.
In addition, Mr. Newfield’s employment agreement contains a clawback provision similar to that included in Mr. Laney’s employment agreement.
Ms. Petrucci’s Employment Agreement
On May 5, 2020, we entered into an employment agreement with Ms. Petrucci. The employment agreement automatically renews for successive one-year terms (ending on December 31) unless either party gives at least 90 days’ written notice prior to the expiration date of the current term. The employment agreement provides Ms. Petrucci an annual base salary of no less than $250,000, to be reviewed annually, and a target cash bonus opportunity of no less than 50% of base salary, to be reviewed annually. The employment agreement also provides Ms. Petrucci with employee benefits, fringe benefits, and perquisites on a basis no less favorable than such benefits and perquisites are provided to other senior executives. Under the employment agreement, Ms. Petrucci is also subject to restrictive covenants, including non-competition and non-solicitation of our associates, clients and certain other parties with business relationships with us, while employed by us and for either (a) two years following Ms. Petrucci’s termination of employment, if her employment is terminated by us without “cause” or Ms. Petrucci resigns with “good reason” within two years following a change in control or (b) one year following Ms. Petrucci’s termination of employment in the case of all other terminations of employment. In the event of termination of Ms. Petrucci’s employment without “cause” or Ms. Petrucci’s resignation with “good reason,” Ms. Petrucci is eligible to receive certain severance benefits, including enhanced severance benefits in the event of a termination of employment within two years following a “change in control,” as more fully described in “2023 Potential Payments upon Termination or Change-in-Control” below. Ms. Petrucci’s employment agreement also provides that, in the event any payments to Ms. Petrucci would subject her to the excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code, such payments will be reduced to the extent necessary to avoid imposition of the excise tax unless Ms. Petrucci would be better off on an after-tax basis receiving all such payments.
| |
2024 Annual Proxy Statement | 57 |
In addition, Ms. Petrucci’s employment agreement contains a clawback provision similar to that included in Mr. Laney’s employment agreement.
Mr. Sobers’Randall’s Change of Control Agreement
On August 1,September 14, 2014, we entered into a change of control agreement with Mr. Sobers.Randall. Under the change of control agreement, Mr. SobersRandall is subject to restrictive covenants, including non-solicitation of our associates, clients and certain other parties with business relationships with us, while employed by us and for one year following Mr. Sobers’Randall’s termination of employment in the case of any termination of employment. In the event of terminationTermination of Mr. Sobers’Randall’s employment without “cause” or Mr. Sobers’Randall’s resignation with “good reason” within eighteen months following a “change in control,” Mr. SobersRandall is eligible to receive certain severance benefits, as more fully described in “2017“2023 Potential Payments upon Termination or Change-in-Control” below. Mr. Sobers’Randall’s change of control agreement also provides that, in the event any payments to Mr. SobersRandall would subject him to the excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code, such payments will be reduced to the extent necessary to avoid imposition of the excise tax unless Mr. SobersRandall would be better off on an after-tax basis receiving all such payments.
20172023 Potential Payments upon Termination or Change-in-Control
The following discussion addresses potential payments to our NEOs upon termination of employment or a change in control.
Termination of Employment without Cause or Resignation with Good Reason Prior to Change in Control
Severance under Mr. Laney’s Employment Agreement
If Mr. Laney’s employment is terminated prior to a change in control (i) by the Company without “cause” or (ii) by Mr. Laney for “good reason,” subject to his execution and non-revocation of a release of claims in favor of the Company, Mr. Laney will receive (a) any earned but unpaid base salary and bonus, (b) a prorated bonus for the year of termination and (c) a lump sum cash amount equal to the sum of (1) three times his annual base salary immediately prior to the date of the qualifying termination and (2) three times the greater of (i) his target annual bonus for the year in which the qualifying termination occurs and (ii) the annual bonus paid or payable to him in respect of the year prior to the year of the qualifying termination.
For the purposes of Mr. Laney’s employment agreement, “cause” means the executive’s (1) continued failure to perform substantially his duties, (2) willful misconduct or gross neglect in the performance of his duties, (3) continued failure to adhere materially to the clear directions of the Board, to adhere materially to the Company’s material written policies, or to devote substantially all of his business time and efforts to the Company, (4) conviction of or formal admission to or
43
plea of guilty or nolo contendere to a charge of commission of a felony or any crime involving serious moral turpitude or (5) willful breach of any material terms of the employment agreement.
For the purposes of Mr. Laney’s employment agreement, “good reason” means (1) a material diminution of annual base salary, (2) a material diminution in title, position, duties or responsibilities, (3) a failure to elect or re-elect Mr. Laney as a member of the Board, (4) during the two-year period following a change in control, any requirement by the Company that the executive’s services be rendered primarily at a location that is more than 50 miles from the executive’s primary employment location immediately prior to the change in control or (5) any material breach by us of the employment agreement.
Severance for NEOs other than Mr. LaneyMessrs. Birkans, Newfield and Ms. Petrucci under Employment Agreements
If the executive’s employment, is terminated prior to a change in control (i) by the Company without “cause” or (ii) by the executive for “good reason,” subject to the executive’s execution and non-revocation of a release of claims in favor of the Company, the executive will receive (a) any earned but unpaid base salary and bonuses, (b) a prorated bonus for the year of termination and (c) a lump sum cash amount equal to the sum
| |
58 | National Bank Holdings Corporation |
of (1) his or her annual base salary immediately prior to the date of the qualifying termination and (2) the greater of (i) his or her target annual bonus for the year in which the qualifying termination occurs and (ii) the annual bonus paid or payable to the executive in respect of the year prior to the year of the qualifying termination.
For the purposes of each executive’s employment agreement, “cause” means the executive’s (1) continued failure to perform substantially his duties, (2) willful misconduct or gross neglect in the performance of his duties, (3) continued failure to adhere materially to the clear directions of the Company’s CEO, to adhere materially to the Company’s material written policies, or to devote substantially all of his business time and efforts to the Company, (4) conviction of or formal admission to or plea of guilty or nolo contendere to a charge of commission of a felony or any crime involving serious moral turpitude or (5) willful breach of any material terms of the employment agreement.
For the purposes of each executive’s employment agreement, “good reason” means (1) a material diminution in the executive’s annual base salary, (2) the assignment of any duties that are materially inconsistent with the executive’s position, duties or responsibilities or any other action by the Company that results in a material diminution in the executive’s position or the duties or responsibilities customarily associated with the executive’s position, (3) during the two-year period following a change in control, any requirement by the Company that the executive’s services be rendered primarily at a location that is more than 50 miles from the executive’s primary employment location immediately prior to the change in control or (4) any material breach by us of the employment agreement.
Equity Awards under the Company’s Equity Incentive Plans
Time-Based Stock Options and Restricted Stock Awards. All unvested time-based stock options and restricted stock awards will be forfeited followingupon a termination of employment prior to a change in control without “cause” or the executive’s resignation of employment for “good reason.”
Market-Based Performance Restricted Stock Unit Awards. With respect to the market-based performance restricted stock unit awards granted to Messrs. Lilly, Besskó and Newfield in 2016, uponthe NEOs, all unvested awards will be forfeited following any termination of employment.
2UniFi Profits Interests Awards. In the event of a termination of employment prior to a change in control without “cause” or, the portion of the Executive’s Class B Units of 2UniFi, LLC that is scheduled to vest within the twelve-month period following the date of termination shall immediately vest. If the Executive resigns for good reason prior to a resignationchange in control, the Executive’s Class B Units of employment for “good reason,” any remaining service conditions are deemed to have been satisfied and the awards will vest (the performance conditions for these awards have been satisfied).
Performance Stock Unit Awards. With respect to the performance stock unit awards granted to the NEOs in 2016 and 2017, all unvested awards2UniFi, LLC will be forfeited following any termination of employment.forfeited.
For purposes of the equity awards, the definitions of “cause” and “good reason” are governed by the respective equity award agreements and in most cases, the definitions are similar to those set forth in the NEOs’ employment or change of control agreements, as applicable.
Termination of Employment for Retirement
A termination of employment for retirement is treated similarly to a resignation without good reason for both the restricted stock awards and the performance share unit awards. However, the Company’s option award agreements and the 2UniFi Profits Interests Awards do allow for continued vesting of the awards according to the existing vesting schedule in the event of a resignation for retirement prior to a change in control.
In the event of a termination of employment for retirement, the Executive’s Class B Units of 2UniFi, LLC will continue to vest according to the existing vesting schedule, provided that if a change in control occurs after such termination, any unvested Class B Units of 2UniFi, LLC (if any) then held by such Executive will immediately vest.
The definition of “retirement” for purposes of the option award agreements generally means that an Executive has reached the age of 60 and has worked for the Company or its predecessor organizations for at least 10 years.
The definition of “retirement” for purposes of the Class B Units of 2UniFi, LLC means that an Executive has reached the age of 65 and has worked for the Company, its predecessors or affiliates for at least 10 years.
Termination of Employment for Cause or Resignation without Good Reason
Upon a termination of employment for “cause” or the executive’s resignation of employment without “good reason” at any time, the executive is entitled to accrued benefits, including accrued base salary as of the date of termination of
44
employment, and the timely payment of any amounts due and payable under any of our plans, programs, policies or practices.
| |
2024 Annual Proxy Statement | 59 |
All unvested equity awards (excluding the Class B Units of 2UniFi, LLC) will be forfeited following a termination of employment for “cause” or the executive’s resignation of employment without “good reason.” For Class B Units of 2UniFi, LLC, all unvested units will be forfeited upon any resignation and all vested and unvested Class B Units of 2UniFi, LLC will be forfeited upon a termination of employment for “cause”.
Termination of Employment due to Death or Disability
Upon a termination of employment due to death or disability, the executive is entitled to accrued benefits, including accrued base salary, as of the date of termination of employment, and the timely payment of any amounts due and payable under any of our plans, programs, policies or practices. All unvested equity awards (including the Class B Units of 2UniFi, LLC) will vest upon a termination of employment due to death or disability, other than the performance stock unit awards, or market-based performance restricted stock awards granted to Messrs. Lilly, Besskó and Newfield in 2016, in which case upon a termination of employment due to death or disability, any remaining service conditions are deemed to have been satisfied and the awards will vest to the extent the performance conditions have been satisfiedbe forfeited effective as of the date of termination or are satisfied during the period beginning on the termination date and ending on the earlier of the first anniversary of the termination date and the expiration date of the award.termination.
Arrangements upon a Change in Control
Severance for NEOs under Employment, (or Change of Control)Control or Transition Agreements
If Messrs. Laney, Lilly, Besskó,Birkans, Newfield, Randall or Sobers’Ms. Petrucci’s employment is terminated within two years (eighteen months for Mr. Sobers) following a change in control (similar definition to that in the Company’s equity incentive plans) (i) without “cause” or (ii) by the executive for “good reason,” subject to the executive’s execution and non-revocation of a release of claims in favor of the Company, the executive will receive a lump sum cash amount equal to (a) any earned but unpaid base salary and bonuses and (b) except for Mr. Sobers,Randall, a prorated bonus for the year of termination.
Additionally, Mr. Laney will receive a lump sum cash amount equal to the sum of (1) three times his annual base salary immediately prior to the qualifying termination (or if greater, immediately prior to the change in control) and (2) three times the greater of (i) his target annual bonus determined under his employment agreement and (ii) the annual bonus paid or payable to him in respect of the year immediately prior to the year in which the termination occurs. Messrs. Lilly, BesskóBirkans and Newfield and Ms. Petrucci will receive a lump sum cash amount equal to the sum of (1) two times their annual base salary immediately prior to the qualifying termination (or if greater, immediately prior to the change in control) and (2) two times the greater of (i) their target annual bonus determined under their employment agreement and (ii) the annual bonus paid or payable to them in respect of the year immediately prior to the year in which the termination occurs. Mr. SobersRandall will receive a lump sum cash amount equal to the sum of (1) his annual base salary immediately prior to the qualifying termination (or if greater, immediately prior to the change in control) and (2) the greater of (i) his target annual bonus for the year in which the termination occurs and (ii) the annual bonus paid or payable to him in respect of the year immediately prior to the year in which the termination occurs.
Equity Awards under the Company’s Equity Incentive Plans
Time-Based Stock Options and Restricted Stock Awards. With respect to awards granted prior to 2016, allAll unvested outstanding time-based stock options and restricted stock awards held by the NEOs fully vest, and in the case of stock options, become exercisable, upon a change in control (as defined in the Company’s equity incentive plans). With respect to awards granted in 2016 and thereafter, all time-based stock options and restricted stock awards held by the NEOs are subject to a double trigger vesting standard. If the executive is provided a replacement award in connection with a change in control (as defined in the Company’s equity plans), and if the executive’s employment is terminated within two years following the change in control (i) by the Company without “cause” or (ii) by the executive for “good reason,” all unvested outstanding time-based stock options and restricted stock awards held by the executive fully vest, and in the case of stock options, become exercisable, upon the qualifying termination. If the executive is not provided a replacement award, the award fully vests, and in the case of stock options, becomes exercisable, upon the change in control.
Market-Based Performance Restricted Stock Awards. The market-based performance restricted stock awards granted to certain of the NEOs in 2016 are subject to a double trigger vesting standard in the event of a change in control. If the executive is provided a replacement award in connection with a change in control, and if the executive’s employment is
45
terminated within two years following the change in control (i) by the Company without “cause” or (ii) by the executive for “good reason,” all unvested outstanding restricted stock awards fully vest. If the executive is not provided a replacement award, the award fully vests upon the change in control.
Performance Stock Unit Awards. With respect to the performance stock unit awards granted to the NEOs, in 2016 and 2017, in connection with a change in control (as defined in the Company’s equity plans), the performance achievement level of any outstanding unvested awards will be determined prior to the change of control by the Compensation Committee, with awards earned at the higher of target and actual performance. If the executive is provided a replacement award in connection with a change in control, then the earned award continues to be subject to service-based vesting requirements with the vesting date being the last day of the
| |
60 | National Bank Holdings Corporation |
original performance period. If the executive’s employment is terminated within two years following the change in control (i) by the Company without “cause,” (ii) by the executive for “good reason,” or (iii) due to the executive’s death or disability, any remaining service condition will be deemed to be satisfied and the earned award fully vests upon the qualifying termination. If the executive is not provided a replacement award, the service condition will be deemed to be satisfied and the earned award fully vests upon the change in control.
2UniFi Profits Interests Awards. If the Company experiences a change in control, and if the executive’s employment is terminated within two years following the change in control (as defined in the Company’s 2023 Omnibus Incentive Plan) (i) by the Company without “cause”, (ii) by the executive for “good reason” or “retirement” or (iii) due to death or disability, all unvested outstanding Class B Units of 2UniFi, LLC held by the executive will fully vest. Upon a 2UniFi, LLC change in control (as defined in the 2UniFi, LLC 2023 Equity Unit Incentive Plan), (i) if the Executive is not primarily providing services to 2UniFi, LLC, and following the change in control will not be employed by 2UniFi, such awards shall immediately vest, and (ii) if the Executive is primarily providing services to 2UniFi, LLC and is employed by the entity following the change of control but is subsequently terminated within two years following the change in control (A) by the Company without “cause” (B) by the Executive for “good reason” or “retirement”, or (C) due to death or disability, all unvested outstanding Class B Units of 2UniFi, LLC held by the Executive will fully vest.
Change in Control Definition.A The definition of change in control for any equity awards granted by the Company are defined specifically in the Company’s 2023 Omnibus Incentive Plan or the Company’s 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan as applicable, and generally means an acquisition of a substantial majority of the outstanding shares, a change in directors of the Board, the approval of a dissolution or a merger, sale or combination of the Company’s assets. The definition of an NBHC change in control for purposes of the 2UniFi profits interests is the same as the definition under the Company’s 2023 Omnibus Incentive Plan and the definition of a 2UniFi, LLC change in control is generally deemeddefined in the 2UniFi, LLC 2023 Equity Unit Incentive Plan and is similar to occur under the Company’s equity incentive plans upon:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
For the NEOs serving as of December 31, 2017, the potential payments upon termination under various termination scenarios or the occurrence of aand NBHC change in control are quantified in the table set forth below (assuming a termination datebut requires an acquisition of December 31, 2017 and2UniFi, LLC by an NBHC share price of $32.43, the closing price of NBHC common stock on the NYSE on December 29, 2017 (the NYSE was closed Sunday, December 31, 2017)):unrelated third party.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Stock |
| Restricted |
|
|
|
|
|
| Cash |
| option |
| stock |
|
|
|
|
|
| severance |
| vesting |
| vesting |
| Total |
Name |
| Scenario |
| ($)(1) |
| ($) |
| ($) |
| ($)(2) |
G. Timothy Laney |
| Voluntary Resignation without Good Reason |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
| Voluntary Resignation with Good Reason or Involuntary Termination not for Cause |
| 5,143,000 |
| — |
| — |
| 5,143,000 |
|
| Involuntary Termination for Cause |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
| Involuntary Termination Following Change in Control |
| 4,950,000 |
| 569,366 |
| 2,700,316 |
| 8,219,682 |
|
| Change in Control -No Termination of Employment(3) |
| — |
| 142,391 |
| 345,898 |
| 488,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| — |
Brian F. Lilly |
| Voluntary Resignation without Good Reason |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
| Voluntary Resignation with Good Reason or Involuntary Termination not for Cause |
| 1,018,000 |
| — |
| 574,984 | (4) | 1,592,984 |
|
| Involuntary Termination for Cause |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
| Involuntary Termination Following Change in Control |
| 1,593,750 |
| 243,515 |
| 1,819,007 |
| 3,656,272 |
|
| Change in Control -No Termination of Employment(3) |
| — |
| 60,529 |
| 235,085 |
| 295,614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zsolt K. Besskó |
| Voluntary Resignation without Good Reason |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
| Voluntary Resignation with Good Reason or Involuntary Termination not for Cause |
| 747,000 |
| — |
| 143,730 | (4) | 890,730 |
|
| Involuntary Termination for Cause |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
| Involuntary Termination Following Change in Control |
| 1,197,000 |
| 135,379 |
| 875,691 |
| 2,208,070 |
|
| Change in Control -No Termination of Employment(3) |
| — |
| 32,908 |
| 156,021 |
| 188,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard U. Newfield, Jr. |
| Voluntary Resignation without Good Reason |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
| Voluntary Resignation with Good Reason or Involuntary Termination not for Cause |
| 741,500 |
| — |
| 143,730 | (4) | 885,230 |
|
| Involuntary Termination for Cause |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
| Involuntary Termination Following Change in Control |
| 1,235,000 |
| 149,349 |
| 892,449 |
| 2,276,798 |
|
| Change in Control -No Termination of Employment(3) |
| — |
| 37,020 |
| 142,789 |
| 179,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patrick G. Sobers |
| Voluntary Resignation without Good Reason |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
| Voluntary Resignation with Good Reason or Involuntary Termination not for Cause |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
| Involuntary Termination for Cause |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
| Involuntary Termination Following Change in Control |
| 398,750 |
| 38,784 |
| 207,666 |
| 645,200 |
|
| Change in Control -No Termination of Employment(3) |
| — |
| 12,349 |
| 47,607 |
| 59,956 |
| |
2024 Annual Proxy Statement |
|
2023 Potential Payments upon Termination or Change-in-Control Table
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Stock | | Restricted | | |
| | | | Cash | | option | | stock | | |
|
| |
| severance |
| vesting |
| vesting |
| Total |
Name |
| Scenario |
| ($)(1) |
| ($) |
| ($) |
| ($)(2) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
G. Timothy Laney | | Voluntary Resignation without Good Reason | | — | | — | | — | | — |
| | Voluntary Resignation with Good Reason or Involuntary Termination not for Cause | | 7,571,562 | | — | | — | | 7,571,562 |
| | Involuntary Termination for Cause | | — | | — | | — | | — |
| | Involuntary Termination or Voluntary Resignation with Good Reason Following Change in Control | | 7,307,212 | | 47,749 | | 2,690,548 | | 10,045,509 |
| | Change in Control - No Termination of Employment(3) | | — | | — | | — | | — |
| | Death or Disability - No Change in Control | | — | | 47,749 | | 799,436 | | 847,185 |
| | Death or Disability Following Change in Control(3) | | — | | 47,749 | | 2,690,548 | | 2,738,297 |
| | Retirement(4) | | — | | — | | — | | — |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Aldis Birkans | | Voluntary Resignation without Good Reason | | — | | — | | — | | — |
| | Voluntary Resignation with Good Reason or Involuntary Termination not for Cause | | 1,409,616 | | — | | — | | 1,409,616 |
| | Involuntary Termination for Cause | | — | | — | | — | | — |
| | Involuntary Termination or Voluntary Resignation with Good Reason Following Change in Control | | 2,266,928 | | 11,819 | | 924,543 | | 3,203,290 |
| | Change in Control - No Termination of Employment(3) | | — | | — | | — | | — |
| | Death or Disability - No Change in Control | | — | | 11,819 | | 277,251 | | 289,070 |
| | Death or Disability Following Change in Control(3) | | — | | 11,819 | | 924,543 | | 936,362 |
| | Retirement(4) | | — | | — | | — | | — |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Richard U. Newfield, Jr. | | Voluntary Resignation without Good Reason | | — | | — | | — | | — |
| | Voluntary Resignation with Good Reason or Involuntary Termination not for Cause | | 1,150,298 | | — | | — | | 1,150,298 |
| | Involuntary Termination for Cause | | — | | — | | — | | — |
| | Involuntary Termination or Voluntary Resignation with Good Reason Following Change in Control | | 1,877,136 | | 3,943 | | 757,040 | | 2,638,119 |
| | Change in Control - No Termination of Employment(3) | | — | | — | | — | | — |
| | Death or Disability - No Change in Control | | — | | 3,943 | | 220,500 | | 224,443 |
| | Death or Disability Following Change in Control(3) | | — | | 3,943 | | 757,040 | | 760,983 |
| | Retirement(4) | | — | | — | | — | | — |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Angela N. Petrucci | | Voluntary Resignation without Good Reason | | — | | — | | — | | — |
| | Voluntary Resignation with Good Reason or Involuntary Termination not for Cause | | 879,988 | | — | | — | | 879,988 |
| | Involuntary Termination for Cause | | — | | — | | — | | — |
| | Involuntary Termination or Voluntary Resignation with Good Reason Following Change in Control | | 1,444,626 | | 5,645 | | 438,024 | | 1,888,295 |
| | Change in Control - No Termination of Employment(3) | | — | | — | | — | | — |
| | Death or Disability - No Change in Control | | — | | 5,645 | | 130,611 | | 136,256 |
| | Death or Disability Following Change in Control(3) | | — | | 5,645 | | 438,024 | | 443,669 |
| | Retirement(4) | | — | | — | | — | | — |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Christopher S. Randall | | Voluntary Resignation without Good Reason | | — | | — | | — | | — |
| | Voluntary Resignation with Good Reason or Involuntary Termination not for Cause | | — | | — | | — | | — |
| | Involuntary Termination for Cause | | — | | — | | — | | — |
| | Involuntary Termination or Voluntary Resignation with Good Reason Following Change in Control | | 523,779 | | 6,665 | | 445,685 | | 976,129 |
| | Change in Control - No Termination of Employment(3) | | — | | — | | — | | — |
| | Death or Disability - No Change in Control | | — | | 6,665 | | 126,595 | | 133,260 |
| | Death or Disability Following Change in Control(3) | | — | | 6,665 | | 445,685 | | 452,350 |
| | Retirement(4) | | — | | — | | — | | — |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| (1) | Severance amounts are based on the terms of the applicable employment (or change of control) agreements. Under the employment agreements, the prorated bonus for the year of termination is calculated using the target annual bonus amount in the event of an involuntary termination following a change in control. |
| |
62 | National Bank Holdings Corporation |
| (2) |
| Amounts listed do not account for any reduction of payments under the terms of the applicable employment agreements due to the imposition of excise taxes under Section 4999 of the Code. See “Employment Agreements with Named Executive Officers” above. |
| (3) |
| Assumes that the NEO’s |
| (4) |
|
|
47
December 31, 2023. The potential payments upon termination under various termination scenarios or the occurrence of a change in control are quantified in the table set forth above (assuming a termination date of December 31, 2023 and an NBHC share price of $37.19, the closing price of NBHC common stock on the NYSE on Friday, December 29, 2023). For purposes of this table, no amounts are attributable to the Class B Units of 2UniFi, LLC as those awards did not have a liquidation value as of December 31, 2023.
CEO Pay Ratio
CEOPayRatio
We are providing theThe following information provides details about the relationship of the total compensation of our median associate and that of our Chairman, President and CEO:
SEC rules require us to determine our median associate only once every three years, provided that there have been no material changes in our associate population or associate compensation arrangements. We are using the same median associate for our 2023 pay ratio calculation as we used for the 2022 calculation. We have not had a significant acquisition, divestiture or reduction in our workforce and the Company’s compensation practices have not changed during 2023 in a way that could significantly impact the pay ratio or median employee. Further, the designated median associate’s title, job responsibilities and circumstances have remained similar throughout 2023.
For 2017,2023, the median annual total compensation of all associates of the Company (other than our CEO) was $45,353$69,197 and the the annual total compensation of our CEO was $2,716,712.$3,578,101. Based on this information, the ratio for 20172023 total compensation of our CEO to the median of all associates is 59.9:52:1.
WeAs disclosed in our prior proxy statements, we completed the following steps to determine the annual total compensation of our median associate:
| ● |
| As of October 15, |
| ● |
| To find the median of the annual total compensation of our associates (other than our CEO), we used wages from our payroll records as reported on Form W-2 for fiscal |
| ● |
| We identified our median associate using this compensation measure and methodology, which was consistently applied to all our associates included in the calculation. |
| ● |
| After identifying the median associate, we added together all the elements of such associate’s compensation for |
| ● |
| With respect to the annual total compensation of our CEO, we used the amount reported in the “Total” column of our |
| |
2024 Annual Proxy Statement | 63 |
PayVersusPerformanceDisclosure
SECTION
In accordance with rules adopted by the SEC, we provide the following disclosure regarding the relationship between executive compensation actually paid for our principal executive officer (“PEO”), G. Timothy Laney, and our Non-PEO NEO’s (as a group) and certain financial performance measures of the Company for the fiscal years listed below. The Compensation Committee did not consider the pay versus performance disclosure below in making its pay decisions for any of the years shown.
| | | | | | | ||
Year | Summary | Compensation | Average | Average | Value of Initial | Net Income | Adjusted | |
| Laney¹ | ($) | Non-PEO NEOs1 | NEOs1,2,4 | TSR | Peer | | |
(a) | (b) | (c) | (d) | (e) | (f) | (g) | (h) | (i) |
2023 | 3,578,101 | 3,258,465 | 1,030,317 | 978,460 | 116.81 | 101.77 | 142.0 | 3.73 |
2022 | 3,290,389 | 2,753,340 | 1,012,024 | 848,531 | 128.11 | 106.02 | 71.3 | 3.03 |
2021 | 3,009,547 | 5,550,207 | 957,694 | 1,442,256 | 130.93 | 117.08 | 93.6 | 3.05 |
2020 | 2,638,125 | 3,091,647 | 749,558 | 865,017 | 95.54 | 87.90 | 88.6 | 2.91 |
| 1. | G. Timothy Laney was our PEO for each year presented. The individuals comprising the Non-PEO NEOs for each year presented are listed below. |
| |||
2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
Aldis Birkans | Aldis Birkans | Aldis Birkans | Aldis Birkans |
Richard U. Newfield Jr. | Richard U. Newfield Jr. | Richard U. Newfield Jr. | Richard U. Newfield Jr. |
Brendan Zahl | Brendan Zahl | Christopher S. Randall | Christopher S. Randall |
Christopher S. Randall | Angela N. Petrucci | Angela N. Petrucci | Angela N. Petrucci |
Zsolt K. Besskó | |
| 2. | The amounts shown for Compensation Actually Paid have been calculated in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K and do not reflect compensation actually earned, realized, or received by the Company’s NEOs. These amounts reflect the amounts set forth in the “Total” column in the Summary Compensation Table with certain adjustments as described in footnotes 3 and 4 below. |
| 3. | Compensation Actually Paid reflects the exclusions and inclusions of certain amounts for the PEO as set forth below. Equity values are calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Amounts in the Exclusion of Stock Awards and Option Awards column are the totals from the Stock Awards and Option Awards columns set forth in the Summary Compensation Table. |
Year | Summary Compensation Table Total for G. Timothy Laney | Exclusion of Stock Awards and Option Awards for G. Timothy Laney | Inclusion of Equity Values for G. Timothy Laney | Compensation Actually Paid to G. Timothy Laney |
2023 | 3,578,101 | (1,441,511) | 1,121,875 | 3,258,465 |
2022 | 3,290,389 | (1,049,904) | 512,855 | 2,753,340 |
2021 | 3,009,547 | (1,186,672) | 3,727,332 | 5,550,207 |
2020 | 2,638,125 | (1,049,955) | 1,503,477 | 3,091,647 |
The amounts in the Inclusion of Equity Values in the tables above are derived from the amounts set forth in the following tables. The valuation assumptions used to calculate fair values did not materially differ from those disclosed at the time of grant.
| |
64 | National Bank Holdings Corporation |
Year | Year-End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted During Year That Remained Unvested as of Last Day of Year for G. Timothy Laney | Change in Fair Value from Last Day of Prior Year to Last Day of Year of Unvested Equity Awards for G. Timothy Laney | Vesting-Date Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted During Year that Vested During Year for G. Timothy Laney | Change in Fair Value from Last Day of Prior Year to Vesting Date of Unvested Equity Awards that Vested During Year for G. Timothy Laney | Fair Value at Last Day of Prior Year of Equity Awards Forfeited During Year for G. Timothy Laney | Value of Dividends or Other Earnings Paid on Equity Awards Not Otherwise Included for G. Timothy Laney | Total - Inclusion of |
2023 | 1,620,838 | 8,005 | — | (528,891) | — | 21,922 | 1,121,875 |
2022 | 807,175 | 9,633 | — | (323,368) | — | 19,416 | 512,855 |
2021 | 1,371,004 | 1,743,632 | — | 592,202 | — | 20,494 | 3,727,332 |
2020 | 1,755,817 | 55,149 | — | (326,015) | — | 18,526 | 1,503,477 |
| 4. | Compensation Actually Paid reflects the exclusions and inclusions of certain amounts for the Non-PEO NEOs (as a group) as set forth below. Equity values are calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Amounts in the Exclusion of Stock Awards and Option Awards column are the totals from the Stock Awards and Option Awards columns set forth in the Summary Compensation Table. See footnote 1 for the names of non-PEO NEOs included in the calculation for each fiscal year. |
Year | Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO NEOs | Average Exclusion of Stock Awards and Option Awards for Non-PEO NEOs | Average Inclusion of Equity Values for Non-PEO NEOs | Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs |
2023 | 1,030,317 | (309,897) | 258,040 | 978,460 |
2022 | 1,012,024 | (303,194) | 139,701 | 848,531 |
2021 | 957,694 | (302,312) | 786,874 | 1,442,256 |
2020 | 749,558 | (235,359) | 350,818 | 865,017 |
| |
2024 Annual Proxy Statement | 65 |
The amounts in the Inclusion of Equity Values in the tables above are derived from the amounts set forth in the following tables. The valuation assumptions used to calculate fair values did not materially differ from those disclosed at the time of grant.
Year | Average Year-End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted During Year That Remained Unvested as of Last Day of Year for Non-PEO NEOs | Average Change in Fair Value from Last Day of Prior Year to Last Day of Year of Unvested Equity Awards for Non-PEO NEOs | Average Vesting-Date Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted During Year that Vested During Year for Non-PEO NEOs | Average Change in Fair Value from Last Day of Prior Year to Vesting Date of Unvested Equity Awards that Vested During Year for Non-PEO NEOs | Average Fair Value at Last Day of Prior Year of Equity Awards Forfeited During Year for Non-PEO NEOs | Average Value of Dividends or Other Earnings Paid on Equity Awards Not Otherwise Included for Non-PEO NEOs | Total - Average Inclusion of |
2023 | 349,133 | 10,329 | — | (106,210) | — | 4,788 | 258,040 |
2022 | 196,870 | 1,373 | — | (62,736) | — | 4,194 | 139,701 |
2021 | 349,664 | 323,957 | — | 108,347 | — | 4,906 | 786,874 |
2020 | 393,596 | 6,256 | — | (54,058) | — | 5,024 | 350,818 |
| 5. | The Peer Group TSR set forth in this table utilizes the KRX Index, which we also utilize in the stock performance graph required by Item 201(e) of Regulation S-K included in our Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2023. The comparison assumes $100 was invested for the period starting December 31, 2019, through the end of the applicable fiscal year in the Company and in the KRX Index, respectively. Historical stock performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock performance. |
| 6. | We determined adjusted diluted earnings per share (“Adjusted Diluted EPS”) to be the most important financial performance measure used to link Company performance to Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO and Non-PEO NEOs in 2023, which is the Company-based financial performance metric we used for our 2023 annual PSU grants, as described in more detail in the “Three-Year Performance Stock Unit Award” above. For purposes of this “Pay Versus Performance Disclosure” section, we have calculated the Adjusted Diluted EPS based on the methodology described in “Three-Year Performance Stock Unit Award”, other than that the Adjusted Diluted EPS is calculated over the one-year period for each applicable fiscal year (instead of a 3-year period) as required by Item 402(v) of Reg S-K. Adjusted Diluted EPS is a non-GAAP measure that is adjusted to eliminate the effects of the following: (a) changes in law or accounting principles, (b) one-time effects of mergers and acquisitions charges, (c) gains or losses on the extinguishment of debt or the sale of investment securities, (d) restructuring charges and (e) other extraordinary items that the Compensation Committee deems appropriate. A reconciliation of this measure to the comparable GAAP financial measure appears in Appendix A. This performance measure may not have been the most important financial performance measure for previous years and we may determine a different financial performance measure to be the most important financial performance measure in future years. |
| |
66 | National Bank Holdings Corporation |
Relationship Between PEO and Average Non-PEO NEO Compensation Actually Paid, Company Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”) and Peer Group TSR
The following chart sets forth the relationship between the amount of Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO, the average amount of Compensation Actually Paid to our Non-PEO NEOs, and the Company’s cumulative TSR compared to the Peer Group TSR over the four most recently completed fiscal years.
| |
2024 Annual Proxy Statement | 67 |
Relationship Between PEO and Average Non-PEO NEO Compensation Actually Paid and Net Income
The following chart sets forth the amount of Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO, the average amount of Compensation Actually Paid to our Non-PEO NEOs, and our net income during the four most recently completed fiscal years.
| |
68 | National Bank Holdings Corporation |
Relationship Between PEO and Average Non-PEO NEO Compensation Actually Paid and Adjusted Diluted EPS
The following chart sets forth the amount of Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO, the average amount of Compensation Actually Paid to our Non-PEO NEOs, and our Adjusted Diluted EPS during the four most recently completed fiscal years.
Tabular List of Most Important Financial Performance Measures
The following table presents the financial performance measures that the Company considers to have been the most important in linking Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO and Non-PEO NEOs for 2023 to Company performance. The measures in this table are not ranked.
|
Core Net Income |
Asset Quality (Non-Performing Assets Ratio) |
Relative Total Shareholder Return (rTSR) |
Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share (Adjuted Diluted EPS) |
| |
2024 Annual Proxy Statement | 69 |
Section 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCEBeneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities, to file reports of ownership of, and transactions in, the Company’s equity securities with the SEC. Such reporting persons are also required to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) reports that they file. Based solely on a review of the copies of such reports received by the Company, and on written representations from certain reporting persons, the Company believes that none of such reporting person failed to file on a timely basis reports required by Section 16(a) during 2017.2023.
Other Business
Except as set forth herein, our Board and management have no knowledge of any other business to come before the Meeting. If, however, any other matters do properly come before the Meeting, it is the intention of the persons appointed in the accompanying proxy to vote the shares represented by such proxy in accordance with their best judgment.
2019 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders
Shareholder Proposals
Shareholder proposals submitted pursuant to SEC Rule 14a-8 of Regulation 14A for inclusion in our 20192025 Proxy Statement and acted upon at our 20192025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “20192025 Annual Meeting”) must be received by us at our principal executive offices, to the attention of the Secretary, on or prior to November 26, 201829, 2024 and must satisfy the requirements of SEC Rule 14a-8. We suggest that such proposals be sent by certified mail, return receipt requested.
Shareholder proposals submitted for consideration at the 20192025 Annual Meeting but not submitted pursuant to SEC Rule 14a-8, including shareholder nominations for candidates for election as directors, generally must be delivered to the Secretary at our principal executive offices not later than 90 days nor earlier than 120 days before the first anniversary of the date of the 20182024 Annual Meeting. As a result, any notice given by a shareholder pursuant to the provisions of our Bylaws (other than notice pursuant to SEC Rule 14a-8) must be received no earlier than January 2, 20191, 2025 and no later than February 1, 2019.January 31, 2025. Shareholder proposals or nominations must include the specified information concerning the
48
shareholder and the proposal or nominee as described in Section 2.9(C) of our Bylaws. Each such notice must include, among other things:
| ● |
| for each matter, a brief description thereof and the reasons for conducting such business at the annual meeting; |
| ● |
| the name and address of the shareholder proposing such business as well as any affiliates or associates acting in concert with such shareholder; |
| ● |
| the number of shares of each class of NBHC stock owned by such shareholder; |
| ● |
| a description of all ownership interests in the shares identified, including derivative securities, hedged positions and other economic and voting interests; and |
| ● |
| any material interest of such shareholder in such proposal, including any other information required to be disclosed in a proxy statement pursuant to Section 14 of the Exchange Act and the SEC rules thereunder. |
In addition, to comply with the universal proxy rules, stockholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than the Company’s nominees must provide notice that sets forth the information required by Rule 14a-19 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 no later than March 2, 2025.
| |
70 | National Bank Holdings Corporation |
Further information regarding the process for shareholder nominations for candidates for election as directors is provided under “Director Nomination Process, Director Qualifications and Diversity” elsewhere in this proxy statement.
Discretionary Authority Conferred in Proxy Solicited by the Company
The proxy solicited by the Company for the 20192025 Annual Meeting will confer discretionary authority on the Company’s proxies on (i) any proposal presented by a shareholder at that meeting for which the Company has not been provided with notice on or prior to February 1, 2019January 31, 2025 and (ii) any proposal made in accordance with Company’s Bylaws provisions if the 20192025 Proxy Statement briefly describes the matter and how the Company’s proxies intend to vote on it and if the shareholder does not comply with the requirements of Rule 14a-4(c)(2) under the Exchange Act.
“HOUSEHOLDING” OF PROXY MATERIALS
Only one proxy statement and annual report may be delivered to multiple shareholders who share the same address unless we have received contrary instructions from one or more of the shareholders. This procedure, known as “householding,” reduces our printing costs, mailing costs and fees. Shareholders who participate in householding will continue to be able to receive separate proxy cards. If you reside at an address that received only one copy of our Proxy Materials as a result of householding, requests for additional copies should be directed to National Bank Holdings Corporation, Attention: Investor Relations, 7800 E. Orchard Road, Suite 300, Greenwood Village, CO 80111 (telephone number: 720-554-6640; e-mail: ir@nationalbankholdings.com). If you object to householding and wish to receive separate copies of documents in the future, or if you received multiple copies of your Proxy Materials at a single address and would like to request delivery of a single copy in the future, you may contact Investor Relations as described above if you are a holder of record. If you hold your shares through a bank, broker or other holder of record, you should contact such holder of record.
l
Summary and Reconciliationx
| |
2024 Annual Proxy Statement | 71 |
APPENDIX A
SUMMARY AND RECONCILIATION OF CERTAIN NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
“Core net income” is aAdjusted Diluted Earnings per Share”, “Return on Average Tangible Common Equity”, “Return on Average Tangible Assets” and “Tangible Book Value” are supplemental measuremeasures that isare not required by, or are not presented in accordance with, U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). We refer to thiseach of these financial measuremeasures as a “non-GAAP financial measure.” The Compensation Committee considers thisthese non-GAAP financial measuremeasures to be useful for assessing performance underof the 2017 STIP.Company. We believe that thisthese non-GAAP financial measuremeasures provides meaningful supplemental information regarding our performance by excluding certain expenditures or assets that we believe are not indicative of our primary business operating results or by presenting certain metrics on a fully taxable equivalent basis. We believe that management and investors benefit from referring to thisthese non-GAAP financial measuremeasures in assessing our performance and when planning, forecasting, analyzing and comparing past, present and future periods.
ThisThese non-GAAP financial measuremeasures should not be considered a substitute for financial information presented in accordance with GAAP and you should not rely on non-GAAP financial measures alone as measures of our performance. The non-GAAP financial measures we present may differ from non-GAAP financial measures used by our peers or other companies. We compensate for these limitations by providing the following reconciliation belowbelow.
Adjusted net income ($ in thousands) and adjusted earnings per share*
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the year ended | | For the year ended | | For the year ended | | For the year ended | ||||
|
| December 31, 2023 |
| December 31, 2022 |
| December 31, 2021 |
| December 31, 2020 | ||||
Adjustments to net income: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 142,048 | | $ | 71,274 | | $ | 93,606 | | $ | 88,591 |
Add: adjustments, after tax (non-GAAP)(1) | |
| 528 | | | 28,009 | | | 1,258 | | | 1,857 |
Adjusted net income (non-GAAP) | | $ | 142,576 | | $ | 99,283 | | $ | 94,864 | | $ | 90,448 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Adjustments to earnings per share: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings per share diluted | | $ | 3.72 | | | 2.18 | | $ | 3.01 | | $ | 2.85 |
Add: adjustments, after tax (non-GAAP)(1) | |
| 0.01 | | | 0.85 | | | 0.04 | | | 0.06 |
Adjusted earnings per share - diluted (non-GAAP) | | $ | 3.73 | | | 3.03 | | $ | 3.05 | | $ | 2.91 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1)Adjustments: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Acquisition-related expenses, after tax | | $ | 739 | | $ | 28,303 | | $ | — | | $ | — |
Restructuring charges, after tax | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 1,806 |
Excess (tax benefit) expense on stock-based compensation | | | (211) | | | (294) | | | (644) | | | 51 |
Other non-recurring transaction costs, after tax | | | — | | | — | | | 1,902 | | | — |
Adjustments, after tax (non-GAAP) | | $ | 528 | | $ | 28,009 | | $ | 1,258 | | $ | 1,857 |
*This reconciliation is included for purposes of the Pay Versus Performance table and discussion.
49
A-1
impact of the components adjusted for in the non-GAAP financial measure so that both measures and the individual components may be considered when analyzing our performance.
|
|
|
|
|
| For the year ended | |
|
| December 31, 2017 | |
Adjustments to net income: |
|
|
|
Net income |
| $ | 14,579 |
Adjustments (non-GAAP)(1) |
|
| 16,205 |
Adjusted net income (non-GAAP) |
| $ | 30,784 |
|
|
|
|
(1) Adjustments: |
|
|
|
Non-interest expense adjustments: |
|
|
|
Acquisition-related |
| $ | 2,691 |
Special bonus accrual |
|
| 491 |
Total pre-tax adjustments (non-GAAP) |
|
| 3,182 |
Collective tax expense impact |
|
| (1,209) |
Deferred tax asset re-measurement |
|
| 18,457 |
Excess tax benefit on stock-based compensation |
|
| (4,225) |
Adjustments (non-GAAP) |
| $ | 16,205 |
Return on Average Tangible Common Equity and Return on Average Tangible Assets ($ in thousands)
50
| | | |
| | As of and for the year ended | |
| | December 31, 2023 | |
Net income | | $ | 142,048 |
Add: impact of other intangible assets amortization expense, after tax | |
| 5,668 |
Net income excluding the impact of other intangible assets amortization expense, after tax (non-GAAP) | | $ | 147,716 |
| | | |
Average assets | | $ | 9,766,448 |
Less: average goodwill and other intangible assets, net of deferred tax liability related to goodwill | | | (345,321) |
Average tangible assets (non-GAAP) | | $ | 9,421,127 |
| | | |
Average shareholders' equity | | $ | 1,155,777 |
Less: average goodwill and other intangible assets, net of deferred tax liability related to goodwill | |
| (345,321) |
Average tangible common equity (non-GAAP) | | $ | 810,456 |
| | | |
Return on average assets | | | 1.5% |
Return on average tangible assets (non-GAAP) | | | 1.6% |
Return on average equity | | | 12.3% |
Return on average tangible common equity (non-GAAP) | | | 18.2% |
Tangible Common Book Value per Share ($ in thousands)
| | | | | | |
|
| December 31, 2023 | | December 31, 2022 | ||
| | | | | | |
Total shareholders' equity | | $ | 1,212,807 | | $ | 1,092,202 |
Less: goodwill and other intangible assets, net | | | (364,716) | | | (327,191) |
Add: deferred tax liability related to goodwill | | | 12,208 | | | 10,984 |
Tangible common equity (non-GAAP) | | $ | 860,299 | | $ | 775,995 |
| | | | | | |
Tangible common book value per share calculations: | | | | | | |
Tangible common equity (non-GAAP) | | $ | 860,299 | | $ | 775,995 |
Divided by: ending shares outstanding | | | 37,784,851 | | | 37,608,519 |
Tangible common book value per share (non-GAAP) | | $ | 22.77 | | $ | 20.63 |
| |
| THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date SCAN TO VIEW MATERIALS & VOTE To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000635406_1 R1.0.0.6 For Withhold For All All All Except The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following: 1. Election of Directors Nominees 01) Ralph W. Clermont 02) Robert E. Dean 03) Robin A. Doyle 04) Alka Gupta 05) Fred J. Joseph 06) G. Timothy Laney 07) Patrick Sobers 08) Micho F. Spring 09) Art Zeile NATIONAL BANK HOLDINGS CORPORATION 7800 EAST ORCHARD ROAD, SUITE 300 GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO, 80111 VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com or scan the QR Barcode above Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of |
| |
| 0000635406_2 R1.0.0.6 Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The Proxy Statement, Annual Report |
